It’s interesting that one of the most Tumblr’d thing of late is not a picture of a cat wearing aviators or a video of some old guy dancing; it’s news about a book which came out in June, All My Friends Are Dead, which is about, well, dead things. In short.
It’s a coffee-table-book-but-not, a children’s book not really intended for children and an 80+ page collection of simple illustrations alongside simple narration. For those lamenting the recent demise of the Triceratops in our collective unconscious or still smarting from the death of Pluto as the ninth planet in the solar system (because both of these things are a kind of death, even if they aren’t technically death), Avery Monsen and Jory John’s book is a respite and a chance to come to terms with those losses, because, really, at least your friends didn’t all expire last Tuesday.
Check out the trailer for the book (which gave us a giggle)…
…and peruse the first few pages below.
Click an image to see it full size. To move to the next image, click on the image or use the right arrow key.
Got news tips for Paste? Email news@pastemagazine.com.

Pluto as a planet in our solar system is NOT dead. The writers of this book should have done their homework before stating one side of an ongoind debate as fact, when this is not the case.
Only four percent of the IAU voted on the controversial demotion, and most are not planetary scientists. Their decision was immediately opposed in a formal petition by hundreds of professional astronomers led by Dr. Alan Stern, Principal Investigator of NASA’s New Horizons mission to Pluto. One reason the IAU definition makes no sense is it says dwarf planets are not planets at all! That is like saying a grizzly bear is not a bear, and it is inconsistent with the use of the term “dwarf” in astronomy, where dwarf stars are still stars, and dwarf galaxies are still galaxies. Also, the IAU definition classifies objects solely by where they are while ignoring what they are. If Earth were in Pluto’s orbit, according to the IAU definition, it would not be a planet either. A definition that takes the same object and makes it a planet in one location and not a planet in another is essentially useless. Pluto is a planet because it is spherical, meaning it is large enough to be pulled into a round shape by its own gravity--a state known as hydrostatic equilibrium and characteristic of planets, not of shapeless asteroids held together by chemical bonds. These reasons are why many astronomers, lay people, and educators are either ignoring the demotion entirely or working to get it overturned.