6.8
Books  |  Reviews

Swann Dives In by Charles Salzberg

A man of literature uncovers a crime ...

February 19, 2013  |  3:48pm
<i>Swann Dives In</i> by Charles Salzberg

British writer Stuart Evers addressed the question of mystery fiction as literature, observing that, “...at its best, crime writing offers unique insights into society, psychology, and human behavior. It can be both engaging and literate; compelling and well-written. It can be innovative and surprising, but what it can’t be, it seems, is feted in the same way as literary fiction. The most crime writers can hope for is to be told, as Ian Rankin indeed was, that their novels ‘almost transcend the genre.’ Faint praise indeed.”

Swann Dives In, Charles Salzberg’s second fiction of a series, gives the subject a new wrinkle. This book’s characters integrally involve themselves in branches of literature. One, like the author himself, makes a living as a lit professor. A second, the villain, churns out a fortune in high-value first- and second-edition books. The entire tale swarms with collectors, traders, a librarian, a seller, auctioneers, etc. You don’t find much (on these pages, that is) not book-related. So the Proustian reference in the name of Salzberg’s hero is no accident.

The central character in the tale would have you think he’s just a casual book reader like most of us. Academically, he’s a drop-out from Columbia who works as a skip tracer for a bail bondsman in Syracuse. If you think the occupation requires less skill at tracking down a fugitive than the skills of a Michael Connelly gumshoe, you haven’t discovered Henry Swann.

As in almost every noirish mystery with a male sleuth at center stage, we find a broad … but here she’s not the client. Instead her father, rich alpha-male Carlton Philips, comes to Swann. The counsel, like any self-made millionaire with pride and arrogance to burn, expects miracles. He wants Henry to find his estranged daughter Marcy in a day or two. She’s living with a scoundrel of low morals, one Sean Loomis. Philips’ dear runaway hasn’t returned phone calls in all the months since she disappeared from her apartment with her miscreant lover boy. Philips isn’t so much wounded as deeply worried … or so he would have his skip tracer believe.

Swann doesn’t much care for the man’s overlord demeanor. He also senses that there’s more to the case than Philips lets on—a suspicion that will thicken with the plot, starting when he learns that Marcy isn’t even the daughter’s real name. Still, a sleuth doesn’t have to like, or even trust, an employer if the guy pays in big figures and can keep from becoming a pest… or his own worst enemy.

Operating under the belief that finding Loomis will lead to the girl, our self-deprecating, methodical hero treads the same avenues a brilliant rogue might take on a path to the rare book trade (where BTW, his client lawyer is a big-timer). Swann interviews people who have known Loomis from the time he was an errant but special student, and a picture emerges of a very accomplished scoundrel: astute, IQ near the intellectual heavens, a lawyer, a criminal mastermind. This image firms with each professor, librarian, collector, book trade professional and con artist willing to tell what he or she knows.

With books and literature discussed almost every page, you might take Swann to be a dour academic. While he can appreciate the value of a rare first-edition of a classic, Swann proves human: down-to-earth, personally flawed, an ex-alcoholic with a broken marriage. He gives himself to philosophizing over the ironies of life, his sardonic wit ever on display. In a hotel bar meeting, Professor Richard Dubin, who knew rascally Sean as a lit major some years before, observes to Swann, “Frankly, if you ask me, you look a little lost.” Swann knows better than to deny it, saying, “Like Daniel Boone once said, ‘I can’t say I was ever lost, but I was bewildered once for three days.’”

Swann’s a guy you wouldn’t mind having a beer with. A guy you can become very concerned about when he steps into the zone of violent, desperate men and personal danger.

Sharing a beer might also apply to the author (full disclosure: he sent me a signed copy, so you could say he knows how to get a review). As a professor of literature himself, Salzberg started his Swann series one book ago with Swann’s Last Song, sticking to familiar turf as he ventured into fiction for the first time. If I offer any criticism, it’s this: book-related developments crowd out all other aspects of life and drama, making for a peculiarly insular … if not microscopically narrow … read. We find no lack of know-how in character-creation and construction, but Salzberg brings the oft-repeated principle of “writing what you know” nearly to the point of schoolmastery. It’s palpable. He does not let up.

It leads to the question of whether the degree of immersion requires adjustment. Maybe … but maybe not. After all, one might argue, the typical legal thriller dwells on the world of attorneys and trial judges. The spy thriller puts espionage, assassins and covert ops under the lens. Still…

In the legal thriller, the attorney’s client might blend a storyline (or a subplot) into a bad marriage or on the odd career of, say, a school bus driver. The spy thriller may range widely into history or personal backstories. My point? Few books feel so completely saturated with one subject as this. It can tire, even as Salzberg shows he has the genius to tap every dramatic possibility in the world of books, including a specialized villainy that may never have occurred to us in our wildest imaginings.

Even so, Salzberg invests his tale with the charm of lively humor and elements of a good mystery. It’s no exaggeration to say he carves out his personal niche in the mystery genre. And you can add to that rich language skills and an instinct for the essentials of drama.

Yet … despite all the book-related dialogue and internal musings … Salzberg never poses the question I started out within this review, the one about the literary value of mysteries.

I can offer better examples than the Rankin quote. Rankin, in fact, lards his mysteries with so much description that the effect (on me, at least) seems a conscious effort to inspire critics to consider his work serious literature. Unfortunately, it sometimes comes at the expense of the flow and comprehension of story, and it sometimes presents an urge to skip paragraphs … or, worse, whole pages.

On the better side of the genre, James Lee Burke writes masterpieces that integrate organically inspired poetry and spirituality into Sheriff Dave Robicheaux’s battle against evil in his beloved Louisiana Bayou Teche. Like few other mystery writers, Burke penetrates the souls of his characters and of the land his hero protects.

In my world of reviewing mysteries, the most creative and original writers of the genre leave no question about meeting a standard of “literature.” I’m not of the opinion that keeping a reader spellbound with suspense and richness of character in any way detracts from living up to that paradigm. Nor is mystery writing simply a commercially exploitive construction to capture its audience with high pace, violence and the conflict between good and evil. At its best it is, for me, literature with a level of excitement that derives from the depth and accuracy of human behavior under extreme circumstances of stress.

I’m forever fascinated by the possibilities of that fusion. I think that Salzberg and Stuart Evers would agree.

Jules Brenner, book and movie reviewer, has published in Mystery Scene Magazine, 9ine Magazine and Sacramento News & Reviews. Online, his book reviews appear on About.com, PopMatters and others. He’s accredited by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and is a voting member of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences (AMPAS).

comments powered by Disqus
Load More