Until recently, movies about Tibet haven’t wavered much from the formula established by Frank Capra’s 1937 epic Lost Horizon, in which plane-crash victims discover the lost kingdom of Shangri-La—a magical place where time stands still and there is no war, violence or jealousy. Thankfully, since 1999, Himalayan filmmakers like Bhutanese monk Khyentse Norbu have started challenging these stereotypes by telling their own stories.
Now out on DVD, Milarepa is the region’s newest movie. Made by first-time director Neten Chokling (another Buddhist monk, and an actor in Norbu’s lighthearted debut The Cup), it tells the story of Tibet’s most popular cultural hero, a young man who studies black magic in an all-consuming quest for revenge against those who robbed his family. As exotic as the film’s subject may seem, Milarepa’s story is as familiar to Himalayan audiences as DeMille’s Biblical epics were to Americans in the 1950s.
Unlike recent American movies about Tibet, Milarepa does not explore overtly political themes, and—unlike Hollywood directors who have tackled the subject—Chokling has no plans of introducing Tibetan politics into his films. “What is happening in Tibet is a painful situation,” he says from his monastery in Bhutan, “yet the suffering taking place there is explored in Milarepa, and I hope that the messages of compassion, tolerance and honesty embodied in his story do get communicated and make an impact. Injustice, revenge and remorse are relevant in today’s world, though Milarepa’s story is 1,500 years old.”
Chokling is currently planning a sequel, and he doesn’t want to restrict himself to traditional stories. “We would like to tell the rest of Milarepa’s tale,” he says. “We’ll take a different approach that is less linear—more ‘modern’—with the hope that we could reach a wider audience. I have an ongoing discussion with Norbu about presenting our culture in stories that are not specifically Buddhist. I am interested in telling a modern tale without the structure of a traditional story, but with a focus on similar themes.”
AN INTRODUCTION TO FILMS ABOUT TIBET
Little Buddha (1993)
Despite the questionable casting of Keanu Reeves as the Siddhartha, Buddha admirably familiarizes Western audiences with the current situation
in Tibet, and with Buddhist concepts such as reincarnation.
Seven Years in Tibet (1997)
Brad Pitt stars as the Austrian climber Heinrich Harrer, who escapes to Tibet from a British prison camp in the Himalayas during World War II. While in Tibet he becomes the young Dalai Lama’s tutor and witnesses the first Chinese invasion in 1950.
Kundun (1997)
Martin Scorsese’s uneven Dalai Lama biopic describes the Tibetan leader’s childhood up until the time he was forced to flee his homeland with the Chinese army in hot pursuit.
The Cup (1999)
The first major release from a Himalayan director is a delightful comedy about monks at a remote monastery searching for a TV to watch the World Cup.
Travelers and Magicians (2003)
Norbu’s follow-up to The Cup is an even better film that explores humor and pathos in a way that owes as much to Woody Allen as it does to traditional Tibetan storytelling.

Download Harper Blynn's "Centrifugal Motion"

As a Bhutnaese citizen Im deeply offended that the author has included Travelers and Magicians in this list. Bhutan is not Tibet, and including this film by a Bhutnaese, about Bhutanese, set in Bhutan as Tibetan is a highly inaccurate and quite irritating.
What is happening to the making of Milarepa 2 (continued)?
Is it released yet?
Also, it seems like Graham Coleman's epic Tibet: A Buddhist Trilogy is missing. Even if you find its content an overly PC version, it's undeniably thorough and beautiful.
VAJRA SKY OVER TIBET is a moving documentary by director John Bush and has been called "the definitive film about Tibet in the 21st century."(Buffalo News) It is
magnificent and will be broadcast on PBS in the fall.
Rinpoches should be staying at Gonpa and pray not the other way around.If Rinpoches watches bollywood movies and make movies, it is better to take off their robes and act like a normal man. You can't take all the advantages of being Rinpochey and enjoying all the rights of being civilian.
Stop fooling people.
I am more appreciative of his approach.
Others such as Seven Years in Tibet had too much creative fabrications. I.e., rather than a Nazi, the character is cast as an Austrian mountain climber. The Chinese army was portrayed as cruel and imperialists though even the original author suggested the contrary.
Dude, Tsering, take a chill pill! ever heard of skillful means? films are the new thangka paintings. don't disrespect these Rinpoches if you are not at their level of realization....like, who are you to judge them? I for one applaud the courage of Khyentse Rinpoche and Chokling Rinpoche and believe they are following in the footsteps of their predecessors.
[quote]Shangri-La—a magical place where time stands still and there is no war, violence or jealousy. [/quote]
Well, it only exists in westerner’s imagination. In fact, Tibet was the poorest and most illiterate nations on Earth. There was not enough food; girls were not educated at all, boys were lucky to learn how to read. Tibetan society was essentially caste-based, with a secular aristocracy, a theocratic monkhood, and numerous peasant serfs who were under the thrall and contract of the former, working land not theirs to support these castes.
ourlives, you sound like a chinese shill. let us now follow the party line! caste-based, aristocracy, peasant serfs, etc etc. don't bother thinking for yourself. the world owes a deep debt to Tibet for being the only country in the world that actually preserved the precious Vajrayana teachings. the author's idealization of Tibet's past is no excuse to malign Tibetan society in the one-sided way you are doing. open your eyes!
Good quality fiction films are difficult to find when it comes to Tibetan films but this also applies for the Himalayan region.
The blissful ignorance of this writer is astonishing when it comes to classifying films; mixing Tibetan and Bhutanese is just one example apart from the western projections on Tibet crystallized in fiction films. There’s nothing wrong with these fiction films; they are just fiction films but too often too many pretend they have some realistic connotation or bare some truth.
But there is more: when it comes to documentaries there are some outstanding docs to watch which are not barely political. If future fiction filmmakers would like to make some better films on Tibet or the Tibetan world, it’s worth and advisable studying these first.