Early in Ken Burns’ new mega-documentary, The National Parks: America’s Best Idea, a mythic figure appears. At first, he isn’t named (“he called himself an ‘unknown nobody,’” the narrator intones), and the otherwise twangy score settles into gentle piano chords. After a lyrical interlude, the man is finally identified as John Muir, a vagrant Scotsman who entered the Yosemite Valley in the late 1860s and died five decades later as one of the central reasons it remains preserved today.
Burns—the legendary documentarian known for The Civil War, Jazz and Baseball—frames
Muir as a naturalist miracle who arrived precisely when the country
needed one most. Today, Burns says, “we’ve superimposed our sort of
conservation-environmental mindset” on our national parks. “Which is
perfectly all right,” he’s careful to add. “But at the heart of the
national-park compact, I think, is that they’re ultimately
transformational places at a uniquely individual level.”
That personal connection to nature, Burns says, helped set in motion the parks’ history, which his six-part, 12-hour National Parks
(set to debut Sept. 27 on PBS) traces over 150 years. The series opens
with hypnotic images of live volcanoes forming new land on the ocean’s
edge. More than any other Burns series, National Parks includes
large sections that focus on nothing but massive natural vistas—a
gesture for viewers to think of the national parks not as dad-mandated
family-vacation spots but as some of the most quintessential places on
our soil.
The preserves are “an utterly American invention” still unique in the
world. “They provide a glance into the primeval,” Burns says. “How
things once were. It touches in us something very elemental, and we all
respond in different ways. Even those people who just sort of drive
through the parks.”
Burns—who is so influential in his field that Apple named an iMovie editing feature after him—says that Parks underscores an idea he’s explored in all of his movies. “I think,” he
says, “looking back, you begin to see that I’ve made the same film over
and over again. Each one asks a deceptively simple question: Who are
we? Who are these strange and complicated people who like to call
themselves Americans?”
In Parks’ case, that meant exploring the contradictory tendencies of the parks’
earliest American visitors at the height of westward expansion in the
19th century. “This is the human impulse,” Burns says with a muted
laugh. “We look at a river, and we say ‘dam.’
We look at a beautiful
canyon, and we think, ‘What mineral can be extracted from that place?’
But there’s also a parallel impulse that says, ‘Why can’t we save
this?’”

> The preserves are “an utterly American
> invention” still unique in the world.
We have National Parks in Canada, as well as Provincial parks.
About the only thing that compares to Yosemite in my mind is the shore of Pacific Rim National Park in Tofino. Those are the two places in the world where I feel most...whole.
"who is so influential in his field that Apple named an iMovie editing feature after him"
Paste, please inform me that this is a fresh off the farm blogger you hired. Are you kidding me? Jeffrey Bloomer's journalistic sense is obviously drinking the Apple Kool-Aid and probably heading to Lenox to show off his new apps. Having an editing feature of a computer program named after him incontestably means that Ken Burns is influential? How ridiculous a claim. Perhaps the writer would prefer a Michal Bay Robot effect or a Hitchcock dolly zoom.
Ha, Matt, as it happens, I have a PC. I do think Ken Burns' influence is incontestable, though. By mentioning iMovie, I was simply pointing to how the slow-zoom effect on still photos (which Burns helped make mainstream in documentaries) is now so pervasive that it's become an auto-function on popular editing software.
I've got you. That makes sense. Sorry for the sarcastic misunderstanding.