Essay: Ethan Young on the Duty of Documenting One of China’s Darkest Episodes in Nanjing: The Burning City
Chronicling one of the most devastating episodes in 20th Century history, Ethan Young’s Nanjing: The Burning City is a sucker punch of emotion and fury. The graphic novel dissects the Nanjing Massacre, the 1937 atrocity in which the Japanese army tortured, raped and murdered a city abandoned by the military, claiming over 300,000 lives. Young (Tails: Life in Progress, A Piggy’s Tale) takes the sheer size and import of the event and distills it through the lives of soldier Lu and his Captain as they seek escape after the Japanese take their city.
Though Young renders the book in a stark monochrome that recalls the line work of Joe Kubert, Nanjing: The Burning City sifts through spectrums of tumultuous gray. Lu and the Captain trek through a battlefield of disenfranchised victims, blind survivors and philosophizing warriors. More disturbing, the pair also confronts the dawning realization that its fighting for a country that left its city in the most vulnerable of states.
With this seminal work debuting tomorrow in comic stores and September 1 in book stores, Paste is proud to present an exclusive essay from Young on the creation of Nanjing: The Burning City
Small confession: I enjoyed Michael Bay’s Pearl Harbor when it was first released. I was 18 and enjoyed a lot of terrible things. The film hasn’t aged well, but it was a modern World War II film that acknowledged China’s involvement in the war, however briefly. That always satisfied me, the way Ben Affleck couldn’t.
The actual Chinese-Japanese conflict is referred to as the Second Sino-Japanese War. The Republic of China spent the entire war effort on the defensive. A desperate Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek practically surrendered the then-capital, Nanjing, and flooded Henan Province in an attempt to halt the Imperial Japanese Army (this was ineffective and resulted in millions of deaths from starvation). It was a war of attrition, but it was in America and Great Britain’s best interest for Chiang Kai-Shek to continue fighting—to keep half a million Japanese soldiers preoccupied. China spent eight years under Japanese occupation, but its contribution to the Allied effort is relegated to footnotes in American textbooks.
Nanjing: The Burning City Interior by Ethan Young
In high school my non-Asian friends would ask, “So, why do different Asians hate each other?” Their childhoods weren’t steeped in the toxic animosity that our parents and grandparents worked to instill in us. My parents’ formative years took place during Mao’s Cultural Revolution, and anti-Japanese sentiment was still very palpable. Chinese kids were taught to distrust the Japanese, even if we were born in America and had no immediate connection to the events of the past. Then there were my Korean friends, who weren’t too fond of China. (The Korean War was essentially the US versus China, with both Koreas as pawns.)
Obviously, it’s a bit more complicated than pure, unadulterated hate, because everyone’s cultural identity was at stake. You could see it in Bruce Lee’s Fist of Fury, where he rains poetic justice on the Japanese sovereignty in Shanghai. The movie ushered in a new era for martial arts flicks, but it also solidified Lee as a Chinese icon because he was rectifying a historical wrong.
After high school, I read the late Iris Chang’s The Rape of Nanking, the kind of book that fills you with remorse, anger and sadness. Unlike Fist of Fury’s propagandistic, comical representations of the Japanese, Chang’s book employed coded anti-Japanese sentiment along with the gruesome descriptions of the atrocities. It kindles all the wrong attitudes toward Japan.
Your emotional side goes, “Screw Japan! They hurt and humiliated us, but now my favorite actor is kicking a demonstrative Japanese caricature through the dojo. Hurray!”