5.0
Games  |  Reviews

Gears of War: Judgment Review (Xbox 360)

March 27, 2013  |  8:00am
<em>Gears of War: Judgment</em> Review (Xbox 360)

Nothing happens for certain in Gears of War: Judgment, which is funny, because the campaign’s story operates on the premise that its main characters have testified to its events under oath in a court of law. And yet, the game changes in subtle ways with each play-through, due to the machinations of a Left 4 Dead-inspired AI director that dictates which types of Locust will best provide a challenge, moment to moment, for the heroes. Each level also begins with the option to play a “declassified” version of events, which basically makes the level harder.

But what really happens? Who knows. And more importantly: Who cares? Gears of War: Judgment doesn’t seem to.

The dialogue, the cut-scenes, and the end of the game don’t change according to which enemies spawn or which missions have been played while declassified or not. No matter what, by the end of the game, there’s the same big spider-boss and the same unlockable chapter Aftermath, a 30-minute mini-campaign set during the time-line of Gears of War 3—which mostly just reminds me how much more fun Gears of War 3 was.

Do I sound disappointed? I am disappointed. Yes, Gears of War games are stupid, but they’re fun. Judgment isn’t even fun. It’s just stupid.

I admit, I would have preferred different protagonists. If I couldn’t have Marcus and Dom, could I at least have Anya or Sam or Jace? No? Oh, well. So Judgment won’t have the romance of, say, Marcus and Dom (go with it) or any sarcastic one-liners from Sam, but at least Baird and Cole will tell me some good jokes, right?

No dice. I don’t think I cracked a smile this whole game. Did lead writers Tom Bissell and Rob Auten forget to bring the funny? You’d think a younger version of Cole would be even more endearing and hyperactive than the grown-up one, but no—this Cole seems downright shy in comparison. And Baird? Boring. I can’t believe I’m calling Baird boring.

It doesn’t help that much of the game’s dialogue takes place in voice-over. The cut-scenes flash back periodically to Baird, Cole, and their two other forgettable new squad-mates Paduk and Sofia testifying in court because they all stole a huge missile against their superiors’ orders. We all know how hilarious, charming, and not at all stilted or wooden people sound when they’re testifying in court. Who thought this was a good idea?

The stakes in Judgment are low, and they just can’t ever get that high. We already know from the outset that all of these characters are going to live, because this entire campaign takes place in a flashback (spoilers in this parenthetical: We find out that one of the two new characters dies in Aftermath, but we don’t even get to see it happen). Also, the main characters here are Cole and Baird. We know they’re going to make it, and we also know that they’re never going to learn any useful new facts about their enemies. If they had, it would’ve come up in a prior Gears game. Nothing can happen in this game that really matters, and the whole game seems all too aware of that limitation.

gears of war judgment screen 2.jpg

The writers should have tried to deliver new plot points or information about the Locust and the Lambent in some other way, even if Cole and Baird couldn’t be involved—perhaps Paduk and Sofia could have gone off on their own to discover more elsewhere. Gears of War 3 left a lot of open questions, including a big uncomfortable one about whether humans even deserve to inhabit Sera at all, considering the Locust lived there first. But Judgment ignores that question entirely, instead choosing to focus solely on the black-and-white morality of “shoot the monster! Monster bad!”

This black-and-white theme gets reinforced by the game’s nigh-constant score tallies. Every five to ten minutes, the game pauses and tells me my score for the round I just defeated. Lest I get too excited and start feeling like I’m actually inside the story, Judgment yanks my brain back to reality and reminds me that this is a section of a video game and that I just got 19 kills. Go, me. Each round also awards me stars—one to three, depending on how well I did. After you get 40 of these and unlock the Aftermath chapter, the stars feel like little more than stickers for a job well done.

It feels as though Judgment is worried about my self-esteem. Achievements, medals, ribbons, and other unlocked bonuses (e.g., for new multiplayer skins) kept filling the bottom right side of my screen, moreso than in any other previous Gears game that I recall.

Some people must enjoy this level of gamification, but I view a campaign as a chance to participate in a story—a stupid story, perhaps, but hopefully also a bad-ass story. I want the opportunity to live in someone else’s skin for a while, not the constant reminder that I’m only playing a video game. If I wanted this many score screens, I’d skip the campaign and go to the multiplayer.

Speaking of multiplayer, Judgment doesn’t offer as many modes as previous Gears games have, arriving with OverRun, Free-for-All, Domination and Team Deathmatch. I did enjoy playing as a Locust in the OverRun mode—you switch back and forth between playing as human and as Locust, and you get to pick between different character classes for different load-outs (similar to Resistance 2 and 3’s multiplayer).

Judgment will offer a few more multiplayer options as DLC later, but for the moment, there’s little of note here. If the short, unsatisfying campaign had merely been intended to go hand-in-hand with a much more comprehensive multiplayer component, I would have understood Judgment’s aim, but as it stands, I have no idea.

If you’re a Gears fan, you’ll probably buy this game anyway, but just in case you haven’t yet, be warned. This game will not feel like a Gears game. Yes, the weapons and the press-A-to-duck aspects remain, and yes, these characters have all the right names. But the atmosphere and personality of the prior games? Gone, and replaced with a slick, gamified shell of round after round.

Some might say that Cliff Bleszinski leaving Epic Games caused Gears to lose a little of its edge, or that Epic’s farming out of Judgment to the studio People Can Fly gave it a different feel, or that a better Gears of War game will come in the next Xbox console generation. All I can say is that if another Gears game comes down the pipeline, I hope it’s nothing like this. I miss my big, sweeping set-pieces and my silly one-liners. I don’t want tiny, repetitive skirmishes, boring turret sequences, and score screens every few minutes. I don’t care about my head-shot count, I care about the Locust Queen. I just want to escape to Sera for a while, and I want the stakes to be high. And while I’m dreaming, can the next Gears game star Sam Byrne, please?



Gears of War: Judgment was developed by Epic Games and People Can Fly and published by Microsoft. It is available for the Xbox 360.


Maddy Myers wrote a column about video games for the Boston Phoenix (RIP). Her work has also appeared in Kill Screen and at the Border House. She also blogs at her personal website Metroidpolitan and tweets @samusclone.

comments powered by Disqus
Related
Load More