A book that never gets its balance
In this follow-up to his encyclopedic Bicycle: A History, Herlihy eschews color photos and glossy pages in an attempt to build a historical narrative surrounding turn-of-the-20th-century American cyclist Frank Lenz, who was murdered while traversing a politically unstable Turkey. The story equally concerns William Sachtleben, another “globe girdler,” who eventually accepts the task of searching out Lenz’s remains.
Although Herlihy clearly did his research, he fails to sift out and emphasize potentially engaging historical elements, and the narrative pedals too hard, becoming a blur of unmediated tidbits. The two interludes of black-and-white photos prove more interesting than the text itself, which falls victim to trite descriptions and repetitive transitions.
While the book will probably find an audience in die-hard fans of cycling or belle epoque culture, those looking for the “epic tale” advertised on the book’s cover will ultimately find themselves wishing for a better set of wheels.

Jonathan Safran Foer's Nonfiction Book, Eating Animals,…
Terrible review. No context, insights, critical thinking, or textual excerpts that allow readers to draw any conclusions of their own. This "reviewer" does a disservice to the author and to his own readers. The editors at Paste might consider passing John Updike's "Reviewing 101" around the office:
1. Try to understand what the author wished to do, and do not blame him for not achieving what he did not attempt.
2. Give him enough direct quotation--at least one extended passage--of the book's prose so the review's reader can form his own impression, can get his own taste.
3. Confirm your description of the book with quotation from the book, if only phrase-long, rather than proceeding by fuzzy precis.
4. Go easy on plot summary, and do not give away the ending.
5. If the book is judged deficient, cite a successful example along the same lines, from the author's ouevre or elsewhere. Try to understand the failure. Sure it's his and not yours?