Primer‘s Sci-Fi Success Story Was an Anomaly, but Its Filmmaker’s Fall Wasn’t

A key component of Sundance Film Festival’s reputation is being the champion of low-budget independent filmmakers who exist outside of Hollywood. But does that reputation hold up to a closer examination of those who built careers from exposure there? The often referenced success stories of Richard Linklater, Darren Aronofsky, Quentin Tarantino, Paul Thomas Anderson and Steven Soderbergh should also mention how they were helming projects backed by serious producers (Robert Newmyer was working at Columbia Pictures when he produced Sex, Lies, and Videotape), and that that many of their major breakthroughs had talent that had been in the business for some time (Reservoir Dogs boasted established actors like Harvey Keitel and Steve Buscemi). In this regard, the complete lack of funding or even tangentially related Hollywood talent made Shane Carruth’s Primer—winner of Sundance’s Audience Prize in 2004, 20 years ago—an anomaly even by the festival’s standards.
Primer’s setting (a suburban home), its cast (Carruth’s friends and family) and even its filming and lighting equipment (purchased by Carruth from Walmart) all reflect the movie’s DIY essence. And its modest nature added to its impressive form. It was the ideal: A total outsider making it big.
The divisive responses appreciated its minimalist technique and scorned its near-incomprehensible, jargon-filled dialogue and looping non-linear narrative. Andrew Pulver of the Guardian commended Primer for an “unflinching naturalism” but criticized that its “narrative… is simply off-putting: in trying to be elusive, it’s simply obstructive.”
This would be an understandable pain point for filmgoers whose exposure to cinema comes from Hollywood, where exposition detailing what’s going on is crucial—if it’s not immediately known, it must be easily deduced through clues and motifs hidden within a narrative. It was damn near radical then for a sci-fi film like Primer, one that found its way to a mainstream theatrical release, to have dedicated itself to being thoroughly obtuse about its own premise. Yes, we see time travel happen. We see the characters appear in various places, sometimes at the same time. We see the non-linearity of the editing forming a complex diagram. But we don’t know what any of it means.
For some, this is the definition of pretension. For me, at least in the case of Primer, it’s a boldly successful experiment in turning something preposterous into something believable by making it as unintelligible as possible. So much popular sci-fi relies on making up concepts and explaining them in the simplest terms. The arbitrary use of words like “positrons” and “nanobots” or “plasma” are shoved in to create the illusion of scientific know-how. Carruth flips this in an ingenious way by correctly surmising that using actual jargon—while just as indiscernible on its face to most people—would automatically be given more credence through being lengthy and boring, the way an actual scientific lecture might be.