Release Date: July 10 (limited)
Director: Lynn Shelton
Writer: Lynn Shelton
Starring: Mark Duplass, Joshua Leonard, Alycia Delmore
Cinematographer: Benjamin Kasulke
Studio/Run Time: Magnolia Pictures, 95 mins.
Ben and Andrew’s infinitely awkward sex dare
If Kevin Smith’s movie Zack and Miri Make a Porno had an ounce of spontaneity and a drop of wisdom, it might have resembled Humpday, the new film from Lynn Shelton. I’m not sure that Shelton would care much for the comparison, since she’s made a comedy with real characters and very few, if any, raunchy jokes, but the plots are similar enough that Humpday feels like Zack and Miri’s low-budget indie cousin.
Ben and Andrew (played by Mark Duplass from The Puffy Chair and Joshua Leonard from The Blair Witch Project) go way back. But they’ve drifted apart. Ben’s married and trying to have a kid; Andrew’s a free spirit who drifts into town one night unannounced, hoping to reconnect with his buddy. They end up at a party full of counter-culture types, an environment where Andrew instantly befriends everyone and Ben just does his best to keep up, trying not to look like the married fuddy-duddy that he fears he’s become. The effervescent atmosphere leads to a conversation about an amateur porn contest run by a local magazine, and before the night is over, when the pot smoke is at it’s thickest, Ben and Andrew have dared each other to make—and star in—their own adult video, with all that that entails.
Humpday may sound superficially like Smith’s film, but the premise and tone, at least initially, are more like Kelly Reichardt’s film Old Joy, and in that comparison, Humpday feels not like your stuffy aunt but like your rebellious cousin. Old Joy is a beautiful, subtly political lament, but Humpday seems like the film that it might have turned into if its director had ditched the script and lit up a doobie once the cameras started rolling. “OK, suppose these old friends agree to, I don’t know, have sex on camera.” Wait. What?
So Humpday itself is a little like Ben and a little like Andrew, depending on your point of view. It’s a free spirit, but it’s also grounded in real life. One day, those two personalities meet, and it can’t end well, for the characters or the film. But Shelton, who often seems hemmed in by the high concept, manages to worm her way out so expertly that when it’s over the whole thing feels like it was built backwards, starting not with the premise but with the last conversation between Ben and Andrew, a funny, observant look at the way straight male buddies interact. Personally, I’ve never seen two guys rationalize their way into or out of a porn shoot, but I nevertheless feel like I’ve heard this final conversation before. The topic is wild, but the nervous cadence, the macho attitude, and the analytical explanations are entirely familiar.
Humpday is a comedy, but for sheer fun, I probably prefer Baghead, the under-seen movie that was written and directed last year by Mark Duplass and his brother Jay. Baghead also moves in two directions at once—it’s a little bit funny and a little bit creepy—but because it seems more willing to let those conflicting modes ricochet off of each other instead of encouraging them to make peace, it’s open to all possibilities, ready to spring in any direction at any moment. Many of Humpday’s conversations feel spontaneous, like the one where Ben breaks the news of the dare to his wife, but the basic arc of the story fits into one flat track, focusing all of its comic suspense into a corner. We know where it’s going. We just don’t know what’s going to happen when it gets there. But it turns out that the corner has a tasty little iced cupcake waiting for those who accept the silly idea. It’s worth the wait, even if it leaves you a little hungry when it’s gone.
Watch the Humpday trailer:



Interestingly, Robert, and I say this not knowing anything about Humpday other than this article,but Paste gave Zack and Miri a 76, a 65, a full eleven point difference. This article comes across as degrading to Smith's work, which is fine, but make sure the comparisons make sense.
The 65 is my rating. I didn't review Zack and Miri and certainly wouldn't have given it a 76. Opinions vary.
Using one movie to disparage another, when the movie being touted only gets a "respectable" rating? Sorry, I had to double check, I thought I might have accidentally ended up on the Pitchfork website.
Another numerology-themed zinger.
This review is just my thought about how Humpday looks like the "stuffy aunt" of one movie but the "rebellious cousin" of another. Depends on your perspective. And the weird thing is that nobody-but-nobody would've seen similarities between Zack and Miri and Old Joy before Humpday came along to bridge the gap for us, which is kind of interesting, especially since the film itself is about bridging the gap between friends who've drifted apart. (Finding the proper distance is a theme that's common to all three films.)
You gotta read past the numbers, Justin. (65 is decent in my book. It'd be 3 or 3.5 on our old 5-point scale, comfortably above average. Respectable.)
Robert, I checked you past reviews. Everyone here has at least some cultural awareness and taste, or they'd be reading Entertainment Weekly. For over pretentiousness we would seriously go to Pitchfork. You're reviews come across as more harsh than needed. When I researched you're reviews, I discovered I was familiar with you're style, ala, the infamous review of the Watchmen. I wasn't a zealous fan of the movie, because the graphic novel was so great, but considering the source, if someone was planning on making the Watchmen a movie, this film did about as well as possible. The movie was visually stunning. Most people felt as if you weren't familiar at all with the novel.
You're reviews are unnecessarily harsh and come across as pompous. Lighten up a bit, don't you enjoy anything? If 65 is decent in you're book, I'd rather leave that book on the shelf.
And yet Rotten Tomatoes says I agree with the consensus 80% of the time. I reserve the other 20% for my own uniquely grumpy personality. I don't doubt the cultural awareness and taste of Paste readers; I count on it. (No pun intended.) I expect readers will want to think about more than whether the movie was angel-good or devil-bad.
Here are a few things I've enjoyed so far this year. (I laughed all the way through the first one in that list). And here are a few more that are coming soon, in no particular order and -- warning -- with no numerical ratings. And here is a metric ton of faves from 2008. Scroll down.
I also ate a meatloaf sandwich last week in San Francisco that was really, really tasty, and I wish I could have another, right now. I give it a solid 89, which, as far as meatloaf sandwiches go, kicks ass. Came with a cookie.
Justin, I like discussing movies and appreciate your enthusiasm for being one of this site's watchdogs, but I really wish you'd watch the flicks first and then offer an opinion. It's more interesting that way. I'm still not clear on your beef.
I have no beef with the movie Humpday or your review of it, and I'm not concerned with that all, so watching it doesn't matter, my beef is that your reviews come across as pretentious. If you're going to criticize one movie in beholding another, at least give the movie more than a D (which is what a 65 would translate to.) If that is your average, or even above average, then I can only assume you belong more at Pitchfork than here. I truly hate that magazine/website.
Ah, so maybe this all boils down to a misunderstanding of Paste's 100-point rating system. I hope this will be the last comment I have on the number business. Paste's scale is not the same as the percentage-based grades you received on exams in school (which should be obvious from this review, from my subsequent comments, and from the behavior of the little star widget at the top of every review at Paste -- roll your mouse over it).
Maybe this interview with our own Kate Keifer could help clarify. To quote a tidbit:
Here’s our scale: 0-25 regrettable, 26-49 forgettable, 50-74 respectable, 75-90 commendable, 91-100 phenomenal. Because everyone’s used to school-style grading, a reader might see a score of 70 and think it’s not very good, when it’s actually a good score—falling on the high end of “respectable.” Since our scale is relatively new, I think that readers will get used to the fact that a 60 is not a failing grade. We use 90 and above very sparingly.Furthermore, 65 is a 3.25 on our old 5-star scale, which is a B in the parlance of grade cards. I repeat: you're carping about a B rating for a film you haven't seen, apparently because I briefly compared it favorably to a film with which it shares some themes and plot points. Um?
Crap. Sorry, Kate, for misspelling your last name. I do know the I before E rule, really I do. (And now I also need to apologize to Kate for presuming she's reading this thread. Ha!)