This is the fairly uncontroversial start of a news item about Chuck Klosterman. A review of the new Beatles reissues anthology penned by him went up today at The Onion's A.V. Club. This follows his protracted absence (which probably has a lot to do with his forthcoming book Eating the Dinosaur) after his 1700-word screed/review of Chinese Democracy.
Ah, but prepare yourself for the real meat of this piece: the unexpected reversal preceding an onslaught of esoteric pop-culture witticisms and mixed metaphors. You see, the Howard Beale1 of cultural criticism hasn't just written any old review of the Beatles. No, like Robert DeNiro in The Deer Hunter, Klosterman's revolver has spun to reveal a chamber loaded with modern-rock-journalism, and he's pointed that cliché-gun straight at his allegorical captors (The Beatles.)
Now, you should probably just go ahead and read the whole thing for yourself. Haters will find more to gnash their teeth about, and fans will find any number of quotes to endlessly parrot and reblog. So really, in the end nothing has changed, and it's not like we've learned anything. You should also disregard everything you've just read. But also take it to heart. Because life is inherently contradictory, just like a tongue-in-cheek postmodern review of the Beatles.
Notable quotables, for easy water-cooler recitation:
- "It's not easy to categorize the Beatles' music; more than any other group, their sound can be described as "'Beatlesque.'"
- "The intensely private Mr. Harrison asks a few coquettish questions two-thirds of the way through the opus (“Do You Want To Know A Secret”) before Mr. Lennon obliterates the back door with the greatest rock voice of all time, accidentally inventing Matthew Broderick’s career."
- "Despite its commercial failure, Rubber Soul allegedly caused half-deaf Brian Wilson to make Pet Sounds. (I assume this is also why EMI released a mono version of the catalogue—it allows consumers to experience this album the same way Wilson did.)"
- "Though the artwork for Abbey Road seems eerily familiar (that’s actually my car in the photo’s background), the music it symbolizes is vaguely alien—I don’t know why they wrote a song about a Clue character, but that’s par for the course for these lovemaking, chain-smoking longhairs."
1: Footnotes are basically the same literary device as parenthetical asides, but isn't it fun to poke at academia's tropes?
Related links:
Got a news tip for Paste? E-mail news@pastemagazine.com.


Be the first to comment
Click to leave a comment.