Atlanta tax accountant Fred Benario loves music. You probably do too, but likely not in the same way. Benario, who doesn't work much after April 15 each year, obsessively listens to as much new music as "humanly possible." How much, you ask? Read on to try to wrap your brain around what could be The Biggest Year End List In the World.
Paste: How many albums did you listen to in 2008? How much time, on average, did you invest in each one?
Benario: I
probably listened to 1,500 albums in 2008. In order to give some
structure to my goal of hearing everything that came out, I decided
that I had to listen to an album twice before putting it on the list. Bad albums, though, certainly didn't get two full listens, and for the
most part didn't make it onto the list, even under a negative heading
like "Poor Albums."
Paste: Do you buy all these albums? If not, how do you get them all?
Benario: I
don't buy any albums. When you only have time to listen to something a
couple of times, these doesn't seem to be much point to owning it (and
I don't want to clutter up my hard drive with a bunch of albums I don't
have time to listen to). I pay Rhapsody
$35/quarter, which gives me instant access to a great deal of music,
and also use a number of sites that stream albums at no cost, including
one European site, which covers albums not released in the US. I
actually download very few albums.
Paste: How do you keep it all
from running together? Are you making notes as you go? And if you do,
why aren't you Twittering or blogging or something?
Benario: You bet
I keep records as I go! When you're trying to stay on top of this much
information, you've got to be organized and disciplined. I've thought
about doing something on a daily basis, but I'm not sure there is any
demand. And, like most people, I'm barely getting done every day all
the things I want to get done, so adding another ongoing responsibility
may not be the easiest thing in the world to do.
Paste: We once talked about the idea of "quality via quantity"; your sheer volume of listening gives you a unique perspective. What macro-trends did you pick up on in 2008?
Benario: There
is an enormous amount of unique, creative, exciting music coming from
bands in different European countries that most folks in the U.S. never
hear about, which is quite a pity. The Netherlands, especially, is
very fertile ground for interesting experimental stuff.
In the
U.S., there seems to have been a real rebirth of psychedelic rock,
revisiting the Jefferson Airplane and the San Francisco sound. Everyone should listen to Dead Confederate and Dark Meat, both from Athens, Ga.!
In England there was a nice resurgence of '90s trip-hop bands, with an updated sound. Portishead, Tricky and Primal Scream all released good albums last year.
On
the downside last year, there was way too much similarity among all the
major Best Of lists, almost as if people were scared to step out on a
limb by themselves. Bon Iver's For Emma sounds like about two
dozen other albums released last year, and thus in my mind CAN'T be the
album of the year. Conversely, in 2007, The National and Arcade Fire
released albums that didn't sound like everything else, and thus could
were legitimately be named albums of the year.
Paste: How did 2008 compare to 2007? Is music getting better or worse?
Benario: I
would say music is getting better as a general matter, in large part
because the ease of releasing music gets easier on an ongoing basis. Putting music on a MySpace page
is certainly easier than paying to have a few copies of a single
pressed, like back in the old days, and doesn't involve any
distribution issues. Obviously, the more music released and the more
you listen to, the more good stuff you hear. Of course, this doesn't
mean anyone is making money off music, but that was also true in the
past, when only bands lucky enough to be signed made any money.
Paste: Do you ever take some time to listen over and over again to your favorites?
Benario: Not
as much as I used to. I find listening to new albums by bands I've
never heard of so stimulating that I don't listen to many albums more
than about three times. Plus, if my goal is to hear as many new releases
as possible, every extra repeat listen would reduce the total number of
new albums I hear. (I also don't watch much TV anymore, for the same
reason, and unfortunately don't read as many books, either.)
It's a different approach, no doubt, but Benario has a perspective that few, if any, possess. If you're an adventurous lover of music, you'll want to check out the list, if only for its methodical organization (Belgium Experimental, '80s bands worth listening to, etc.).



Wow.
I'm sorry, I don't mean to be offensive but this isn't being a music fan. This is being an obsessive-compulsive know-it-all. Yes, I agree there are plenty of "hipster" types who throw albums in our face that most folks don't like but they claim are the best of a given year. By the same token, plenty of great albums are dismissed by these very same folks. So, to that end, some of his opinions are valid (I woudn't suggest otherwise).
But to decide an album is "bad" on the basis of less than one listen? Personally, I really like to give albums a chance to grow - that's when you discover alot about the album and the artist. For example, he cites Dead Confederate. I was not really taken with their album at first but after several listens it began to grow on me and I now consider it a very good album.
Beyond that, to never listen to an album you actually like more than three times? This, as a self-professed (but not expert) music lover boggles my mind.
Again I apologize but this is perhaps the least credible list I've ever come across - even taking into account that all "best of" lists are subjective and opinion based. Kudos to Mr. Benario for having heard more albums than anyone else last year but a music lover he is most decidedly not.
Harlan, I don't know. Why not take Fred at his word when he says he finds listening to new music "stimulating"? I know the guy and I can tell you....he LOVES music. Just a little differently.
Not to knock his style or anything, but I'm a fan of music in a different way. Usually my favorite albums are the ones I'm not that into at first and then over time become my favorite album. I couldn't see him enjoying the music. It just sounds like he's listening to it as a job and forming a quick thought from it. I wouldn't lie though, it would be interesting to hear that many albums in one year.
I disagree Harlan -- anyone with any musical knowledge at all would have detected the stench of the last Stooges record in about 10 minutes.
Different strokes, my friend. For my part, I'm equally put off by bloggers who call themselves "passionate" because they've catalogued every waking moment of Blue Cheer or the Strawberry Alarm Clock.