Jessie Buckley and Rory Kinnear Interview: Confronting Their Inner Demons in Men

Whenever writer/director Alex Garland points his pen, or lens, at a subject, the only certainty is that by the end of the journey, he’s going to expose the audience to things they’ve never seen before. Usually, he likes to use science fiction (Annihilation) and technology (Devs) to dig into our human frailties and flaws. But in his latest, Men, Garland’s taking a sojourn into folk-horror territory to look at grief, guilt and toxic masculinity.
A contemporary tale set in England, Men sees Jessie Buckley play Harper, a self-sufficient career woman who has been recently widowed. The circumstances of her husband James’ (Paapa Essiedu) death factors deeply into the story and prompts her to travel from London to the Cotswolds for an isolated two-week retreat in a rented manor. Attempting to work through her complicated feelings in some solitude, she’s instead constantly made to interact with the men of the small village, all of whom are played by Rory Kinnear.
A series of fascinating interactions document with startling accuracy the everyday microaggressions women navigate from the opposite sex, which start as just nosey and slightly invasive and escalate to terrifying and violent. And then in the third act, Garland’s promise to floor your eyeballs is realized in one of the most surreal sequences he’s ever captured on film. Audiences will have a field day parsing the symbolism and subtext out of one of the strangest body horror moments in recent memory. And that got us at Paste wondering what Buckley and Kinnear thought about Garland’s script and then seeing it all come together on-screen. We got on a Zoom interview with Jessie Buckley and Rory Kinnear to get their thoughts on Men.
Paste Magazine: Jessie, did the script initially speak to you because of how it potently portrays the implied threats women have to navigate day-to-day?
Jessie Buckley: It was more about our relation to each other as men and women. It wasn’t something that I was divided about. It provoked questions in me about what is going on? Why is there a breaking apart between each other, in some way? And how can we actually move forward together? Sometimes you have to go and face the monster within ourselves, and each other, to understand. It was more of that than a kind of straight feminism.
Rory, you wrote bios for each of the men you play. How did that help you shape your performances?
Rory Kinnear: I knew that I was lucky to be attached to something so early on in the process. And I knew that with costume and hair and makeup that they would be keen to begin their process as well. I guess I just wanted to make sure that we were all going down a similar kind of path.
And their biographies were not like, “I think they look like this,” or “That they wear this.” They gave an impression of who these people were: Their lives, where they’d come from, the kind of schooling they’d had, what their parents had done, what music they were into and that kind of thing. Quite a few of the descriptions of the characters were pretty minimal. A few of them don’t speak at all, so I wanted to make sure that even those characters were fully rounded. Because otherwise, you get a sense if an actor hasn’t invested in one particular character because it slightly jumps out, the hollowness. I needed to make sure that I had done a similar level of work with each one of them. And then, yeah, it was more a question of trial and error, and playing around with costumes and hair and makeup. Then the first day that you [played] a character, things could change that morning if you’d have an idea. It was really good fun, obviously. But I also made sure that I was taking each one as seriously as the other.
Was Garland surprised by any of your interpretations?
Kinnear: No. It was more like, it became quite instructive how people respond to the surface every time I’d go on set, depending on who I was playing. I wasn’t staying in character in between takes. I was still Rory. But people responded to me in completely different ways depending on what my external appearance was. That was quite instructive. And also the odd things of how different a pair of contact lenses can make your whole personality seem. So yeah, that was quite fun to play with as well.
Garland said a lot of what’s in the film came out of the rehearsal process. I can imagine that a lot of the conversations were based on experiential things that helped add extra layers to the men Harper meets, or how they speak to each other.