Kansas Actually Has a Chance to Get Its Shit Together in Today’s Special Election
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty
What’s the matter with Kansas?
Politically, everything. The problems illustrated by Thomas Frank in one of the best political books ever have only gotten worse in the decade and change since its publication. Sam Brownback, looming figurehead of the corporate-backed “populist” movement known as the Tea Party, became governor of Kansas in 2011, and brought with him a comprehensive mandate in one of the nation’s reddest states. He could do whatever the hell he wanted, and that’s exactly what he did, and Kansas became a living experiment in what happens when “small government” ideologues like Brownback have total control.
In short, he decimated the state. I highly recommend you spend some time reading the various excellent articles about how he led his state to total economic ruin, but here’s the situation short:
—With tax cuts for the wealthy, Brownback managed to deprive the state of $680 million in income tax revenue by 2016, and $570 million in total tax revenue, compared to three years earlier. This was caused in large part by massive cuts, and in some cases wholesale repeals, of taxes on LLCs.
—Amazingly, after screwing things up so badly, state Republicans approved the largest tax hike in state history in 2015, which didn’t begin to cover the budget shortfall.
—At the end of the fiscal year 2016, the budget was so screwed up that the state government had to withhold $260 million from public schools in order to balance it, which was only the latest gigantic cut schools suffered under Brownback’s tenure. By 2015, he had also gutted highway spending and money allotted for Medicaid coverage.
—Meanwhile, the economy sputtered and stalled, contrary to the idea that the huge tax cuts would somehow magically make it grown, Reaganomics-style.
—In the midst of the huge cuts to schools and other public institutions, Brownback pushed through a bill that punished the State Supreme Court (by abolishing its powers to appoint chief judges) in a clear act of retribution for the court’s decision to actually hold him accountable for denying equitable funding to public schools, particularly those in low-income areas.