It's nice that every once in a while download news comes from a pragmatic, rather than disciplinary, realm. In the last few years, the tide of of industry crackdown on media piracy has only risen—the closing of peer-to-peer program Napster, the onset of RIAA lawsuits and the seizure of bit-torrents site OiNK but a few of the symptoms.
The Independent reports
that ministers in the U.K. announced they are backing a proposal
from John Hutton, the Business Secretary, and Andy Burnham, the Culture
Secretary, to tax Internet users who engage in music downloading and
sharing with a £20 to £30 fee. The plan would be implemented after
sending letters to over 12,000 active up- and downloaders, warning them
that they are in violation of U.K. law.
In hopes to avoid
alternatives such as using the criminal justice system (as
with the OiNK case) or requiring Internet Service Providers to turn
over the identities of those involved,
supporters say the proposal is an important step to reviving the
country's suffering music industry in the country without violating rights.
Still,
Ministers are wary about the issues involved with controlling Internet
use on a governmental level and would like ISPs and the music industry
to "take responsibility for the issue," as one Whitehall source said,
though doing nothing is "not an option." How it will turn out is
unclear, but like a similar plan
proposed earlier this year in the U.S., it marks a new step in thinking
about how to reconcile illegality with such popular behavior. After
all, piracy, others in the U.K. would claim, is not as cut and dry as some might believe.
Related links:
Transcript from BPI press conference
The Guardian: "Government wants to cut illegal filesharing by 80% by 2011"
RIAA.com
Got news tips for Paste? E-mail news@pastemagazine.com.


how mny music creators, publishers, labels and the like are paying their local business taxes? My guess is that many of them don't even have business licenses and should be fined for that.