New York I Love You, But You’re Bringing Me Down: The Effect of Money and Mythology on Brooklyn DIY
The odds are disproportionately stacked against musicians and the greater Brooklyn DIY community as they face a higher cost of living and crowds hell-bent on consuming nostalgic media over anything else.
Photo by Mariano Regidor
I was there. I was there at the fourth annual LCD Soundsystem holiday residency in Queens, New York. I was also there in 2021 and, other than the residency moving from Brooklyn Steel to the Knockdown Center, what I saw was ostensibly the same. It was the same two-hour setlist, the same lightshow, activated by the same spilling bridges and the same explosive bass drops. And yet: I couldn’t care less.
I first discovered LCD Soundsystem in 2014, after hearing “New York I Love You, But You’re Bringing Me Down,” on an old episode of Gossip Girl. Like many zoomers, I spent a majority of my early adolescence scrolling on the virtual sidelines of culture, discovering everything just a little too late. By the time I heard the track and then downloaded Sound of Silver onto my iPod Nano, LCD Soundsystem had already been “retired” for three years.
Now, just 10 years later, there I was, listening to “New York I Love You, But You’re Bringing Me Down,” live. All of my flickering, pixelated memories suddenly exploded before me, transmogrifying into the real, visceral present. I understood the strangeness of this feeling, however—how paradoxical my triumph really was. While I was drunk off my own personal delight, the song I was celebrating was in fact not a victorious one, but an elegy—an elegy for the very city I now lived in. Over waltzing, wistful piano, James Murphy laments that everyone in New York is pulling minimum wage. There is a billionaire mayor who thinks he’s a king, and the doors of his treasured bars and stores are starting to shutter. Is he so wrong then, Murphy argues, to say that his New York “doesn’t exist”?
Well, maybe. According to Lizzy Goodman’s Meet Me In The Bathroom, LCD Soundsystem, along with the Strokes, the Yeah Yeah Yeahs and other 2000s “indie rock” bands, are a part of what is now canonically regarded as the last successful “New York rock dynasty.” The story goes that, after getting priced out of the East Village, these already semi-established rock bands migrated to Williamsburg, Brooklyn—taking full advantage of the low rent to host all-ages DIY rock shows like those found at 285 Kent, Death by Audio, Silent Barn and Shea Stadium.
After 9/11, the tenor of this era of Brooklyn became one of “partying like the world’s going to end.” With purposefully smudged eyeliner and fear behind their eyes, Brooklyn residents saw a need—as well as open retail space—to release and rejoice. Whether you listened to electroclash bands like Peaches and Fischerspooner, indie rock acts like the Strokes, or you just liked attending Misshapes’ celebrity-filled parties, Brooklyn was indoctrinated by a galvanizing mutual hedonism. But just as quickly as this “artist bohemia” flourished, it vanished. Or, more accurately, it was gutted.
While gentrification is compounded by a number of factors—wealth of the renters, as well as the interest of various stakeholders (investors, developers, public policy officials)—the proliferation of artist scenes that emerge (uncoincidentally within previously segregated racial and class neighborhoods) directly influence the symbolic, or imagined, identity of a place. Once word spread that Williamsburg was a hip, up-and-coming, blue-collar utopia, the DIY spaces—the apartments, offices and restaurants—in which cultural products (like art) were made were then bought and sold for double or triple the price of their original value. So while you can no longer go to 285 Kent, you can shop at Chanel and Hermès.
After a certain point, however, the Meet Me in the Bathroom bands no longer really needed the physical Williamsburg—they already benefited off its symbolic identity and created a legacy—a legacy that was then even furthered only a few years after the era “ended,” through the success of Meet Me In The Bathroom. Almost immediately after the book’s release LCD Soundsystem returned with their fourth studio album, American Dream. The LP then became their first #1 album in the United States, earning them a Grammy nomination for Best Alternative Music Album and a win for Best Dance Recording (“Tonite”).
While I enjoy that record, I don’t necessarily think it’s their best. By virtue of their preemptive mythologizing, however, it became impossible to not see LCD Soundsystem through a nostalgic lens, thus appreciating their cultural value, i.e. their perceived seminality. So when the dance rock messiah returns, you must praise him (with a Grammy). Like LCD, we’re currently witnessing a surge of nostalgia-fueled touring, particularly by cultish alternative bands whose glory days might be well behind them even if they weren’t that long ago. Modest Mouse did the entirety of The Lonesome Crowded West; Built to Spill toured There Is Nothing Wrong With Love; Weezer did the Blue Album in full last summer. While there isn’t anything inherently wrong with this, it’s just too easy. It’s selling you something you already bought. Even Taylor Swift knows this, as her “Eras Tour” became the highest grossing tour ever, pulling in more than $2 billion, even though her golden years are far, far from over.
The aesthetic proliferation of LCD Soundsystem’s bygone era, known under the neologistic “indie sleaze revival,” is a similarly nostalgia-based act of consumption. It’s a search-engine optimizer—go to Amazon and type “indie sleaze” and you’ll see what I mean—so while those dressed in bedazzled tees and microskirts can post TikToks or make songs that sound like a Drake-ified, fuckboy version of LCD Soundsystem there is no real subculture attached to their visual identity. When reliant purely on aesthetics and market value, art, even if it poses as radical or subversive, amounts to nothing more than a hologram of an ideology. It simply becomes commerce.
Even more troubling: Our culture’s obsession with nostalgia, prevalent not just within the music industry but practically every artistic medium, indicates an underlying displeasure with the present. Or, as S. Posner so perfectly puts it in this Substack post, it indicates an “indie malaise.” Industries also see this nostalgic preoccupation, so they capitalize on the “good times,” those of ease and seeming rebellion, in order to distract you from the bad. It’s effective marketing, because when living through both political and economic turmoil, distraction is one of the easiest, most immediate coping mechanisms. It’s like eating because you’re bored—you’re not sure what to do with yourself, so you consume until your own satisfaction, no matter how momentary, says you’re content.
Art, if anything, is supposed to surprise us. This means engaging in something unexpected and unfamiliar, something new. New bands, good bands, crop up every single day—especially in New York City. DIY didn’t stop once Williamsburg became a hipsterish Times Square, because, as one cultural moment dies and a phenomena fades, invariably, something new must grow from its ashes. Maybe even a few things. Consider the two Brooklyn acts tapped to open for LCD Soundsystem: the art-punk band Gustaf and the electronic trio Fcukers. Not only are these the two sides of the same LCD coin (one dance, one post-punk), these, to me, similarly exemplify the two current sides of Brooklyn music—which is to say the two sides of Brooklyn nightlife.