It’s True If We Want It To Be: Did Donald Trump Poison 47 Children With Halloween Candy Last Night?
Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty
Yesterday, Slate ran an article by Franklin Foer about an alleged covert link between one of Donald Trump’s servers and a Russian bank that was based almost entirely on speculative research and hearsay. It was quickly debunked by more responsible journalists with FBI sources and competent computer people (this guy too), and the claim will likely be formally withdrawn soon—or it would, in a sane world with any accountability.
But we don’t live in a sane world with accountability. Whether that retraction comes or not, the accusations have already been tweeted out by Hillary Clinton and her media surrogates, and like the insanely irresponsible Comey email announcement from last week, the initial fallout may have more impact than the truth, whenever it pokes its head up from the rubble. Understanding that, I took particular interest in a tweet by The Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald I saw this morning, piggybacking off another tweet by MSNBC’s Chris Hayes:
Everyone: check your favorite source to see how often they’re treating extreme claims from anonymous officials as True b/c they’re pleasing. https://t.co/px8AcaPZUh
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) November 1, 2016
Greenwald and Hayes meant to warn us against jumping to conclusions, or trusting anonymous sources, or prematurely publishing inaccurate stories merely because they confirm our biases. Which is fine, I guess, if you want to be super namby-pamby about it.
But I think they’re taking the wrong lesson from this debacle. As an opportunist, what I see instead is a brave new landscape where truth is a partisan matter, and wholly dependent on one group’s desired outcome. This used to be the intellectual hallmark of the conservative movement alone, but times have changed, and liberals appear to have realized that the high ground is a lonely, forsaken place, occupied by suckers and bores. Now, facts are subjective across the spectrum. They can’t exclude me from the fun anymore—if I want something to be true, then it’s true. If I have any influence, then it might be true for a lot of other people, too. The age of wish fulfillment is here, and I’ll be damned if the rest of these bastards are going to leave me behind.
I’m not the world’s biggest Clinton fan, but I definitely want her to beat Donald Trump, and I’m willing to get my hands dirty if that’s what it takes. With that in mind, here’s a true-ish (?) story I offer you, my readers, in the hope that together, we can choose to believe it regardless of the fallout. For a veneer of credibility, I’ll be adopting the language of objective journalism, mixed liberally with the melodrama of the magazine feature. Finally, I’ll phrase the title as a question in order to give myself some distance, just in case it turns out to be total bullshit. Please enjoy.
Did Donald Trump Poison 47 Children with Halloween Candy Last Night?