Page 2 of 2
Meanwhile, Lipstick Jungle's cancellation still stings a bit. Earlier this year, I tuned in to its series premiere with only slightly higher expectations than I would have for Kath & Kim, and while it didn't leave me with an unscratchable mental rash, when faced with no plans at 10 p.m on any given Wednesday, I found myself compelled to tune in.I never bought the "next Sex & the City" billing; from the get go, Jungle was less charming and, despite its three characters' arguably bigger fashion allowances, less glamorous. Wendy (Brooke Shields) is the president of a major movie production company and the married mother of two, Victory (Lindsay Price) a spunky fashion designer, Nico (Kim Raver) the Editor-In-Chief of the fictional Bonfire magazine. They're all best friends, there for each other through thick and thin, which is great for everyone else in their lives, because these pals don't just lean on each other; they heave, they crush, they smother. They are an unstoppable trifecta of misery.
Wendy seems to have awoken one morning to the cruel realization that she has children who requiring parenting and a husband with career aspirations of his own. Victory is struggling to get her first clothing line off the ground (a plot point confused by her massive uptown apartment, which puts that of her far more successful-- and far more stylish-- would-be doppelganger Carrie Bradshaw to shame) while juggling incompetent assistants and pesky suitors. And Nico is battling the tedium of a seemingly perfect marriage and a high-powered editorial job that apparently requires nothing more than her attendance at a mind-blowingly efficient once-weekly meeting and allows her to gab with friends and conduct other personal business out of her plush corner office.
At one point, Nico learns that a male co-worker is vying for a higher-up position that she also covets (inexplicably, as it runs the risk of upping her workload from nonexistent to slight), so she summarily edges him out of his job entirely by convincing him the company is tanking. That one of Lipstick Jungle's primary characters works at a magazine publishing company wherein employees must be tricked into fearing for their job security indicates just how firm of a grasp the show has on reality.
Still, it was fun while it lasted-- mostly because I, rooted in the terra firma of actual life, occasionally enjoy being reminded that even my higher-up working-girl counterparts have shit days, too. Lots of them, actually. Lots and lots of shit days. Most of which were brought on by their own choices. Their own bad choices. Like Victory leasing the floorspace for her first store from her billionaire ex-boyfriend. Like Wendy forging a insurance paperwork to allow an actor friend to work on his John Lennon biopic opus despite the brain tumor ravaging his brain. Like Nico cheating on her husband-- who would eventually cheat on her, but hadn't yet-- with a photographer half her age.
I felt like I was meant to root for the ladies, but I mostly just gloated. Was I supposed to believe that they shouldn't have known better, that these were choices I was meant to sympathize-- if not empathize-- with? Am I alone in this confusion? Was Lipstick Jungle's self-righteous self-indulgence intentional, or an unfortunate tonal misfire? And is that what lead to its ultimate demise? I can't say for sure, of course. Either way, it probably didn't help.
Weeks before its cancellation and Kath & Kim's extension I started and stopped a few blog posts wondering which show would be more successful in America's new economic environment: The one about the women living upper-upper-middle-class lives, regardless of whether they could afford it, jetting off to Paris, pushing kids through private school, attempting to save their floundering marriages with collagen injections to the hoo-ha? Or the one about the women who spend their lives window-shopping, eating food court lunches, one freeloading, the other lusting over a fairy tale wedding and likely breaking her small, tacky bank to get it?
Neither are particularly flattering-- not to mention accurate-- portraits of American women, but for now, at least, the mallrats seem to have won.


I was not bothered by lipstick jungle being cancelled. I had a fundamental problem with the show, it never lived up to it's billing. I watched an episode with my wife and not once did any of tese 50 somethings have hot lipstick, mondo disappointment, that is like shooting a documentay of hooters and not showing a hooters girl in uniform. That being said, the plot seemed rehashed from 30 somethings, rich white people with lives to kill for and them whining about it (while not wearing lipstick).
I will admit I liked it better than sex in the city which is putrid, the youngest gal on there is late 40's and seeing geriatric love gymnastics is not cool, especially if it involves mr ed (sarah jessica parker) and the stay puft marshmellow man (chris noth).
I am a big fan of my own worst enemy and that got axed. I guess the only requirement to be a programmer at a network is a love of old chicks and a labotomy.
So, I must make a few corrections and comments. I loved this show and am sad to see it go. It was stylish, the characters bold and strong in their own right and for each other and most of all charming.
Getting to my corrections, Victory Ford was a successful designer. This is the second season. The series opened with Victory showing a collection condemned by fashion gurus; thus, the powers that be caused her first label, which afforded Victory her plush apartment, to tank. She had to start over from scratch.
Second, in the first season, Joe Bennett, Victory's ex-beau, buys Victory's company, and she doesn't have the money to finance things on her own. So, that puts her in quite a predicament, not to mention that Mr. Bennett apparently owns much of the prime real estate suitable for a flagship store like one "owned" buy a now fledgling designer (Victory) trying to regain her business. Why not lease from someone she could at least trust and wouldn't charge her a ton more than the bank, especially with the prospect of recouping the funds to buy back her business more quickly with said storefront?
Third, Nico did make a poor choice when she chose to cheat on her husband, but who can argue that that isn't realistic? And she shouldn't in fact couldn't-- given what we know about her relationship with her husband, Charles--be blamed for Charles' infidelity simply because she had an affair. It was revealed after his death that Charles had been cheating for years with his mistress, three to be exact. That affair started long before Nico presumably ever conceived of cheating on her husband.
I agree with the author of this article in that there was no mind-boggling mystery, but the show definitely compelled me to watch when free on Wednesday evenings. Heck, I even recorded it on my DVR. Moreover, it is in my opinion the first show since Girlfriends to hold a candle to Sex in the City, and believe me I was an AVID fan of Sex in the City, so I was critical. The show was engaging and a good representation for women (Movie Producer, Magazine Editor, Fashion Designer) all of whom were down to earth, supportive of one another and flawed yet exemplary in their own ways. I give this show a thumbs up and NBC the thumbs down for canceling it over Kath & Kim.