Page 1 of 6
Few artistic endeavors are more collaborative than filmmaking. From marquee actors, screenwriters and cinematographers to the underappreciated grips, editors and extras, it can take a cast of hundreds or thousands to bring a story to the big screen. But an individual man or woman (or occasionally a pair of siblings) must coordinate those players, orchestrating the cinematic symphony. This month, we celebrate 50 of our greatest living directors, all of whom have redefined the art of motion pictures. Josh Jackson
50. Mel Brooks
Born: 1926, Brooklyn, N.Y.
Crowning Achievement: Blazing Saddles (1974)
The way Mel Brooks worships comedy is contagious, even when the fever is slow to catch on. Brooks’ 1968 movie, The Producers, which starred Gene Wilder in his first comedic role, was so audacious in its depiction of a frolicking Führer singing “Springtime for Hitler” that it was virtually boycotted by the public until it won an Academy Award. Brooks is a true comedic auteur: The public didn’t tell him what was funny—he told them. And he was right. He was a Jew who fought in World War II, saw firsthand the atrocities mankind wreaked on his heritage, and came out understanding that laughter is the most powerful weapon and remedy. Later, with Buck Henry, he created TV spy spoof Get Smart. Few remember how much this series did to target and annihilate the stifling fear people still harbored due to the Cold War.
Brooks’ Blazing Saddles and Young Frankenstein (both released in 1974) are two of the greatest comedies ever made. More than just simple send-ups of the Western and horror genres, they used the most unlikely settings to skewer modern racial sensitivities. Nobody knew better than Brooks the necessity of attacking subjects of common public offense. That’s why his comedies are still so therapeutic: His is a world where it’s impossible to take yourself, or anything else, too seriously. Hollis Gillespie
49. Charles Burnett
Born: 1944, Vicksburg, Miss.
Crowning Achievement: Killer of Sheep (1977)
It’s crazy that we’ve seen so few major films from Charles Burnett. The MacArthur Fellow has toiled quietly in TV for many years (he was one of several directors who worked on Martin Scorsese’s 2003 PBS series The Blues), and has abided as a definitive voice expressing the roots and lore of African-American culture. Killer of Sheep—the 16mm, black-and-white feature he wrapped in 1977 on a $10,000 budget while a graduate student at UCLA—didn’t see proper release until 2007. Then, finally, these unflinching (yet lovely) scenes from the hard-knock life of a working-class black family living in Watts, Ca.—set to a lambent soundtrack of midnight jazz and deep blues—were greeted with a rhapsodic tide of rediscovery. Critics compared Burnett to Rossellini and De Sica, Cassavetes and Robert Frank, calling him an American neo-realist visionary. His 1990 film To Sleep with Anger, starring Danny Glover as a character who can only be called “the blues walking like a man,” proved Burnett to be a magical realist, too, evoking Mississippi-crossroads myths and black snakes moaning. Burnett’s compassionate social conscience seems out of joint with 21st-century pop culture, but his profound, graceful understanding of human nature endears our hearts to the flickering screen. Steve Dollar
48. Errol Morris
Born: 1948, Long Island, N.Y.
Crowning Achievement: The Fog of War: Eleven Lessons from the Life of Robert S. McNamara (2003)
Errol Morris’ unique approach to documentary filmmaking diverges from the cinema-verité in vogue while he was in school. Instead of verité’s on-the-spot shooting, Morris shoots with the precision of Hitchcock. And instead of attempting to show what’s happening as it happens, he pieces his films together retrospectively. But above all, instead of declaring that truth can be captured with a camera, Morris recognizes the limits of his form and uses them to his advantage. In his search to find a truth beyond images, Morris trashed the genre’s rulebook. Documentary cinema has never been the same. Sean Gandert
47. Jim Sheridan
Born: 1949, Dublin, Ireland
Crowning Achievement: My Left Foot: The Story of Christy Brown (1989)
Jim Sheridan has shown that honest, unflinching portrayals of families can succeed both critically and commercially. His first feature, 1989’s My Left Foot: The Story of Christy Brown, garnered five Oscar nominations—including Best Picture and Best Director—and earned actor Daniel Day-Lewis his first statue. Sheridan continued to lean on his Irish roots with In the Name of the Father, The Boxer and the semi-autobiographical In America before tackling last year’s vivid Iraq War homecoming story, Brothers. The powerful, driving force behind each of his films is family. Tim Basham
46. John Sayles
Born: 1950, Schenectady, N.Y.
Crowning Achievement: Lone Star (1996)
John Sayles epitomizes the idea of an independent filmmaker: a writer/director of singular vision, making intimate movies on shoestring budgets financed outside of the studio system. But he’s also used that very system to his great advantage. He’s financed many of the 16 films he’s written and directed by working for others—cranking out B-movie scripts for Roger Corman, directing Bruce Springsteen videos like “Born in the USA,” rewriting blockbusters like Apollo 13 and The Fugitive, even taking a commission from Steven Spielberg to write Jurassic Park IV. But his brilliance lies in his examinations of personal relationships and his astute, nuanced observations of everyday politics. He also elicits fantastic performances from casts that include David Strathairn, Chris Cooper, Mary McDonnell, Kris Kristofferson, Angela Bassett and many other greats. Highlights include Return of the Secaucus 7, Passion Fish, and The Secret of Roan Inish. Tim Regan-Porter
45. Sofia Coppola
Born: 1971, New York
Crowning Achievement: Lost in Translation (2003)
With just three full-length movies in 10 years, Sofia Coppola has not only squelched any accusation of nepotism (she’s the daughter of Francis Ford and the cousin to all of Hollywood), she’s established a small, beautiful oeuvre. Each film varies just enough in setting and subject: The Virgin Suicides captures the breathlessness of adolescence in 1970s suburbia, while Lost in Translation and Marie Antoinette address the perils of young womanhood—namely, that of a newly married photographer in present-day Japan and the queen of France in the 1700s.
Coppola approaches her stories with enough imagination and empathy to make Bill Murray a sex symbol and the woman who said “Let them eat cake” seem sympathetic. While Marie Antoinette was as frothily ornate as one of Kirsten Dunst’s frilly dresses, Coppola is generally a restrained stylist and assured storyteller, threading her tragedies with compelling ambiguities.
Perhaps what most distinguishes Coppola is her complex conflation of soundtrack and dialogue, which allows music to express the emotions her characters cannot bring themselves to divulge—think of the neighborhood boys playing “So Far Away” over the phone to the Lisbon sisters, or of Murray and Scarlett Johansson flirtatiously disclosing their deepest desires via karaoke. Coppola re-imagines the ways pop culture can function onscreen, making her modest catalog far more compelling than many directors’ more expansive canons. Stephen M. Deusner
44. Cameron Crowe
Born: 1957, Palm Springs, Calif.
Crowning Achievement: Almost Famous (2000)
Cameron Crowe was only the second director to grace the cover of Paste. (Wes Anderson was first.) As Crowe prepared to release 2005’s Elizabethtown, we asked him to discuss each of his previous films:
Say Anything (1989, Writer/Director)
“My favorite film. It’s because of Lloyd. And I love the collaboration that happened with John Cusack, where he brought anger and resentment and pain to the character of an optimist, and in that it was something really timeless, and every time I watch it I feel like it’s lightning in a bottle and in that character.”
Singles (1992, Writer/Director/Co-producer)
“I guess I was always a little sad that the movie was on the shelf at Warner Brothers until grunge exploded and they had a reason to release it. And in some quarters, at the time, it was felt that somebody had gone out and immediately made a movie to capitalize on the grunge scene, when in fact it was a labor of love, to kind of help spotlight a lot of the local bands I really loved. And it was sort my version of Woody Allen’s Manhattan.”
Jerry Maguire (1996, Writer/Director/Co-producer)
“Jerry Maguire took a long time to write, and the gift of working that long on a script was that the cast was perfect. Everybody was perfectly cast and dying to come to work every day. I knew that when we saw the rough assembly that it worked, and I wanted to do this for life—that I wanted to be a director for life, that it was a craft that you could actually get better at and learn on the job and do.”
Almost Famous (2000, Writer/Director/Co-producer)
“Almost Famous was the movie I always had in my back pocket, that I knew, one day, if everything worked out, I’d be able to make, and it would be a love letter to rock. And I was lucky enough—because of the success of Jerry Maguire—to make it.”
Vanilla Sky (2001, Writer/Director/Co-producer)
“Vanilla Sky felt like a real kind of palate cleanser of a movie to have done. We were trying to beat an actors’ strike. We made the movie like the way people talk about having made their punk-rock albums: ‘Bash it out! Do it! The truth will come from that process.’ So I’d done that, but it didn’t feel totally like me or the version of the writing that I know I can do when I have time to kind of marinate with it and really get my heart into it all the way. I was not prepared for how polarizing it would be, but I think you can’t keep making the same movie, nor should you, and that ended up being as personal, I think, in its own way, as many of the other things that I’ve done.”
43. Terrence Malick
Born: 1943, Ottawa, Ill.
Crowning Achievement: Days of Heaven (1978)
Terrence Malick’s latest film, The Tree of Life, is currently in post-production—merely five years after his sumptuous, breathtaking The New World. That’s cause for fans to rejoice, as decades have often passed between transmissions from his secluded world. Ever since his ruminative 1973 debut Badlands, Malick has been out of step with the modern age, his gaze slowly taking in the surrounding world. The tremendous agricultural drama Days of Heaven regards animals as well as actors, while war story The Thin Red Line melds voices so as to suggest a greater underlying humanity. Andy Beta
42. Jane Campion
Born: 1954, Wellington, New Zealand
Crowning Achievement: The Piano (1993)
The anxious, sometimes ominous sexuality in Jane Campion’s films is unmistakable. Beneath her movies’ lyrical, understated surfaces—she thrives in period settings—is a fierce longing for erotic intimacy and release. It’s intense enough that her undisputed masterpiece, Piano, ultimately explodes into one of the most horrific scenes of cinema violence imaginable. Be it misunderstood psychosexual thriller In the Cut or last year’s gaspingly romantic, PG-rated drama Bright Star, Campion explores the terrains of desire, sexual possibility and mortality with an undiluted passion. Jeffrey Bloomer
41. James Cameron
Born: 1954, Kapuskasing, Canada
Crowning Achievement: Avatar (2009)
In U.S. cinema, “big-budget blockbuster” is euphemistic shorthand for “pandering to the lowest common denominator.” But while James Cameron’s personality and production costs are best described as “outsized,” few can match his visionary talent for creating whole cinematic worlds that achieve both commercial and critical success. Aliens, the first two Terminator movies, Titanic and Avatar are all modern epics in their own right—films that offer engrossing plots and affecting characters wrapped in layers of technical wizardry. Cameron’s movies are that ultimate rarity in modern filmmaking: moviegoing experiences in which suspension of disbelief doesn’t even factor. Michael Saba

Rogue Wave - Good Morning


Good list with some quibbles of course (Coppola and Eastwood lower than they should be), but no Todd Haynes, Peter Jackson or Alfonso Cuaron in top 50?
Serious missteps that should be re-evaluated.
For the Lord of the Rings trilogy alone Jackson should be there, but add Heavenly Creatures and he moves ahead of many on the list.
As for Cuaron, I don't get it. Are Y tu mama tambien, A Little Princess, the best Potter film by far and the masterful Children of Men not enough for inclusion? That trumps any PC attempts.
I am sure Todd Field is on the cusp, even with only a couple of entries. I would hope Marc Foster is also right out of the top 50 and Michel Gondry.
No Ramin Bahrani? He's arguably one of the best recent directors with "Man Push Cart", "Chop Shop", and "Goodbye Solo".
Great List! Still, what about Oliver Stone! Although his movies in the late 90s’ and 00’s were less ambitious, he ruled in the late 80s’ and 90s’. Stone is an important filmmaker, uniquely innovative, and dares to place the “American Dream” under a microscope. Moreover, in the 80s’ he was one of the few directors able to care on the inspiration/torch of the “New Hollywood” movement of the early 70s’ (i.e. Scorsese, Altman, Coppola, Ashby, Bagdanovich).
Good list buuuuuuuuuut...
I can understand your exclusions of the few in the posts mentioned before mine (surely, they were hovering just outside of 50) but I really, really, REALLY can't understand how you have Scorsese at #1 (Deservedly) and not have his UK equivalent, Shane Meadows (Somers Town, This Is England etc) on the list at all.
Explain!
Agreed with one of the other posters. I'm most shocked not to see Todd Haynes on this list. Sorry, but that's just a joke.
Alfonso Cuaron and Peter Jackson are more famous than Haynes, but he is definitely an auteur. Those two have made some very special contributions to cinema, though. More so than others who made this list.
Orson Welles? no? Did I miss him in the list? I know his body of work isn't that big...{that was lie of course}
Hey Dredge, Welles would have surely made our list if he was still living.
If only I had read the title as attentively as I did the list, I wouldn't have written that. Sorry...
How can you leave Peter Jackson off this list? huge failure!
Uhhh...where is Sidney Lumet?!
How about Alexander Payne? Election is easily as good as Rushmore if not better.
lost a lot of repect for you on this list paste.
After making a series of pretentious tweets about this topic I feel guilty and am going to only (mostly) say nice things here.
It's a good list (I guess...whatever that even means). I'm no movie scientist, but I applaud your recognition of Von Trier's Breaking the Waves over any of his other bizarre, mysogenistic hate fantasies.
Also Chris Nolan (sure), but giving The Dark Knight its recognition without fear of losing your "signs of life in movies something something" reputation was a solid move. The Dark Knight is some of the best, most fun cinema of the decade.
Of course Magnolia...
And yes Woody allen, Francis Coppola, and Jean-Luc Godard certainly are all greats, despite only making garbage in recent memory (with some Woody Allen exceptions).
And thank you for leaving off Peter Jackson, because I dislike the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy.
It's not my perfect 50 great moviemakers list, but then again it's a list and I have no idea what my own would even look like nor do I know how to measure such things. There's no mathematics of art....or maybe there is... Ask Von Trier.
Challah!
sam mendes???
To each his own obviously. But exactly what garbage has Coppola or Godard made of late? I'd love to know.
I feel as if Spike Jonze should have made this list, however that is more personal preference than my one other complaint (it is a great list).
Where the hell is Roman Polanski?
When mentioning the obvious missteps of Jackson and Cuaron (which bother me even more after 24 hours), I missed the insanity of leaving off Lumet and Polanski.
If Coppola is on for Godfather alone, where is Polanski for Chinatown and Rosemary's Baby? 2 absolute classics and the quintessential horror and Noir films by a living director.
Lumet gave us Before the Devil in 07 as an 80+ year old. So many old people on your list are no longer relevant. Sure, he has made some tripe, but he has given us 12 Angry Men, Dog Day Afternoon!, Serpico, Verdict, Fail-Safe and Network. Really, not top 50?
REDUX DEMANDED, at least a Mea Culpa.
You've got to be kidding, any rag that would list hacks like Tarantino and James Cameron in a top 50 directors list and then forget Giuseppe Tornatore has forfeited the right to be taking seriously. Tornatore gave audiences "Cinema Paradiso," "Malena", "Star Maker" and "Legend of 1900". All are feasts for the eyes and have great stories. Niether Cameron or Tarantino could write a screenplay they didn't crib at least 2 dozen bits, dialogue and shots. Tornatore creates art these other two guys give us grindhouse flicks and CGI driven pabulum with paper thin characters.
Great list, though I would have included Spike Jonze.
OK I'm confused. No Sergio Leone? That's a clumsy omission. But worse, and it renders this list meaningless, no Stanley Kubrick. Is he really not there? I'm I blind?
I can understand Shane Meadows not being on this list. He's probably misunderstood by the compilers I can imagine, also his profile is not as high as it really ought to be. He'll be on these lists one day there's no doubt about that.
Oh hold on Kubrick ain't on it so maybe not.
For shame sir! For shame!
Ah. I see it now. Living directors. Darn.
I lobbied long and hard for the inclusion of zombie Sergio Leone, to no avail ...
Brad Bird. Only three movies so far, but all three are classics.
What about that Woo dude??
Jess
www.total-anonymity.us.tc
I was just reading all of the comments to make sure it wasn't said so that I could post exactly what you did. :)
In matter of opinion, this list is missing some players.
Tarsem for "The Fall"
Darren Arinofsky "The Fountain"
Where are these guys? No indie love?
I agree somewhat. I would have put Rob Reiner on there before Mel Brooks seeing as how he hasn't made a good movie since he stopped working with Gene Wilder and Reiner only fell off around the time of "North" ("The American President" notwithstanding). But, Gary Marshall? Um, no. I am wondering where Kathryn Bigelow is, seems like she would be a better fit than Sofia Coppola.
Perhaps you dismissed him more as a playwright [Glengarry Glen Ross, Speed the Plow] or a TV guy [The Unit], but I challenge all of you to sit down and watch House of Games, Things Change, The Winslow Boy, and Redbelt and tell me David Mamet is not one of the 50 greatest living directors. [Either that, or he died recently and I don't know it.]
The list has some glaring omissions, particularly from earlier European filmmakers who are still alive and active.
Bernardo Bertolucci is a supreme master of Italian cinema, the inheritor of the Visconti mantle. The Conformist is one of the finest films of the second half of the 20th Century. Bertolucci's contribution with Last Tango in Paris, 1900, The Last Emperor, and The Sheltering Sky places him head and shoulders above two-thirds of the other directors on your list.
But even more amazing is the exclusion of one of the French cinema's masters of the past 50 years, Claude Chabrol. I expected him to be placed in your top five, not completely off the list! An amazing filmography, focused on outstanding performances by women--Stephane Audran and Isabelle Huppert primarily. Such amazing films:
Les Biches, Le Femme Infidele, This Man Must Die, Le Boucher, La Rupture, Violette, The Story of Women, La Ceremonie.
Without Chabrol, your list is not just incomplete--it is unenlightened. Who screwed up and forgot this master of cinema, the only real successor to Hitchcock?
I think I may declare this list invalid for the snub of Park Chan-wook. When you have Steven Spielberg (your #3) in the process of doing an American remake of one of your films (Oldboy), you deserve to be on this list.
"For over half a century, the mysterious Marker—who’s never been photographed"
A simple google image search would have prevented this ridiculous gaffe.
Also, reading these comments is hilarious, even more funny than some of the inclusions/exclusions to the actual list.
Todd Field?
Peter Jackson?
Sam Mendes?
Rob fucking Reiner?
Get real people. Time to watch some more films.
And Scorsese at number 1 is a joke in itself. I bet he laughed when you told him you had him at the top.
4 total women on this list (1 American); 99% of the comments from men, and no one -- not Paste editors, few to zero readers -- comments on this. Yes, many on the list are good or great directors, but what does it mean to be part of an industry that effectively excludes women? Basically, if you're not part of the solution -- in your work, art,and personal lives, however you choose to do that-- you're part of the problem, and, if you have women in your lives -- filmmakers, writers, artists, daughters who might want to be directors someday -- you should care. Otherwise, this discussion is just a big film school circle jerk.
although I have my quible shared 2 times already, I would like to let you know I am almost forgiving you for leaving of Sam Mendes, the most self important director of hateful, pedantic shite this side of Paul Haggis.
Roman Polanski and Sydney Lumet are still alive.
I'm not here to complain about your list. What surprised me (besides the numerous typoes in issue 61) is that your review of Woody Allen (number 7) is the shortest of the 50! Not only that, but it comes off as almost a diss, dismissing him with all the usual complaints of someone who hasn't seen (or at least, truly seen) any of his films! Couldn't you find one person who could give Woody the credit he deserves?
No Roman Polanski = irrelevant list
I HATED this list...not one mention of Ang Lee or Zhang YiMou by either commentors or the original writers.
Zhang YiMou
Ang Lee
Roman Polanski
Spike Jonze
And, just for obscurities sake - Bela Tar!
John Hughes...even though he's recently deceased, he should still get mentioned...and George Lucas? Jean Pierre-Jeunet? Peter Jackson? Clint Eastwood?
Christopher Guest? Michael Moore?
I know he's mainstream, but I'm a little surprised that Ron Howard isn't on here too...I mean, James Cameron is? And Sofia Coppola??? Really? Her movies are about as good as her acting.
I'm thrilled that Steven Spielberg was placed so high when there are so many idiot hipsters who blindly hate him just because it's chic. Close Encounters is one of the most enthralling and beautiful art film/mass-appeal hybrids ever made.
I just wish the list also included Bertolucci and Polanksi. Polanksi did direct the best horror film (Rosemary's Baby) and the best noir (Chinatown) of modern times, you know.
"Talk to Her" is good movie movie but it's a far cry from being Pedro Almodovar's "crowning achievement." "All About My Mother" and "Volver" are much better choices, but I believe the distinction goes to his 1988 breakout screwball comedy "Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown."
And since we're talking Spain, what about Carlos Saura and Jose Luis Garci?
I won't comment on any of the choices (well maybe Tarantino, who's an overrated hack, and to whom is given far too much credit for his "exploration of violence" -- he doesn't explore it; he just LIKES it), and I haven't read all the comments so I may have missed someone else's mention of him, but how could you omit Zhang Yimou? You've got Raise the Red Lantern, To Live, The Road Home, Hero, House of Flying Daggers, Riding Alone...etc. He's not on the list but Tarantino and Cameron (Cameron!!???) are?
I am glad, however, that Lynch made it into the top ten.
Where the F&*K is Oliver Stone? You morons. I was going to forward this list to friends, but now I'm just going to be sick.
The inclusion of Terry Gilliam made me smile.
Someone else pointed out the omission of Polanski and Lumet--their absence was surprising to me too. I wonder if Polanski's not on the list because of the sex scandal, which has been making headlines again. Lumet's absence is absolutely dumbfounding to me. I would personally take Lumet over Scorsese, and even from an objective standpoint, Lumet's achievements earn him a spot on here.
oh, and his family name is Hou, not Hsiao-hsien. In China and Taiwan, the family name comes first. Points for having him on the list though.
Where's Jonathan Demme? Besides such films as Silence of the Lambs and Married to the Mob and Philadelphia he has directed many music films and concerts including arguably the best concert film ever - Stop Making Sense. Is it possibly some of you may not know who he is? He would have been in the top 10 ten years ago.
Also picking Grizzly Man as the crowning achievement for Werner Herzog is a minority opinion; Most would say Aguirre the Wrath of God. However, you put Breathless for Jean luc Godard [his first film] which is a slap in the face to a filmmaker who has made many better films such as Contempt, Weekend and Histoire(s) du cinéma. And you mention the names Alain Resnais and Chris Marker as part of the nouvelle vague which is incorrect. The nouvelle vague was Chabrol, Godard, Rivette, Rohmer and Truffaut.
How can you not have Lumet, Polanski, OR Forman on here? I can't believe none of you have said anything about the absence of Forman.
Kudos to John Sayles as being one of the best living 50 directors. Truly, one of the last independent film auteurs. For future consideration each of these directors should be given a second look: Sidney Lumet (DOG DAY AFTERNOON, THE VERDICT, 12 ANGRY MEN), Milos Forman (CUCKOO'S NEST, AMADEUS), George Lucas (Not only created the STAR WARS franchise, and AMERICAN GRAFETTI but changed the way we see and listen to movies), David Mamet (one of the top five writer/directors of the last 20 years, HOMICIDE, HOUSE OF GAMES, RED BELT), Alexander Payne (SIDEWAYS is one of the great American comedies of the last decade) and Martin Brest (MIDNIGHT RUN, BEVERLY HILLS COP). MIDNIGHT RUN has more laughs in it than any other film in its genre. De Niro is funny not because he's trying to be funny (MEET THE PARENTS), but because the film is hilarious and expertly crafted.
this list is just an embarrassment and to have some of these people on here and no mention of the following just proves how dense the American movie going public is (won't even get into some of the directors people are throwing up as examples of "GREAT" directors - Rob Reiner?, Oliver Stone?!?)...Lumet and Polanski as already mentioned are glaring absences as already mentioned
William Friedkin, Alejandro Jodorowsky, Milos Forman, Bob Rafelson, John Carpenter, Dario Argento, Paul Schrader, Tobe Hooper, George Romero, Larry Cohen, Sam Raimi, Godfrey Reggio, Arthur Penn, and Gregory Dark
What a Joke. If Godard is number two, then history matters, and how in the world is Coppola, the director of The Godfather for crying out loud, lower that Steven "I've maybe made two good movies" Soderbergh?
Here's an alternative list of the "65 Greatest Directors of the Past 40 Years, Living or Dead" sent to us by Andrew Cotton:
Alan J. Pakula- All The President's Men; Sophie's Choice
John Schlesinger- Midnight Cowboy; Marathon Man
Milos Forman- One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest; Amadeus
Oliver Stone- Platoon; Wall Street; Nixon
William Friedkin- The French Connection; The Exorcist
Sidney Lumet- Serpico; Dog Day Afternoon; The Verdict
Brian DePalma- Scarface; The Untouchables; Carlito's Way
Roman Polanski- Chinatown
Michael Mann- Heat
Mike Nichols- The Graduate; Working Girl
Jim Sheridan- My Left Foot
Cameron Crowe- Jerry Maguire; Almost Famous
Terrence Malick- The Thin Red Line
Spike Lee- Do The Right Thing; Malcolm X
Ridley Scott- Blade Runner; Gladiator
Gus Van Sant- Drugstore Cowboy
Chris Nolan- Memento; Insomnia
Terry Gilliam- Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas
Tim Burton- Ed Wood
David Cronenberg- Eastern Promises
David Fincher- Fight Club; Se7en
Francis Coppola- The Godfather; The Godfather Part II; Apocalypse Now
David Lynch- Blue Velvet; Mulholland Drive
Quentin Tarantino- Reservoir Dogs; Pulp Fiction
Woody Allen- Annie Hall; Manhattan
Paul Anderson- There Will Be Blood
Coens- Barton Fink; No Country For Old Men
Steven Spielberg- E.T.; Schindler's List
Martin Scorsese- Taxi Driver; Raging Bull; Goodfellas; Gangs of New York
Stanley Kubrick- Dr. Strangelove; 2001; A Clockwork Orange; Full Metal Jacket
Robert Altman- Nashville
Mel Brooks- Blazing Saddles
Jonathan Demme- Philadelphia; The Silence of the Lambs
Ron Howard- A Beautiful Mind; Cinderella Man
Sydney Pollack- Tootsie; Out of Africa
Peter Weir- Witness; Dead Poets Society
Robert Zemeckis- Forrest Gump
Hal Ashby- Harold and Maude; Being There
John Badham- Saturday Night Fever; Whose Life Is It Anyway?
Peter Bogdanovich- The Last Picture Show; Paper Moon
John Carpenter- Halloween
John Boorman- Deliverance
Bruce Beresford- Breaker Morant; Tender Mercies
Michael Cimino- The Deerhunter
Mike Figgis- Leaving Las Vegas
John Frankenheimer- The Manchurian Candidate
Costa-Gavras- Z
Curtis Hanson- L.A. Confidential; 8 Mile
George Roy Hill- Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid; The Sting
James Ivory- Howard's End
Norman Jewison- In The Heat of the Night; Moonstruck
Lawrence Kasdan- The Big Chill; Wyatt Earp
Barry Levinson- Diner; Rain Man; Bugsy
Adrian Lyne- Fatal Attraction
Paul Mazursky- An Unmarried Woman; Moscow on the Hudson
Alan Parker- Midnight Express
Rob Reiner- This Is Spinal Tap; Harry/Sally
Ivan Reitman- Ghostbusters
Franklin J. Schaffner- Patton
Paul Schrader- American Gigolo
Steven Soderbergh- sex, lies & videotape; Traffic
Abel Ferrara- Bad Lieutenant
Lili Fini Zanuck- Rush
Mary Harron- American Psycho
Rod Lurie- The Contender
I'm downright disgusted that James Cameron can make this list but Michel Gondry and Alfonso Cuaron can't. I'm also stunned that Spielberg is so high; he's one of the most vanilla directors in the history of film. At least Lucas isn't on there, but still. And Sofia Coppola? She's made ONE GOOD MOVIE! By that logic, Charlie Kaufman should be on here for Synechdoche, New York. But that wouldn't make sense, because he's only directed one good movie.
Eastwood is vastly overrated. People confuse the great actor with the current director, whose love of over-the-top, black-or-white emotion is so ham-fisted you can smell the pork from the screen.
Hey! Its really a different thread. I've seen actors and actress top list but the directors list is truly demanding. Good to see Steven Spielberg is the top but i was hurt to note James Cameron at 41.
Stanley Kubrick? HELLO?! I couldn't believe my eyes that he wasn't on there because I checked the list five times. Are you kidding me? I know Paste is probably smarter than this and there has to be a logical explantation for this catastrophe. Let hope it wasn't a coin toss between Tim Burton and Stanley Kubrick... You have really disappointed me this time Paste Magazine
sofia coppola over Brian De Palma???
You can't be serious. She might be in the list of the 50 most boring filmmakers of the decade (she could be at the top of that one).
most of the names who were include (or exclude)on the list are arguable. but forgetting about De Palma
shame on you!!!
have you ever seen phantom of the paradise hi mom! greetings? carlito's way, carrie, rising cain, blow up, body double, dressed to kill, etc. etc???
I guess you didn't.
I understand the exclusion of directors as, kusturica, simon staho, tornatore, polanski, and so many others since your americans...
but excluding the most important american filmmaker of the last 50 years...
well you did it
Taste of Cherry is a very interesting little picture with a real good premise that just clicks. Also, Hiroshima Mon Amour is awesome. I think I missed it in my top 100, can't remember. But Check it out.
Based on their entire career's output, not just on recent work, right?
audio codecs download