advertisement
Home.News.Features.Reviews.Blogs.Calendar.Audio/Video.Store.







Pages tagged “philip seymour hoffman”

Oscar Buzz: Who's ahead in this year's key races?

|
oscars.jpg

There's a surprisingly gargantuan Internet faction dedicated to predicting who will be up for film's most coveted prize, the Academy Award. Publications like Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, Entertainment Weekly, Los Angeles Times and New York Times all have Oscar blogs that obsessively trail the fluctuations in buzz amongst the year's top films. That's not to mention stand-alone sites like Awards Daily and In Contention, or well-known bloggers like Jeff Wells, Dave Poland and Anne Thompson. Even Roger Ebert has devoted a wealth of recent ink on the subject. But, the truth is, no matter how much someone knows, it's still just a wild guessing game.
Here's a look at the films and performances that seem to be ahead in the eight major categories, at this vantage point. Take note: this is merely speculation about who will be nominated, not who will win. It's also just that: speculation.

BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY

vicky_cristina.jpg

1. Woody Allen, Vicky Cristina Barcelona
2. Dustin Lance Black, Milk
3. Jenny Lumet, Rachel Getting Married
4. Thomas McCarthy, The Visitor
5. Mike Leigh, Happy-Go-Lucky

Strong Contenders: Nick Schenk, Gran Torino; Robert D. Siegel, The Wrestler; Andrew Stanton, Wall-E;
Longshots: Charlie Kaufman, Synecdoche, New York; Martin McDonagh, In Bruges; Joel and Ethan Coen, Burn After Reading

Allen has been nominated 14 times as a screenwriter. He's a shoo-in. Likewise, Milk, The Visitor and Rachel Getting Married are exactly the type of indie films typically embraced in this category. The fifth slot seems wide open. The Academy loves Leigh, so he gets the edge (see: Vera Drake, Secrets & Lies).

BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY

slumdog.jpg

1. Simon Beaufoy, Slumdog Millionaire
2. Eric Roth, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
3. John Patrick Shanley, Doubt
4. Justin Haythe, Revolutionary Road
5. David Hare, The Reader

Strong Contenders:
Peter Morgan, Frost/Nixon; Jonathan and Christopher Nolan, The Dark Knight
Longshot: Clayton Frohman and Edward Zwick, Defiance

The lack of contenders assures this category will be stock full of films also in the running for best picture. Any combination of the eight picks above sound plausible, but word on Frost/Nixon is still soft and The Dark Knight doesn't seem to be particularly lauded for its writing. The Reader seems likely, even if the film doesn't score in any other major category.

Ctrl-V

Philip Seymour Hoffman animated film to open Sundance

|
Despite recent controversies, preparations for the Sundance Film Festival are in full swing, prompting the announcement of the annual event's Jan. 15 opening night film: the Aussie animated import Mary and Max, featuring the voices of Philip Seymour Hoffman, Toni Collette and Eric Bana. The selection is a major coup for the film, considering the attention lavished on recent opening night films, like this year's rather slept-on tragicomedy In Bruges.

Articles

Categories:

New Dark Knight sequel rumors shot down almost instantly

|
Here we go again. It hasn't even been two months since The Dark Knight opened in theaters and it's already a chore to keep up with the hype on the sequel—which, by the way, hasn't even been confirmed yet. Who? When? How? Cher as Catwoman!? (Or is that Angelina Jolie?) 

Articles

Categories:

Philip Seymour Hoffman to direct play in London

|
Former Paste cover boy and Academy Award-winning actor Philip Seymour Hoffman (remember 2006's Capote?) is set to direct a play in London's West End at Trafalgar Studios.

Articles

Categories:

Charlie Kaufman's Synecdoche, NY in talks with Sony

|
More than two months after the 2008 Cannes Film Festival came to a close and Charlie Kaufman's Synecdoche, NY startled festival-goers out of their overstimulated movie-going apathy, the word is that the film will finally be picked up for distribution

Articles

Categories:

Philip Seymour Hoffman gets on The Boat that Rocked

|

What do you get when you put Philip Seymour Hoffman on a boat with lauded rom-com writer Richard Curtis and Ed from Shaun of the Dead? And no, it's not the Mayercraft Carrier...

Universal Pictures and Working Title Films just announced that they will be moving forward with production on the historically-grounded comedy The Boat that Rocked. The film is based on the true story of pirate radio stations that broadcasted from boats off the coast of England during the late 1960s when BBC was playing a mere two hours of rock music per day.

Radio Rock, as it is called in the film, broadcasted its sonic goodness 24-7 to fill the void left by standard (ahem, legal) British radio. And by the history books, half the population of Britain, or 25 million people, listened. Kind of like an old-school, radio version of the original Napster, but so much cooler because these guys were on boats.

Bill Nighy plays a different kind of pirate as Quentin, the ringleader of the radio charlatans taking over the airwaves. Nighy is set against Hoffman, who plays the formidable American DJ the Count, and Rhys Ifans, who portrays the UK’s favorite DJ, Gavin, who is trying to reclaim his throne. Nick Frost (the aforementioned Ed) plays Dave, the hilarious co-broadcaster, and Kenneth Branagh plays British Minister Dormandy, who tries to keep their music off the airwaves. Also appearing in the film are Tom Sturridge, Jack Davenport, Ralph Brown, Chris O'Dowd and January Jones.

Curtis wrote the script, and this will be his second time at the director’s stand; however, it is a first time for him to direct something that is not a romantic comedy. His writing credits include Love Actually, Four Weddings and a Funeral and Notting Hill, not to mention that his trophy shelf boasts an Emmy, a Writers Guild of America award and two BAFTAs.

Here's a hoping a killer, aquatically themed soundtrack is in the works. Plus, did we mention Philip Seymour Hoffman is in this one?

Related links:
Paste: Philip Seymour Hoffman: the Mad Detective
WorkingTitleFilms.com
Richard Curtis on IMDb

Got news tips for Paste? E-mail news@pastemagazine.com.


Articles

Categories:

Seymour Hoffman and Mortensen to star as cannibals?

|

There are a few ingredients that guarantee you'll secure our cabooses into a movie theater seat. In this instance, those ingredients include Philip Seymour Hoffman, Viggo Mortensen and a smidge of, wait for it, cannibals.

New York entertainment blog Vulture caught wind of the upcoming horror flick Vanikoro, which was written and directed by Xavier Gens. As the story goes, French explorer La Perouse gets shipwrecked on one of the Vanikoro islands. While most of the crew MacGyvers a boat to sail away, two stay back.

Seymour and Mortensen are "in talks" to join the cast (via Bloody-Disgusting.com). No dates for the film have been set yet.

Related links:
Paste: Charlie Wilson's War
Paste: Philip Seymour Hoffman: The Mad Detective
Paste: Eastern Promises: Crime, Tattoos and a Steam Bath

Got news tips for Paste? Email
news@pastemagazine.com.


Articles

Categories:

The Savages

|

A Pair of Aces
Hoffman and Linney's subtle dynamic carries otherwise mediocre film

Director/Writer: Tamara Jenkins
Cinematographer: W. Mott Hupfel III
Starring: Laura Linney, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Philip Bosco
Studio/Run Time: Fox Searchlight, 113 mins.

Oddly being marketed as a comedy by its distributor, The Savages is best approached as a drama with an intermittently light touch that’s generally more of a curse than a boon. Adult siblings Wendy and Jon Savage (Laura Linney and Philip Seymour Hoffman) discover that their estranged father, Lenny, has lost his home when his girlfriend of 20 years dies, something that might not register as an emergency if it weren’t for the old man’s increasing dementia, so they rush—Wendy from New York City and Jon from Buffalo—to their father’s side in Sun City, Ariz., resigned to do their bit to help him settle so they can resume their lives.

Writer/director Tamara Jenkins doesn’t fill in the entire back story, but it’s clear that Lenny was an absent father, emotionally if not physically, so his new incoherence— he barely knows who his children are—feels to Wendy and Jon like a cruel parody of something all too familiar.

Although the central conflict seems at first to be between a parent and his grown children, the far more interesting relationship is between Wendy and Jon. In one sense, they’re opposites. Wendy is flighty and hysterical where Jon is calm and aloof. In their love lives, she’s clinging to a relationship with no future, and he’s letting one go with a shrug. About their father, she feels a sense of guilt she can’t quite rationalize, but he experiences only the slightest tug of duty. She wants to find a home that’s not so depressing, but he says, look, they’re all depressing. They’re where people go to die. End of story. When they pay a visit to one home, an employee greets them in the waiting room saying, “You must be the Savages.” Jon hears a capital S, but Wendy, no doubt, hears lower-case.

Although they’re opposites, their passions are closely aligned. She’s a struggling playwright in Manhattan, while he teaches drama and is working on a book about Bertolt Brecht, the German playwright who believed that in order to educate and illuminate, a work of art should keep the audience from becoming too emotionally engaged. Jon takes a similar approach to life.

Casually but carefully, Jenkins has written two characters that play off of each other in subtle ways, and the dynamic is remarkable enough that everything else about the film pales in comparison, the David Lynch-lite montage of Arizona suburbs, the caricature of dementia, and the weird, cutesy mythology of curled toes as a signifier of impending death. Because they seem like trivial reactions to serious situations, these lesser elements drag the film through a dull slog, and they make me wish Jenkins had found another way to bring these two siblings together. For a far more insightful film on what dementia can do to relationships, see Sarah Polley’s feature directorial debut from earlier this year, Away From Her. (Polley had an interest in toes as well, but only because they were an important fragment from her characters’ shared memory. The only history Jenkins conjures is the curled toes of the witch in The Wizard of Oz.)

Part of what makes the sibling relationship in The Savages so interesting is the inspired casting. Linney and Hoffman are fine actors, of course, but they also have temperaments that run parallel to what Jenkins is exploring. Linney has played a variety of roles but seems most believable as this sort of everywoman who’s swept along by the daily tide. Hoffman, on the other hand, takes a more complex, intellectual approach to acting, and despite his girth he can disappear into the emotional hospice nurse of Magnolia, the drag queen of Flawless, the cynical Lester Bangs in Almost Famous and the title role in Capote. He’s also a movie star, someone we like to watch disappear into roles, someone we like to see “act,” someone from whom we have, at those moments, a Brechtian distance, so his appeal has an almost contradictory duality.

Jenkins takes full advantage of the contrast between her actors, and of Hoffman’s duality, to bring these characters together, letting Wendy gain a little distance from her life and letting Jon find—or perhaps just reveal—an emotional connection to his. With small steps, they move closer to each other. It’s an obvious development, I guess, and not all that deep, but it feels sincere and it emits a warmth that’s far more satisfying than whatever is given off by the father’s toes.

View the trailer for The Savages:


Articles

Categories:

Philip Seymour Hoffman

|
photo by Matthias Clamer

“Great art is about conflict
and pain and guilt and longing and love.”

—Lester Bangs in Almost Famous

IT BEGAN the moment the film screened at the Telluride Film Festival on Sep. 2, 2005. Oscar buzz. By the time Capote played at the Toronto International Film Festival a week later, the buzz had become a roar. Philip Seymour Hoffman burst to the forefront of a pack of worthy Oscar contenders (Heath Ledger in Brokeback Mountain and Joaquin Phoenix in Walk the Line) that, in any other year, would’ve dominated festival chatter. When the film opened on Sep. 30, reviewers proclaimed Hoffman’s nomination a “foregone conclusion” and “all but coronated” him Best Actor.

On the morning of Dec. 13, the noise reaches a new pitch. Hoffman, appearing on the Today Show, learns of his Golden Globe nomination. Asked for his on-the-spot reaction, the actor fumbles for words. “It’s…” He raises his eyebrows. “It’s…” He shuffles in his seat, chuckling. “I just heard. It’s sinking in.” Award season has begun in earnest.

A few hours later, when he sits down to talk with Paste, Hoffman appears relaxed, though his hair is a bit disheveled from the knit cap keeping the blustery weather at bay. We’re in a sterile conference room in a photography studio, but he’s near his West Village neighborhood and seems eager to discuss his craft without being constrained to the sound bites, quips and personal anecdotes that don’t come easy for him. It’s a respite from a day of national TV appearances and abrupt phone calls to answer that mandatory question: How does it feel?

“The press, the media—it’s a whole other world. It’s crazy,” he says. “It’s different than anything I’ve experienced, for sure. The further I get into it, it’s a whole other thing. You really don’t know what you’re feeling about it. … You do get a little lost.”

GETTING LOST IN HIS CHARACTERS is something the 38-year-old actor has excelled at for 15 years in more than 35 films. Until recently, he’s played mostly supporting roles, but that hasn’t stopped him from leaving indelible marks on audiences and critics. His big break came when he was pulled from his deli-counter job in 1992 to play opposite Al Pacino and Chris O’Donnell in Scent of a Woman. He’d never again have to make sandwiches to pay the bills. While he went on to play significant roles in blockbusters Twister and Patch Adams, Hoffman earned notoriety for his portrayal of wildly idiosyncratic characters—from the gauche assistant hitting on Mark Wahlberg’s Dirk Diggler in Boogie Nights and the forlorn masturbating phone stalker in Happiness to the transgender singer in Flawless. In 2002, Hoffman finally stepped into his first lead role with Love Liza, and the next year he followed with the titular lead in Owning Mahowny. There’s not a lackluster performance in the lot. “He’s ridiculously fun to watch,” enthuses director Cameron Crowe, who cast Hoffman as his mentor Lester Bangs in Almost Famous. “Hoffman has a mighty instinct for what makes people live, breathe, move and, most of all, think. It’s all there in his performances, with no strings showing.”

Hoffman’s recent evocation of writer Truman Capote reminds Crowe of seeing the actor first bring Bangs to life. “The first take we did was a master shot of Bangs walking up a steep hill with William Miller, just after they’d met,” he says. “Watching Hoffman walk up that hill—the very same hill I’d walked with Bangs 20-plus years earlier—I felt that chill from the actual day. It was also probably something close to what Bennett Miller must have felt on his first take with Hoffman as Capote. After all the talk and preparation, a screen life had begun. So generously true to the actual character, and yet wildly and originally Philip Seymour Hoffman.”

When Hoffman was offered the role of Capote, his initial reaction was that he wasn’t the right person to play the legendary writer, who had a thin frame, high-pitched voice and fey mannerisms. But he was intrigued by the idea of working with two friends he’s known since age 16, when he attended a summer theater program in upstate New York—director Bennett Miller and screenwriter Dan Futterman.

While reading the script, which centers on Capote’s research and writing of In Cold Blood and the impact his controversial choices had on his life, Hoffman connected with the character and story and knew he had to play the role. “It was very intriguing in a lot of ways, none really having to do with my recollections of Truman Capote, which were pretty basic. My interest has nothing to do with what people think it might be, about how he was a colorful character or the people he knew. It really was the story of an artist that was my age who was a little bit lost, not knowing what to do with himself. I felt this odd kinship with him and we probably have nothing in common. My assumptions are probably completely wrong. But that’s really what drew me to it, this idea that we were kind of the same age and I really didn’t know what to do here [either].”

Choosing roles has always been difficult for Hoffman, but this trait has become even more pronounced with age. “It has to do with certain parts or certain stories that you’ve probably done or were of interest to you when you were in your early 20s,” he explains, “and you really could give a flying f—— about them now. When you really realize that, it’s a wild thing. You’re like, ‘God, I really wanted to play that kind of role when I was 24.’ I run screaming now. So you know what you don’t want to do.

“[But] what you do want to do is still this foggy thing. The pieces just come together and you start to feel right about something. It’s a combination of something in the story and in the character.” Finding that intimate insight, as with Capote, is the key. “Usually, there’s something about it that’s probably not of interest to anyone but yourself.”

Having found a personal angle into Capote, Hoffman began five-and-a-half months of preparation. Reading, listening to and watching whatever he could (especially the Maysles brothers documentary With Love From Truman, filmed around the time of In Cold Blood’s release), he sought to get at the core of the writer, to “find the nuts and bolts of his life.” Even now, Hoffman isn’t sure he succeeded; Capote remains “very, very elusive.”

“There were so many things and it was never quite really nailed down even when we were shooting,” he says. “You could say he was Machiavellian and he was very manipulative. But you couldn’t just be those things because there’s something else. And it’ll drive you mad, because there’s always something else. And you think, he was very kind but you couldn’t just do that either.” Most people, Hoffman says, have a trace of that complexity, but you can usually find a core to build a character on. For Capote, Hoffman finally imagined it as his childhood relationship with his mother and his fear of abandonment. “He would never be left alone again, that was his bottom line. Once that was dealt with, you started to see how he could be all of those things at once because he had to be.”

Only after coming to this tentative understanding did Hoffman delve into the physicality of Capote. “It wasn’t until maybe six or eight weeks [prior to shooting] that I really began to get glimpses of Capote in Phil,” Miller says. “He would surface for moments here and there.” Even during the first week of filming, Hoffman struggled. “The shoot did not get off to an easy start. He always told me that when he starts shooting a film he feels like he’s drawing with his left hand.” By the second week, the director says, Hoffman had a breakthrough and emerged convincingly as Capote.

“Film is a very uncomfortable medium for an actor,” Hoffman says, contrasting it with theater (where the Tony nominee continues to act, direct and serve as co-artistic director of the LAByrinth Theater Company). “It’s just not conducive to doing what actors do. The first few days of shooting are like you just getting over the fact that you’re there. These people and the camera over the shoulder and the light and the boom—you’re just going crazy trying to find some kind of center of relaxation and then you can get into a rhythm and it can be very satisfying. If you do good work and it’s on film, that’s a very satisfying thing.”

Finding that rhythm in Capote required Hoffman to remain physically in character even during down times on set. “It was so different from how I am that it was important for me to stay there,” he explains. “If I laid it down, I wouldn’t want to pick it up again.” Did Hoffman find maintaining such foreign mannerisms and vocal nuances distracting from the role’s other requirements? “Oh, God yeah,” he exclaims. “You’re alone in a room and acting very badly and foolish. But you just keep going at it. I heard Joaquin had to sing those songs [in Walk the Line] and I just think, ‘F——!’ Think of the days he spent going, ‘I’m going to have to play like Johnny Cash.’ That’s heavy. Some days, you’re just, ‘Oh my God, this is f——ing hard.’ You just throw your hands up, but you just keep coming back. A lot of actors do it though, and when they do it, it’s pretty special.”

For Hoffman, achieving this level of performance is an all-consuming chore. Crowe recalls the actor’s intense focus on the Almost Famous set. “Whenever a take was done, on went Hoffman’s headphones and he was able to drown out the white noise of production. His head was facing down in concentration and all I’d hear coming from that headset was the hum of Lester’s voice.”

Hoffman says he tries to dial down this intensity at the end of the day, to treat his role as “just a job.” But his passion for his craft and his deep union with the character made it difficult. “You keep thinking about it,” Hoffman says. “Why does he do that? You keep thinking and thinking; you keep finding out more and more. And whenever you find out something, it always opens up another question. It’s like being a detective. Acting is like you’re this mad, crazy detective, and you’re on the search for a secret. You’re on the search for information, knowledge, experience. And you’re searching, you’re searching. And that’s hard to shut down.”

For Hoffman, the difficulty of playing Capote was only approached by a few of his theater roles. “There are some parts like this one that ask something of you that… they kind of make you a little crazy, make you a little mad,” he says. “You’ve got to be vulnerable and a little bit raw in a way that’s not healthy. As a person, you just don’t expose yourself in that kind of way, but in acting you do. In a role like this, there’s just something 24/7 about it. This guy existed in such a needy way that it was just impossible to protect—and ultimately that was his protection, but it wasn’t mine. Acting is tough—acting is a very hard thing to do well.”

This inner exposure sent Hoffman into a protective shell on the set. “‘Intense and to himself’ pretty well describes it,” Miller acknowledges. “He emanates a vibe that warns people to stand back. He appears extremely unapproachable.”

It was a new side to his old friend, but Miller understood. “Phil really needed to be very vulnerable and exposed, and I think that’s an uncomfortable place to live for six or seven weeks. People who were on the set watching us work together, naturally, gave us space and didn’t make a lot of eye contact. As a director, I think it’s very important that the right atmosphere exists on a set for actors to do what they need to. In this case, what was required was a very hushed, minimal set. Not one person more than needed to be there. There’s nobody on set that’s going to be distracting in any way.”

“Directors need to be a lot of things—incredibly open, malleable, strong, specific,” says Hoffman. “But also they need to be a protector. They need to be somebody who’s there between you and whatever else, so you can do what you need to.

“It’s very important for a director to not be a wise-cracking, smartass cynic. I like hanging out with people like that, but as a director, no. I look for a lot of love for acting, and a lot of love for great story and character. And you can see that—the joy that’s in that. [But when] you come to a director who’s not like that and who’s always trying, it’s awful. You wonder if they really care. Who wants to go tell private things about yourself in front of somebody who might not f——ing care? Or who does care but doesn’t have maturity enough to let himself be needy or be vulnerable. Directors need to be very, very human.”

Earnest, passionate, human, with a deep love for acting, character and story—sounds a lot like Hoffman. Perhaps he’d care to direct. “It’s not one of those things I would just do on a lark,” he responds. “I would have to have something inside that said I’m the one that needs to do that story. And I would want to know every aspect of making that film. I would want to know how to shoot it; I would want to be making those decisions, collaborating in a way where I felt like I had some kind of knowledge and intelligence about how to tell a story with cameras and lights.”

Hoffman learned more about these aspects of filmmaking on Capote, where he served as producer. But he’s always been interested in how the pieces fit together beyond his role. Otherwise, he says, “you’re acting in a selfish manner where it’s just about me trying to be great in a role. You won’t be an actor very long, or you won’t be a really good one very long. You have to have something driving you that’s thematic because that’s going to be the thing that’s gonna push you through to the other side. You’ve got to be thinking, ‘What’s this about? What’s this saying? What am I part of?’ And when you really have that strong in you, it impassions you. That’s what Capote did. I had a lot of hard days on that film. But it kept me going because I knew that there was something special about this picture. It was beyond me just playing this part well. I knew I needed to play it well for the film to work, but ultimately the tale is going to be the most potent thing. The tale and all the things that the story is doing.”

WHILE FILMING ALMOST FAMOUS, during Hoffman’s first monologue as Lester Bangs, Crowe cranks the music to convey the scene’s energy, as he’s continually done to prepare his actors since Jerry Maguire. Hoffman immediately stops the take. “What are you doing?” he asks. It was the last time the director would use the technique on him. Hoffman laughs at the memory, but says he understands what Crowe was going for and that he’s one of those passionate, un-cynical directors he loves. “But turn it off, because I’ve got something going myself.”

The incident recalls one of Hoffman’s pet peeves from working with certain directors. “Some people, right before action, they’ll be like [he leans in and whispers in imitation]—‘You’re tired, you’re sad, your wife just died, you’re bleeding from your ass… Go!’” Hoffman recoils, throwing his hands up. “I’m like, ‘No. Stop, stop.’ It immediately draws me out of any focus I had and I’m just me in a room with a camera, wanting to laugh. The same thing with the music. It just takes me someplace that’s how I would react to this music. When you’re playing a character, you’re playing aspects of yourself pertaining to another person. It’s you and you’re personalizing. But you’ve already done this kind of work on it, so you know what’s propelling you into the scene.”

He may be drawing on his own characteristics, but Hoffman so consistently imbues his characters with their own identity that his own seems lost. As we talk, I search for signs of recognition, something from one his characters that’s really just part of Philip Seymour Hoffman, but there’s nothing. Certainly, he bears little resemblance to Capote, the actor’s natural weight restored (he reportedly lost over 40 pounds for the role) along with his beard, flyaway hair, slapdash dress and bushy eyebrows snaking over his glasses. It’s also hard to see the cocksure Freddie Miles (The Talented Mr. Ripley), the timid but ever-caring Phil Parma (Magnolia), the officious enthusiast Brandt (The Big Lebowski), the awkward Scotty J. (Boogie Nights) or—thankfully—the creepy loner Allen (Happiness). All I can glean is a strange combination of Lester Bangs and Inside the Actors Studio host James Lipton—like them, he’s passionate about his art, his craft, his industry, but he speaks (minus the Lipton hyperbole) in the restrained tones of an academic. Bangs’ passionate rants and punctuated gesturing and pacing are replaced by subdued reflection, Hoffman’s hand on his chin or covering his mouth as he alternately leans in or kicks back, relaxing.

Hoffman is accustomed to the searching stare, the one that says, “I know you from somewhere.” It began with Scent of a Woman and got worse with Twister, Boogie Nights and Happiness. But it took him several years to figure out why people were staring. “I started to freak out,” he says, showing his New York colors. “You have no reference at all. If someone stares at you in life, it’s for a reason. Either it’s because they know you, or they’re daydreaming and they don’t know they’re staring at you, or they have a f——ing problem with you. It’s one of those three things; it can’t be the fourth one. It can’t be because they recognize you from somewhere, or else you’d know them. I would almost want to say, ‘What the f—— are you staring at? You got a f——ing problem?’” He laughs. “How embarrassing. I’m so glad I didn’t.”

The celebrity lifestyle isn’t something Hoffman has ever really sought. He loves talking about his work—he says he’d be a teacher if he couldn’t act—but he’s guarded about his private life. “Someone said, ‘I’ve heard you hate the press,’ but I don’t feel that way at all,” he explains. “I enjoy myself actually. There’s a certain level of us, here, talking about the process of what we do and maybe it will be of interest to somebody. It would’ve been of interest to me when I was 20 years old. That’s what I was soaking up—these ideas, these theories, these ways of looking at things that excite people. And that’s cool. It’s art, people talking about art. But there’s a whole other side that is not that. Sometimes it’s cloaked as that, and then the cloak is ripped away and you see its [true] intent. So if you don’t have to be around it, you’re not. And it’s not gonna be something that I’ll lose sleep over or feel bad about.”

Of course, promoting a picture demands a certain acquiescence to being a public figure. “I’m definitely not the most uncompromised person in the world,” he adds. “I’m not avoiding it very much at all right now. And I’m not all that comfortable with it. I do try to hold onto the fact that I love the movie and I do feel strong about the film. So I’m not bothered by talking about it or pitching it or going on the Today Show like I did today or doing whatever needs to be done.”

As for the Oscars, Hoffman says he’s trying not to think about it. It’s hard to get your head around the whole thing—or, at least, winning. “Not winning is what every actor knows, and it’s comfortable,” he says. “Not winning those things—I could deal with that. Winning would be the thing. What would that be? I don’t know what that would be. I don’t know if it would change anything. I don’t know what it would do. It’s something you have to find out.” Hoffman pauses before adding, “If called, I don’t want to make too big an ass out of myself.”

As our interview draws to a close, I ask Hoffman what advice he’d give an actor trying to play Philip Seymour Hoffman. He sits back and ponders this a while, then finally—belying an hour of discussion on the travails of acting—he answers: “I don’t work nearly as hard as you might think.”


Articles

Categories:






Paste Magazine issue 48 (Of Montreal)
advertisement
 

Contests.






 


 
 


Non-U.S. Addresses | Privacy

Give the Gift
of Music


11 magazines
+ 11 CDs
+ the priceless joy of finally having someone to debate good music with

Give Now >

Paste offers a variety of subscription services online to best serve you.

Order Paste
  Subscribe
  Gift Subscriptions
  International Subscriptions
  Back Issues

Your Subscription
  Account Maintanence
  Address Change
  CD Sampler Sleeves
  Contact Us
  FAQs
  Pay Bill
  Renew Subscription
  Where to Buy

Paste Magazine Culture Club.

Podcast Feature.

Episode 70
August 19, 2008

We're bringing you some of the artists we think are the best of what's next. Featuring selections from Slow Runner, Janelle Monae, The Spring Standards and more!
// More Info
// Download

Subscribe in iTunes.