Page 1 of 2
In preparation for this month's violence issue, we grappled mightily with the role of bloodshed, tumult and mayhem in art. And while there's no clear conclusion to be reached as to the appropriate volume or timbre of violence in media in general, and films in particular, one thing is for certain: It's everywhere. It's in movies that we love and movies that we loathe. It can do greater good than the sum of its bloody parts, illustrating something vital about life, humanity or violence itself-- and it can pander and manipulate to its own destructive, pointless ends. And often, the element that makes violence exemplary in one instance can be utilized elsewhere to exploit and debase, both across and within films.
Here we've compiled lists of some of the best and the worst violent movies, judged exclusively on the violence within. Share your picks, too. You'll likely find, as we did, that the line between righteousness and gratuitousness is often blurry.
Unforgiven (1992)
Clint Eastwood subverts one of the earliest film genres to celebrate violence, and does more than just show the uglier aspects of such brutality-- he strips us of the self-righteousness that justifies it. When "The Schofield Kid" tells Eastwood's William Moony that his victim had it coming, Moony's reply encapsulates the film's theme: "We all got it coming, kid."
Natural Born Killers (1994)
Written by Quentin Tarantino and directed by Oliver Stone, this film is frequently blasted for its shocking, over-the-top bloodshed. But a deeper look reveals a scathing, brilliantly prophetic indictment of the mainstream media's irresponsible, sensational treatment of real-life violence.
Saving Private Ryan (1998)
Stephen Speilberg accomplishes a hyper-realistic depiction of valor in service of freedom for humanity in this film's brutal D-day scene.
Torn Curtain (1966)
After years of showing how easy it is for someone, anyone, to turn violent, Hitchcock's later works began taking all the fun out of killing. You need only watch this scene from Torn Curtain to see murder in all its difficulty.
The Boondock Saints (1999)
Two Irish-Catholic vigilantes doing God's work in Boston are praised by town and the FBI, but the viewer is forced to question the fine line of morality these men tread: Are the brutal execution scenes fit to be seen as altruistic and in line with the brothers' religious faith?
Three Kings (1999)
Notable for this shot, in which the camera follows a bullet through a cross-section of the human body, vividly demonstrating the internal damage caused by a gunshot wound. It's a highly stylized, but certainly not glamorized, view of modern warfare.
Straw Dogs (1971)
Of the film, starring Dustin Hoffman as a neurotic bookworm who resorts to animalistic violence when his home is invaded, director Sam Peckinpah "I intend it to have a cathartic effect. Someone may feel a sick exultation at the violence, but he should then ask himself, 'What is going on in my heart?' I want to achieve a catharsis through pity and fear."

Where Have All The Weird Girls Gone?…

The idea that Boondock Saints is even vaguely thoughtful in its treatment of violence is more offensive than any of the pornographic violence featured in the film I cannot believe you missed, The Passion of the Christ. Boondock Saints, derivative drivel that it is, relishes the gunshot wounds and splatter effects for their video game quality. It's attempt to complicate the matter by injecting ham-fisted and logically unbelievable religious conviction fails when the characters rattle off their prayers. They have a zealots dedication; Willem Defoe's character hardly wrestles with a moral quandry over the legitimacy of the vigilante justice, favoring fanaticism. The closest BS comes to forcing actual contemplation are the news interviews at the end, but it's so tacked on that it can't reasonably be expected to comment on all that came before it.
Yeah, Boondock Saints is incredibly over rated. Kudos for including Unforgiven, but where is American Psycho?