The business sense in Hollywood of late is the inability of any star, save Will Smith, to open a movie. Names like Julia Roberts, Tom Cruise, Jim Carrey—who once demanded $25 million along with profit-sharing deals with studios—are now a fleeting shadow of what fiscal power they once held.
But then The Proposal opens to $34 million in June. The lone explanation for its unexpected success? Sandra Bullock, the star of a decade of hit-or-miss movies that have often led to long-winded musing on her career. Then, somewhat jarringly, Bullock’s crass parable The Blind Side opens to similar numbers against New Moon, the infallible adolescent franchise. Cut to week three, last weekend, as The Blind Side becomes No. 1 over perhaps the most anticipated movie of the year at the box office.
Is this a renaissance of the old-school star, or simply good marketing? Whatever the case, “Sandra Bullock” now is one of the most marketable names in Hollywood. This trend is curious not only because she was once splayed as the star of mediocre studio throwaways, but because her name alone seems to have elevated these clearly derivative movies into some of the best-selling titles of the year.
Granted,
Here it is: Sandra Bullock is a brand, and we’re happy to congratulate her agents on making her one. But the idea that a single person sells movies—whether it be her or any of the other once-marquee names—is still fairly reliable. If nothing else, Bullock may have proven that a new Hollywood adage that devalues stars is premature in this trend-obsessed age when marketing campaigns still rely on well-known names to get off the ground.
Got news tips for Paste? Email news@pastemagazine.com.

I saw the movie and didn't see one thing crass about it... Not really sure where that cheap shot came from.
The success of the Blind Side, IMO, has little to do with Sandra Bullock, although she gave a great performance. It's a solid movie that appeals to a very diverse audience that came out at a good time. That's what it boils down to. The diversity is astounding... Christians are hyping it like crazy, and that's a huge group in the US, country music fans will want to go because of Tim McGraw, and women can convince the men in their lives to go see it because it is sort of about football. Lastly, it's good for families, and so coming out during the holidays when everyone is getting together was the perfect time for it to hit. The movie had lots of things going for it but I don't think it's SB. :)
i dont think the movie will be that huge at the box office had sandra's role been given to another actress. admit it or not, it is partly because of sandra.
A note on crass and "The Blind Side." I saw the movie and thought it was regrettable. My issue wasn't with the cast but with the social politics. The characters are distinguished from each other without a shred of complexity -- white and black, rich and not, chosen and doomed. The movie exploits the divisions that it supposedly tries to argue against, and for what? "Inspiration"? For whom?
I agree with the previous comment... "crass" is completely unwarrented. Formulaic, sure... but the movie had a lot more going for it then merely Sandra Bullock. And "Sandy Bullock"? Could you be a little more patronizing, because I definitely read Paste hoping to find snobby writers making sweeping judgements based on a personal adversion to a particular actor or actress. Oh wait, that's not true at all...
Try again please.
"Sandy" was a typo. Thanks for the catch, Sarah.