Release Date: July 17
Director: Marc Webb
Writers: Scott Neustadter & Michael H. Weber
Starring: Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Zooey Deschanel
Cinematographer: Eric Steelberg
Studio/Run Time: Fox Searchlight, 95 mins.
Love story tries too hard
In (500) Days of Summer, Joseph Gordon-Levitt plays Tom, whose job at a
greeting-card factory is a daily grind until new employee Summer (Zooey
Deschanel) arrives. A clock ticks off the 500 days between their first
glance and their eventual breakup like miles on an odometer. The
narrator tells us at the outset that this is not a love story, and
then—to keep reminding us of that—director Marc Webb shows all 500 days
out of sequence, weaving the weeks of cute flirtation and courtship
with the relationship’s mopey decline. At each juncture, an onscreen
relation-o-meter spins forward or backward to help us get our bearings.
The biggest problem with the film is that the upslope is far more entertaining than the downslope. It’s more fun to watch the simplistic relationship building than falling apart, so the film’s humorous bits in the early days often give way to dead patches when we regrettably lurch into the hundreds. The film works in that the dialogue is sharp and witty, the soundtrack is hip and indie, Gordon-Levitt is effortlessly funny and wide-eyed Deschanel is a good foil for his quirks. But Webb (a music-video director) and screenwriters Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber (who also wrote the story for Steve Martin’s latest terrible Pink Panther movie) seem determined to break the mold of romantic comedies without having the guts to actually do it.
Despite the narrator’s advisory, (500) Days of Summer is indeed a love story, because almost everything we know about Summer and Tom revolves around their relationship. Their eventual separation—not bitterly but ordinarily—is a twist of the plot, not of the heart, and the warning not to get too invested in the couple feels schizophrenic, setting them on the annoying path of a ping-pong ball.
The intercutting eventually kills the momentum, causing the film’s second half to drag. But (500) Days of Summer was surprisingly popular with audiences at the Sundance and SXSW film festivals, most likely because of the film’s rousing final minute, which aims to send people into the lobby with smiles on their faces. The conclusion does reclaim some of the film’s early spunk, and that springboard may be all film-festival audiences need to declare to their friends that they were among the first to see the next Garden State or Juno. Overall, it’s a modest success—slickly produced, attractively shot by Juno cinematographer Eric Steelberg, perfectly enjoyable in its light moments but unduly weighed down by the remainder.
Watch the (500) Days of Summer trailer:


I respectfully disagree about the second half dragging. And I think the beauty of this film is that it does capture that disappointment and pain as the end of a relationship is much less fun than the end. I think part of the strength of Zooey Descahnel's character is that she doesn't really change, the relationship just doesn't work for her anymore. That's real life.
I may be partial because I was recently dumped and/or because I met Zooey Deschanel and Joseph Gordon-Levitt at SXSW, and they were both tremendously nice people. But I saw the movie before these things happened, so I think it stands on its own merit.
Also, Zooey assured me that She & Him Volume 2 is definitely in the works and she's really excited about it. I also met her fiance Ben Gibbard, but didn't realize it until I'd already asked him where the ladies room was and walked away. It was a complete idiot moment.
500 Days of Summer was a great film. I had the chance to see it a couple months back and can't wait to see it again tomorrow.
I'm not sure how I felt about the second half of the film. On one hand it was a little drab at times but I think that adds to the whole point of that part. It wasn't entirely dragging since it picks up later on but it wasn't as bright as the first half.
51?!?
Still my favourite film of the year, it's perfect in my mind.
I'm disappointed by this review. To me, the juxtaposed "light" parts vs. "weighed down" moments are the film's strong points. It's a real relationship that we have all experienced in some way - two individuals enter a relationship on different levels of commitment and it doesn't even out.
The back-and-forth of the timeline is effective pay-off for the audience to track with the progress of the relationship.
I really enjoyed this film - in all its quirky musical moments and characters.
I agree that 51 and this review are unfair to the film.
This movie isn't intended to simply make you laugh, and thats what Robert Davis was missing when they watched this movie. Sure, it wasn't what I imagined either. It was better.
The dialogue and interaction of this movie takes you through the happiness, anger and depression of dealing with a person you care deeply for. Sure, its not all happy-go-lucky, and the latter half of the film isn't as funny or uplifting as the first; but the question I would pose to Davis is "How happy and funny does life seem when you just found out that the only girl you've ever loved is engaged?" Life after breaking up with your first love is hell and probably the most depressing time of one's life, but as Tom shows us, there comes a time when you need to get up, move on, and live your life.
Like the tag-line of the movie states: this is a story about love, not a love-story. This movie has a beautiful meaning to a wonderfully written/portrayed story, and I would not let this terrible rating shy anyone from seeing this film. Its marvelous.
I can appreciate that people who enjoy the film are able to see some of themselves in Tom and Summer. That's fair.
I'm not sure I made the point very well in the review, but my reservations about (500) Days of Summer don't stem from the fact that life is hard, that some relationships fail, and that the film tries to show that. My complaint is that it doesn't, really, which is why the light parts are so much more convincing that the high-numbered days.
We know almost nothing about Summer (she likes The Smiths), and she changes so little -- as far as we can tell -- that the film feels as superficial, to me, as any typical summer rom-com, even though it claims it's trying to break the mold. The out-of-sequence story has everything to do with Hollywood expectations and nothing to do with revealing anything about these characters.
There are two scenes that I love, and it took everything I had not to mention them in the review -- I didn't want to spoil the surprise -- but I'll mention them in this comment. Tom's celebratory dance sequence is great, and better still is the split screen sequence where we see what really happened at a party and what might, in some fantasy, have happened. That split-screen bit in particular is brilliant, and it shows what could have been; bring reality in sync with the fantasy and let it break our hearts. But no, the empty stuff resumes. The pre-teens who give Tom advice. Tom's comically disheveled appearance. Etc.
To me, it's an attempt to go beyond what Nathan Rabin has called the manic pixie dream girl, but it fails because it replaces her with something just as superficial and unknowable.
Oh well. The movie is kind of fun at times, but once I realized that it was going to skim the surface I began to lose patience with the back-and-forth.
Thank you for mentioning the MPDG! That's exactly what I thought of when I saw Zoey & yet I would agree with your judgment that the character ultimately fails to be that joy-bringer for Tom. However, I also think that it's a purposeful fail... the character doesn't change & that's the point. She's not the dream girl. Don't you think that's a valid point in the film? Or are you still convinced by the light parts? You think they were meant for each other? (just stirring the pot)
Well, I do think that's what the filmmakers were going for -- i.e. they want to upend the normal rules of romantic comedies because this time the MPDG isn't The One. But to me it feels like an attempt to be different but not too different, and it's a concept they shy away from whenever possible. That's the reason the film is structured the way it is, I'd say. They're too afraid to make the audience fall in love with the girl and then dash everyone's hopes, so they try to ease us into it. (This is probably savvy for marketing reasons, but to me it's kind of a cheat.) Also, who's the girl at the end (in the lobby) but a brand new attempt at MPDG. Nothing learned. New season.
Did you ever see The Good Girl? It's not a masterpiece, but I find it a much more interesting exploration of a similar idea. It's a very different film in many ways, but one of the core pieces involves a brooding guy (Jake Gyllenhaal) who Jennifer Aniston falls for, but her superficial reasons are eventually exposed.
So I think I like (500) whenever I don't take it too seriously, not necessarily because I think these two belong together. When it tries to be somewhat serious -- except in a few brief instances -- I don't believe it.
Very insightful response, Robert. I haven't seen The Good Girl but I'll be sure to check it out!