Director: Floria Sigismondi
Writers: Floria Sigismondi
Cinematographer: Benoît Debie
Starring: Kristen Stewart, Dakota Fanning, Michael Shannon, Stella Maeve, Tatum O’Neal
Studio/Run Time: Apparition, 105 min.
A motley crew, a cherry bomb
Once upon a time, before The Go-Go’s lips were sealed, before the Bangles walked like an Egyptian, five schoolgirls and a Svengali record producer created an all-girl rock band called The Runaways—the title of this film about the band’s improbable rise and inevitable fall. While rock biopics can sometimes be an unwieldy beast, The Runaways is a strikingly honest look at a band that was much too young for its britches.
With 15 year old Cherie Currie (Dakota Fanning) on lead vocals and a 16 year old pre-Blackhearts Joan Jett (Kristen Stewart) on guitar, the band is relentlessly groomed in a ramshackle trailer by producer Kim Fowley (Michael Shannon), who goes as far as having boys throw dog feces and garbage at the girls as they perform, just to toughen them up. When the band hits the road, their shows become an extension of the fearlessness that Fowley injects into the girls. Director Floria Sigismondi made a superlative casting decision with Shannon as the crazed Fowley, and in making the eccentric engineer a pivotal character. As with films like Revolutionary Road and Shotgun Stories, Shannon proves to be one of today’s finest actors. Like a glammed-up drill sergeant, he bullies and barks and molds his raw recruits.
In her finest performance to date, Fanning is Cherie, walking the fine line between innocence and rebellion. She pouts like Marilyn and struts like Bowie, an overt sexuality juxtaposed with her own inexperience and immaturity. She arrives to her Runaways audition as a naïve and insecure kid, but with Fowley’s coaching and Jett’s coddling, she becomes a full-fledged frontwoman for a skyrocketing, badass band. But the duo’s education starts and stops with the performance; offstage, they’re basically left to fend for themselves. And with only their sexually-exploitative road manager for family, the girls fall into a life of sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll never intended for 15 year olds. Sigismondi doesn’t try to stretch our credulity with deep dialogue or explanations—Fanning’s keen balance of moxie and world-weariness provides exposition enough.
Stewart is a fitting Jett, brooding her way through scenes much like she’s done in every film she’s made. Jett’s transition from Runaway to solo star serves as the obligatory sequence that sets up a too-tidy conclusion. But it works well enough for rock and roll. The Runaways’ magic wasn’t just in the music, or the producer, or the novelty of five lady rockers during disco’s heyday. It was the chemistry of its separate parts. Shannon, Fanning and Stewart are the lodestone that pulls this film together, much like The Runaways themselves.
Watch the trailer for The Runaways:

Dakota Fanning joins Runaways biopic with Kristen…
Twilight star Stewart to play Joan Jett…
Question for the reviewer: Were you alive and old enough to not only know and understand what 'Rock & Roll' was, but who the Runaways were as well?
More than likely, the answer is a resounding NO!!!, so that being said, it makes no sense to have reviewers of THIS movie not be old enough to know the Runaways music PERSONALLY.
Why? Because everything I've read about this piece of excrement passed off as a "movie" doesn't even come close to what the band and their music was about. Stewart & Fanning? Not only were they not alive back in the day, but neither were their PARENTS, so why cast them? For the "youth" look? Computers and technology can fix that.
Bottom line is that Hollywood and their twisted and delusional, uber-leftist, PC mentality screwed this movie up and not only will I never see it, but I'm recommending to everyone I know and who reads my blog to refuse to see it and to tell all their friends as well and so on. If I can do anything to kill this crappy waste of celluloid, I will as it sickens me that Joan Jett was supposedly "on board" as a consultant, but I'm assuming that, as is always the case in Hollywood, they paid her enough to "know when to talk and when to keep her mouth shut", so this will undoubtably be couched in a PC mentality that didn't exist back then.
Should have stuck with an actual documentary. Much better idea and way more respect given than what this piece of excrement could ever dream of giving.
*looks at previous comment*
Looks like someone's a litte biased...
Based on your review, my interest has been slightly piqued - but I'm still waiting on some more trustworthy sources before seeking this one out.
Also, is it just me - or, even in the trailer alone, does it seem like they've taken some (incidental, perhaps) cues from Whip It?
I'll be surprised if this movie can surpass that one.
We shall see!
Ok, thirteenburn:
All of the people who WERE alive when the Runaways were first making it big are now AGED. People get older. Since it IS a movie and NOT a documentary, which is a great idea by the way, casting has to be limited to younger people. Cherie Currie was 15 when she was discovered at the Sugar Shack by Kim Fowley and Joan Jett, while Jett herself was only 1 year older. They started the band as teenagers, and that is what the movie-makers are trying to portray. You have to have kids portray kids for this movie to work. The Runaways seemed to be so raw, and their age made all the difference.
And a documentary HAS been made about The Runaways, if that is what you're looking for. It was made partially by one of the previous members herself, Vicki Blue. It is called Edgeplay: a film about the Runaways. And it contained all the members of the band except Joan Jett. You should watch it, it's really good.
Now I am 18 years old, so I obviously was not alive during the time when the Runaways were around. But that does not mean I am not interested in them. I love their music and I LOVE their story. I have read Cherie Currie's memoir and watched the documentary and done all I can to inform myself about the actual facts before I see this movie. And I WILL see it. I'm not saying it's not going to be flawed. I know that many of the things that happened to both Cherie and the band were not put in the movie because they were "too dark." But at the same time, it's a movie. I really hope that the movie does the band justice. BUT, I will SEE the movie before I make that judgement. You should not put down a movie and call it things such as "excrement" before you even see it.
The Runaways were a great band, and just because I was not around when the band was actually formed does not mean that I do not enjoy their music, considering it was formed by timeless teenage energy. ALSO, just because Kristen Stewart and Dakota Fanning were not around in the time of the band does not mean that they are going to bring this movie down. I have not seen the movie yet...it has not come to my area yet and will not come until April 9th. BUT, I have been looking forward to it for quite some time, and I feel sure that their performances will be great. Joan Jett coached Stewart for this role, you know. Things were re-created for this movies authenticity, such as Currie's white corset and Jett's red jumpsuit. And I don't know if you have read Cherie Currie's memoir, but it states that she, Joan Jett, and Sandy West, before she passed away, all had their hearts set on making a film about the Runaways based on Currie's memoir. And Jett's involvement was volentary. PLEASE. Next time, before criticising something that you haven't seen or even know much about, get your facts straight, and do not make uncertified judgements.
Some of your readers may find my recent radio show, Tribute To The Runaways, an interesting listen. It explores the band's music, solo music and bands that have benefited from their groundbreaking work. It can be streamed for free at http://www.neatnetnoise.com.
Thanks!