The 2010 Academy Awards were just announced, which means film fans now have the opportunity to engage in their favorite annual pastime: complaining about and calling attention to the films overlooked by those nefarious Academy elites, ensconced as they are in their Star Chamber of film criticism. And no matter what kind of movies you’re particular to, there’s some grade-A grousing to be done about this year’s nominees.
1. Sam Rockwell (Moon) – Actor in a Leading Role
Leading the pack is Sam Rockwell’s role as the curator of an isolated moon base, a performance equally thrilling and inspired (doubly so because he was pulling double-duty for a large portion of the film). And it was no accident that this sci-fi gem didn’t receive a single Oscar nod; Sony refused to back it with a single screener or press kit over fears of piracy.
2. Anvil! The Story of Anvil – Documentary Feature
There’s no good reason why this universally-loved and critically-acclaimed doc about the Metal Band That Could didn’t earn a single nod. Of course, judging by this year’s Best Documentary list, Anvil is in pretty good company as far as senseless snubs go.
3. Clint Eastwood (Invictus) – Directing
Clint has probably earned enough Oscar nods and statues for several lifetimes, so we’re sure he’s not losing any sleep over this one. At least this breaks the trend of the last few years where Clint Eastwood’s mere presence in a director’s chair earned him a nomination
4. (500) Days of Summer – Writing (Original Screenplay)
The cast and crew of 500 Days managed to assemble a unique and charming take on a very, very worn-out genre, thanks in large part to the whip-smart script. After earning love and praise from the Writer’s Guild and Golden Globes, it was expected to at least snag a nod, but that’s show-business!
5. Ponyo – Animated Feature Film
Yes, it was already a given that two of the slots for Best Animated were reserved for Disney’s much-ballyhooed return to hand-drawn animation and whatever Pixar happened to be releasing this year, making the odds even longer for this whimsical adaptation of a Hans Christian Anderson story. But considering that Ponyo was one of director Hayao Miyazaki’s finest films, it’s a truly unfortunate exclusion; a sad reflection of the Academy’s perennial disdain for foreign cinema.

I'm not sure I would call most of these egregious... certainly not anything like last year's joke of a best song category. I don't think Clint Eastwood did anything special with Invictus, I was actually relieved he wasn't nominated just because he's Clint Eastwood. Sam Rockwell was amazing but every other nominee was better. I think nominations went pretty well this year. (still upset about 10 best picture noms, but what am I gonna do? write my thoughts on some website? what would that accomplish?)
I'd certainly add That Evening Sun for Best Film, Best Actor (Hal Holbrook) and Best Song (Patterson Hood).
Agree totally on the Sam Rockwell, Anvil, and (500)Days snubs. I also think it would've been great to see Sharlto Copely get a nod for best actor for his turn in District 9. He was fantastic. Glad to see D9 get some major noms beyond effects (which will be an Avatar bloodbath, deservedly so, I guess). I really hope they get a statue for best editing...all the different elements of that film (docu-style, security cams, live action) were superbly edited together.
Also, in animated short films no "Partly Cloudy" is a pretty big deal, even if no one seems to care but me.
I kind of think Matt Damon got a nomination for the wrong movie. I thought he was great in The Informant!, but it doesn't look like that got any attention.
WHAT ABOUT WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE? I was so angry when it got snubbed at the Golden Globes, and now with the stupid disqualification for Karen O for original score, I'm still mad.
Not a bad selection generally, although this is a list that could go on for days, but this -
3. Clint Eastwood (Invictus) – Directing
Clint has probably earned enough Oscar nods and statues for several lifetimes, so we’re sure he’s not losing any sleep over this one. At least this breaks the trend of the last few years where Clint Eastwood’s mere presence in a director’s chair earned him a nomination
is one of the strangest things I've ever read. What qualifies this effort beyond simply including him for the sake of including him, which you actually go on to condemn?
Purely in terms of the direction, this seems like the least noteworthy thing he's ever done. What's the snub argument?