Thoroughly Entertaining Napoleon Is a Little Short on the Man Himself

Ridley Scott’s Napoleon begins in 1793, as the future military commander, world conqueror and cuckold witnesses the execution of Marie Antoinette with muted, meditative poise. The peasants and townspeople surrounding him froth at the mouth in exuberant fury. He’s clearly taking the scene in as a means to plan his next moves, a cascade of tactics and strategies which form a path through the life of the legendary Short King (Emperor, sorry), whose name now bears the title of an entire psychological complex found in insecure, diminutive men. Scott takes us through 22 years of Napoleon’s life over the course of two-and-a-half hours (although, he’d like us to see all four hours of his intended film), throwing up titles with names and dates to assist us in understanding the sequence of events. Of course, Napoleon is less about Napoleon’s exploits than it is about the man and the myth—the temperament which made him infamous in pop culture, partly dictated by his absurd relationships with women, no more important than his former wife, Josephine.
And yet the film doesn’t spend nearly enough time rooting around in Napoleon’s mind, leaving Joaquin Phoenix—in a role which acts as a surprising companion piece to his other 2023 film about a guy with mommy issues, Beau Is Afraid—with little to do, aside from do what he does best: Occasionally erupt in rage, occasionally be funny, but mostly brood around like a little gray storm cloud. Whereas Scott’s second-most recent French period piece, The Last Duel, was a compellingly structured drama about the conflicting ways in which men and women see the same world, Napoleon falters. It is less a rich, twisty drama than a journey through a historical figure’s greatest hits, punctuated by more engrossing moments of vulnerability and intimacy that only leave you wishing there were more.
I don’t need to go over Napoleon’s rise to power and all of his exploits (I was never very good at following along with this time period during history class, anyway), which are readily available on Wikipedia, and which Scott charts with a similar tact. We hit all the biggest beats: His siege of Toulon, the 13 Vendémiaire, brushing past his conquering of Italy and moving forward into his expedition in Egypt, his coronation, and the decisive Battle of Austerlitz, which Scott fictionalizes during a snowstorm on a frozen lake in what is easily the greatest and most exciting sequence in the film.
As the Austrian and Russian armies race across the snowy tundra, they do not realize that they are, in fact, treading precariously atop a frozen lake. In a cacophony of horror and mayhem, French cannons explode across the sky, breaking the sheets of ice and sending the opposing forces plunging to their icy deaths in a halo of blood and water (shot gorgeously by frequent Scott collaborator Dariusz Wolski), all while Martin Phipps’ anachronistic score hums and pulsates like a war drum. Such liberty with historical inaccuracy makes for an exhilarating action setpiece in a film which feels otherwise restrained by its facts.