What whiskey makes us remember
After 9/11, sages in the publishing world predicted a further decline in novel reading and an increased interest in nonfiction. The real world was too much for us, now, to fool around with fanciful, made-up stories.
Sure enough, among storytelling books, the memoir reigned on high
until several of the most successful turned out to be fiction. Or at
least fictionalized versions of the truth.
Well, good. Fiction’s probably a better medium for memoir anyway.
Twain declared that Tom Sawyer was all true. Wolfe didn’t make much up,
did he? My Ántonia is an emotional autobiography of Willa Cather’s
youth. Then there’s Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.
Matt Bondurant’s second novel, The Wettest County in The World,
openly and happily sits on the fence between these fields. Subtitled A
Novel Based on a True Story, it begins, “The brindled sow stood in the
corner, glowering at the boy. Jack Bondurant hefted a bolt-action .22
rifle with a deep blue octagon barrel, the stock chewed and splintered
from brush and river stone.” Here you have, right away, the rich,
flavorful detail, the authority of deeply involved witness, and the
presence of Jack Bondurant, the author’s grandfather, as the main
character. And, of course, the direct, unblinking promise of bloody
violence.
Bondurant’s grandfather and two grand-uncles ran illegal
whiskey—white lightnin’, moonshine (its makers just called it corn or
whiskey)—out of Franklin County, Va., in the 1920s, and were known for
the brutal enforcement of their independence and protection of their
investments. Matt Bondurant recreates, or I should say largely
imagines, the circumstances and events that led to a fatal
confrontation between the Bondurant brothers and a corrupt local
syndicate bent on controlling all the illegal hooch coming out of the
county.
In an afterword, Bondurant (The Third Translation, 2005) explains
that, starting with family stories and historical record, including the
transcript of a well-known trial, he essentially wrote “a parallel
history” of these people from his family’s past. He had to invent much
of it, and says, “My intention was to reach that truth that lies beyond
the poorly recorded and understood world of actualities.”
Jack Bondurant—whom the author knew only as an old, quiet man his
family visited a few times each year—comes alive here as an ambitious
young fellow determined to escape his apparent fate as a poor tobacco
farmer. Jack’s brothers, Howard and Forrest, are complex, violent,
taciturn men who, respectively, make and distribute whiskey, bringing
Jack into the business when it’s obvious he won’t stay out. The
Bondurant brothers are the crime bosses of Franklin County, until the
local Commonwealth Attorney decides to horn in with corrupt lawmen as
his enforcers. The ensuing conflict is bloody, murderous and
inexorable. A cut throat, a castration, a body broken from head to toe,
men shot at close range—we can assume that these are not necessarily
details Bondurant made up, but he recreates them vividly.
It’s not all grim, though. In one hilarious chapter, “Aunt Winnie”
returns home early to find that her house and all its plumbing have
been transformed into a still.
One of the book’s more curious elements is Bondurant’s use of
Sherwood Anderson, author of the iconic Winesburg, Ohio, as a
character. Anderson, who moved to Virginia and bought a couple of local
newspapers, provides a pensive outsider’s perspective. In some of
Bondurant’s most wonderfully gloomy, lyrical prose, the
author-turned-journalist ruminates on the grim economic forces behind
such a booming illegal trade. “It was a never-ending battle to make do
with what you already had,” he writes, “and when things gave out they
literally exploded into red dust.”
But the real heart of the book is Bondurant’s grandfather, Jack, a
sensitive young man ill-suited to the violent world of whiskey running,
yet determined to escape from a Sisyphean life of back-breaking work
with little or no material reward. He won’t maim and murder for his
reward, but he’ll help his brothers do that, without apology. Watching
a group of embittered old-timers, he thinks, “They only chew on the cud
of their past. That’ll never happen to me
. Not to me.”

Comments