A new Arcade Fire record came out last week, and at this point it's a well-noted fact that it contains only a few scraps of the anthemic urgency for which the band, on its two previous albums, had become so well-loved. At the risk of coming off like One Of Those People Who Just Wishes They'd Make A Hundred Albums Like Funeral, I will admit: I missed the bombast, too. But only a little bit, and only until I realized what, exactly, was getting the band so worked up in those moments that they do, in fact, get so worked up. And then I just wished they'd never even bothered.
What whips the seven members of Arcade Fire into a lather these days? What are they building up to in those few would-be wonderful, fleeting outbursts of earnest, desperate musical passion? Not what they used to let loose on, not death or religion or rebuilding after the fall or fathers taking it as God's will to exploit his children or cars or space ships or anything else so ostentatious. No. The band's new record is called The Suburbs and it is pretty much just about the suburbs—or, at least, the vague concerns that a somewhat-thoughtful middle-class white person might experience during and after residing there: a dueling sense of loathing and nostalgia, the urgency of leaving and the weird pain of returning, the adolescent battle of giving yourself over to the sweet anesthesia of apathy and cul-de-sacs named after long-decimated forests versus holding tight to some sense of yourself as the crush and rush of adulthood tries to strip away your precious purity and idealism. Oh, also, because this is Arcade Fire, there are bombs falling somewhere. Maybe real ones. Maybe metaphorical ones. Maybe both!
I find this just about as compelling as any non-musical discussion of the same topic—which is to say, kind of? Because I grew up in the suburbs and had those same fears and still go back often and drive down the same roads I learned to drive on and experience bemusement at all the new, identical neighborhoods that have wheedled in where there used to be family farms and lovely stands of trees. The last few years I spent in the suburbs were the years immediately following Sept. 11, 2001, and so my time there was marred, too, by fears of bombs and waking up in a field of decimated tract-houses. My town was divided by a river, like the town in The Suburbs seems to be, and there were mountains too—mountains beyond mountains, even. My suburban life also had its share of vague signifiers—parents' car keys, parks, malls, downtowns, unsent letters—but, unlike the suburbs of this album, which are seemingly populated exclusively by material cliches, that wasn't all it had. My suburbs were filled with people, too—characters, names, faces and personalities I recognized and cared about, despite whatever malaise I might've felt living there. Sometimes it even seemed like there might be some sort of narrative arc forming out of the muddle of our shared everyday life, or at least some series of anecdotes that could be strung together to tell some larger story about the place. And there was, at least, a sense of place.
It's not that I wish the lyrics of these songs more closely reflected my experience. I just wish they reflected some experience—any at all. The album has eight covers, each a mottled photograph taken from inside an old car; in each version, the car is the same, but the view is different—different parking lots, driveways, brick ranch houses, vinyl-sided tract homes, palm trees, leafless oaks. Perhaps this explains it, then: Aesthetically and lyrically, the album is striving for some sense of universality. Lead singer/songwriter Win Butler has boiled his words down to what he sees as most essential, most commonplace, in the sad, shared lives of American suburban youth, as if the endless looping roads and stripmalls has rendered them all—us all—of relating to any material or emotional details beyond their own small lives.
Even the trademark Arcade Fire apocalyptica is frustratingly vague, though it does serve the vital function of upping the album's stakes from “nonexistent” to “pretty low.” Without all the bombs falling nearby, without whatever awful thing has happened in San Francisco, without the times and how they are repeatedly said to be changing, this is just a series of boring stories about boring people being bored in a boring place. But with all the inexplicit dangers thrown in, it becomes a series of boring stories about boring people being bored in a boring place when really they should probably be scared out of their minds. This is so frustrating that it incites a kind of meta-panic in the heart of the listener, like watching a kid chase a ball out into the street, and there's a car coming, and the driver's not watching, and now the kid's running after a butterfly, and the car's getting closer and closer and closer and—
Nothing ever happens.
The band has cared so damn much in the past that it's worth asking whether this is supposed to be some kind of damning commentary on the toxic irony and apathy of “kids today,” but they're not any more spooked themselves. As the bombs are falling, they're fussing about the pretensions of crossed-armed art-school kids and rueing poor neighborhood planning. Shouldn't they be freaking out? We know they can do it! Who else will earnestly alert us to the impending doom of modern life, in three-minute anthem form or otherwise, if not Arcade Fire? Who else will tell us the sky is falling? I'd say they slaughtered and roasted Chicken Little, but they're probably all vegetarians, so I don't even know what's going on. Win Butler's looking a little dark under the eyes, lately—maybe it's an iron deficiency? Mono? Carbon monoxide leak?
It's not that I wish this record was Funeral, necessarily. I just wish it was some other, better record than what it actually is. The songs sound OK, but also like they could be played by pretty much any other band with more than a few members and a passing acquaintance with strings-arranger Owen Pallet. But then, to borrow a line from Jon Pareles, the lyrics make me wish I didn't understand English. There were moments on Neon Bible that made me cringe ("MTV" rhymed with "World War III," oh boy) but most of the new songs hardly deserve that minute calorie expenditure. There are perhaps enough compelling lines and ideas on the record to fill up a slight EP, but even then I might wonder why the band even bothered.
As a songwriter, Win Butler does have a strong suit: transposing all of his bleeding-heart earnestness onto people and places mostly of his own construction, painting tender portraits of love after the fall, and perhaps even tackling some other subject matter he hasn't yet considered, like, I dunno, the planets of our solar system. But he doesn't seem all that comfortable writing songs that explore anything resembling any unobscured aspect of his own actual life. Here, he sings about the streets where he learned to drive, about revisiting old parks, about driving around trying—and failing—to find the house he grew up in. Knowing that he and his brother (and bandmate) Will grew up in the interminable sprawl of The Woodlands, Texas, and that the rest of the band claims roots in various suburban outposts across Canada, it's fair to assume this is least a loosely fictionalized account of something he's done or thought of doing. But we learn nothing, really, of his life on those streets or in that park or in that house—what happened there, who he knew, whether he was ever happy. We don't even really know how he feels about going back; all we get is the lyrical equivalent of him returning to these old places and staring blankly at them. Either he has no thoughts about them, or he doesn't care to dignify them with comment. Either way, it doesn't make for an especially compelling pseudo-concept record.
The Suburbs is precisely the kind of album I would have been utterly enamored with the summer after my senior year in high school—when I was still so worried about war, when I was grappling with leaving all the places I was so familiar with and trying to figure out if they were landmarks or just hitching posts, when I generally demanded less depth from everything. “We Used to Wait,” Butler's ode to the lost art of letter-writing, would have struck me to my core—not just because of all the letters I was planning to write my old friends once I moved into the dorms that fall, but also for its “like a patient on a table” nod to T.S. Eliot's “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock,” which those friends and I pretty much agreed was the pinnacle of the English language along with every other smartish eighteen-year-old girl in America. If I'd heard Regine Chassagne crooning, so defiantly and so sadly, “They heard me singing and they told me to stop / Quit these pretentious things and just punch the clock," I would have gravely nodded along, girding my loins to better face the adult reality that undoubtedly awaited me.
I would have loved this album then, and I would now probably think of my then-love for the album the same way I think of my then-love for so many other things—with a chuckle and a sigh of relief that those feelings have passed. (Kind of like Ben Folds' Rockin' the Suburbs, an album that takes a more wry, thumbnail-sketch approach to a similar subject.) At that time, though, I thought the things I loved then would be the things I loved always. (Actually, whatever. I still love Rockin' the Suburbs.) But if I'd tried to live rest of my life by whatever code my teenaged self might have conscripted for me, if I'd kept fighting those same battles as if they would always be the most important ones, I would have lost my mind—or, worse, just become an incredibly dull human being.
Which is another problem with The Suburbs—how the few concerns the album does have seem to be nothing more than adolescent holdovers that've festered and grown into the defining struggle of its adult life: Apathy, clock-punching, not-fitting-in, wasted beauty. It doesn't directly scoff at the people who didn't bother to fight the sprawl, who never left to be able to make a hesitant return, but it clearly values freedom and purity above all else. Who's really free here, though? The ones who stayed, who tore down the old buildings and built new ones, who populate the tract-homes and drab offices with no conflict in their hearts, who likely don't think very much about their lives but who go on living it, day to day? Or those that think themselves more noble for having wrested their lives from suburbia's grasp but return time and time again to stare blankly into the abyss of their former lives, apparently feeling so moved by the great gaping void of their experience that they write great gaping voids of records about it? Wasn't the point to move on to something greater, to sculpt your life in your own way, to free yourself from the bored cops and tessellating malls and miles of miles of identical nothingness?
To be sure, there are things you can try but never fully evacuate yourself from. Death is one of those things. Religion, too. And Arcade Fire has fantastically and clumsily tackled both before, to at least somewhat rousing ends. These things are built into the complicated circumstances of our birth; they are not physical places, they are not able to be escaped, they will always hang like huge white birds around our necks—and so it seems a sensible thing to do, to sing many desperate, beautiful, wonderful songs about them, like this band has done, even though they will only ever stare blankly back at you, unimpressed. That's all suburbia will ever do, too. But with it, at least, you can turn your back, climb into your mother's car and leave it all behind.
Rachael Maddux is Paste’s associate editor. Her column appears at PasteMagazine.com every Monday. She recommends the new Frontier Ruckus record to anyone looking for a more intimately engaging portrait of the weirdness of suburbia that also makes use of the phrase "dead malls."

That was a lot of reading about a lot of nothing, you seemed to go off on a tangent for far too long and not once did you talk about the actual music and you reference 1 of the songs on the album. There is more to the album than the lyrics, although they make for a very important part the album as a whole is really easy to listen to, with stand out songs like "Rococo" and "Suburban War". I like my bands to progress and I loved Funeral and Neon Bible but when I saw the band live just before the release of this album I couldn't wait for it. I think it stands as a pretty damn good album all the way through, yes it is different and yes it is more sedated but it is still great and new and fun to listen to. I felt like your review of the album was more about you delving into the way you grew up and less about the music.
This was the most astute piece of writing about this album that I've read yet. I do like "Rococo" and "City With No Children" because I feel that those two songs are the only really personal ones that engage in any self evaluation or really anything besides paint-by-numbers angst. And I can't wait for Kanye or Lil Wayne or Girl Talk to do something cool with the "Mountains Beyond Mountains" beat. But like you, I mostly just wish this had come out when I was 16.
disclaimer: i am writing this without having listened to this album in nearly enough depth. but i just felt strongly that this article is how i felt about this album from the second i heard what the title would be.
...
i think the purpose of your article wasn't to review the album... hence not speaking of the songs and lyrics specifically... but more of a piece on WHEN things like growing up in suburbia would typically affect you. its interesting because i love arcade fire but i almost feel nervous to listen to it in depth because i don't WANT it to evoke the feelings that i had when i was younger... feelings about who you are and how you so-called break free from how you might have grown up.
on the other hand, it would be interesting to listen to it and feel like you have moved past this. therefore, using this album as a sort of HELL YA to yourself for not feeling stuck in that punch-the-clock apathy and overall boredom anymore.
maybe i should just listen to it already.
either way, i enjoyed reading this.
Rachael, I was so disappointed when I got the notion you didn't like this album. I instantly wanted to dismiss your argument but being a fan of some of your previous pieces I thought I would continue to read.
At the end you had me on your side and I agree with you.
However I do really enjoy the album. I do believe it is a very good album and one of this year’s best. It is just not as good as other Arcade Fire records.
I suggest you give the album another try in maybe six months.
I thought you made a good point here and I do believe this is what Win Butler had in mind.
"Lead singer/songwriter Win Butler has boiled his words down to what he sees as most essential, most commonplace, in the sad, shared lives of American suburban youth, as if the endless looping roads and stripmalls has rendered them all—us all—of relating to any material or emotional details beyond their own small lives. "
Good review, if overlong. Kinda mirrors the album in that respect.
@Jim, @Brad...really, guys? It's a decent album, but c'mon...idiot? Schmuck? Grow up.
Regardless of what you may think, an album is an entire unit, and lyrics are absolutely a part of that, ESPECIALLY when the entire conceit of the record is based around a concept. Arcade Fire do concepts, for better or for worse, and sorry, if the execution of said concept comes across as tired and old and, frankly, boring, then that is an issue.
The lyrics of this album leave nothing to the imagination--everything is far too literal; there is no room for any kind of interpretation. Compare this to the "concept" on The Antler's "Hospice"--that album was presented in such a way as to allow the listener to make whatever connections he or she wanted (within the loose framework presented). "The Suburbs" doesn't do that (at all), and it suffers because of it.
That being said, I really enjoy certain songs on this album. As a matter of fact, I think the first and last thirds are pretty great. But the whole album sags in the middle under the weight of its heavy-handed conceit, and because of this, this is a weaker album than its predecessors. If it were five songs shorter, it'd be better than "Neon Bible"--but it's not, so it's not!
"when I was still so worried about war, when I was grappling with leaving all the places I was so familiar with and trying to figure out if they were landmarks or just hitching posts, when I generally demanded less depth from everything."...Wow. Nice to know that "worrying about war" has no depth and that you've matured enough not to have a social conscious about such things. I'm about your age as well and I still "worry about war" and also am, maybe for far too long, still trying to find my geographic fitting place and looking back at those I grew up in kind of strangely. I think the new Arcade album is bold, brilliant, deep, and their strongest work to date. But to give you a nod, I'm with you at least half of the time...you love the new Lissie album which I do as well and on your recent article about getting no reaction to the latest work from admired artists, I'm with you on Band of Horses and somewhat with the new Hold Steady though it is growing one me...
Rachel don't listen to that guy who said lyrics don't matter. I've been listening to music for more years than I care to admit and the lyrics were always the most important thing to me. Frankly, I never thought Arcade Fire was all it's supposed to be cracked up tobe. Boring.