Sully

Clint Eastwood’s new film, Sully, is a meticulous recounting of the actions of Chelsey “Sully” Sullenberger (Tom Hanks), best known as the pilot who saved the lives of an entire passenger plane on January 15, 2009 when he miraculously landed in the Hudson. An unambiguously heroic story starring one of the most likable movie stars in the world, Sully could easily be viewed as a preemptive career move on Eastwood’s part after the controversies around American Sniper’s biographical whitewashing.
Yet, the most radical thing about Sully is its apparent disinterest in presenting this story as a thriller. Beginning with a throttling dream sequence, Sully’s opening belies its intentions. A better encapsulation comes minutes later as Sully corrects an official who calls the incident a “crash.” “It was a forced water landing,” he says assertively in a line of dialogue that would be arrogant coming from any other actor, but feels ingratiating from Hanks. In other words, by mimicking the harmony of the real-life events, this is an anti-disaster film. Sully is foremost about control, harkening back to Howard Hawks films like Only Angels Have Wings in its exploration and admiration of the complexities of duty.
Part character study, primarily a courtroom drama, Sully focuses on the investigation of Sully’s actions by the National Transportation Safety Board. Eastwood and screenwriter Todd Komarnicki aggressively analyze every minute detail and lingering rhetorical question, but the film deliberately avoids any opportunities to cast doubt on Sully’s motives. Instead, it’s far more invested in the working gears of professionalism in extraordinary situations. In fact, even details that could be smoking guns are just more chances for Eastwood to dive into process. Compared to Robert Zemeckis with Flight, Eastwood has no interest in telling a morality play; no missing clues or secret motives emerge in its final act. Sully lays out everything from the beginning, only adding wrinkles to the plot for a shade of conflict.