Television and the New Cold War
Photos: McMafia: Nick Wall/Cuba Pictures/CPL Godm; Counterpart: Starz
Though it opens with an assassination attempt on the Arabian Peninsula and charts a course through Mumbai, the Sinai, and Cap d’Antibes, McMafia’s two poles, London and Moscow, are as familiar as D.J.M. Cornwell’s nom de plume. There are complicating factors—offshore accounts in the Caymans, deliveries in Dubai, internships in New York—but AMC’s new limited series, the latest in a recent raft of globe-trotting crime dramas, expends much of its energies on the correspondences among past, present, and (foreseeable) future. For good or for ill, McMafia, from its express interest in the nature of capitalism to its sense of Europe once again in retreat, is an emblem of the medium’s new interest in updating John le Carré for the post-Soviet age, which has turned out not to be so “post-” as expected: “Russians. Drinking our beer. Pimping our women,” as a Czech man complains to Israeli gangster Semiyon Kleiman (David Strathairn) in McMafia, navigating the streets of Prague. “Like ’89 never happened.”
It’s unsurprising that TV should focus its attention on the new Cold War—pop culture is always mining the wider world for material, to the point that even the righteously old-fashioned Madam Secretary features more battles in conference rooms with Russian diplomats than with armed men on the Afghan steppes. Still, the speed at which the shadow of Putin’s Russia has come to influence the medium’s stories of spies, emissaries, politicians, and criminals is worth noting, particularly after 15-plus years in which it was practically impossible to turn on a TV without encountering some second-rate Jack Bauer chasing “terrorists” through a teeming souk. It’s not that Russians have supplanted these (always Arab, always Muslim, always problematic) adversaries, so much as they’ve destabilized their role in the prevailing narrative—in McMafia, for instance, which follows Alex Godman (James Norton), the reluctant scion of a Muscovite crime family, as he allies with Kleiman to exact revenge on his uncle’s murderer, there are still swarthy, anonymous men in kaffiyehs, but they’re middle men in a multinational sex trafficking ring, not religious ideologues. The point isn’t that this portrait is “right” or “wrong,” necessarily—it surely raises as many questions as it answers—but it does have the benefit of reframing the so-called “War on Terror” as one in which all the players, from U.S. and Russian state actors to British arms dealers (as in AMC’s The Night Manager) and ISIL sympathizers in Berlin (as in Showtime’s Homeland), are embroiled in a conflict that is actually quite commonplace, which is to say that it’s as much about money and power as it is about ideals.
McMafia, more Bourne than Bond, and coming on the heels of similarly sleek underworld dramas such as Riviera (Sundance Now), Marseille (Netflix), and The Last Panthers (SundanceTV), struggles to slough off this baggage; aesthetically (half opulent villas, half murky nightclubs) and narratively (do-gooder breaks bad to save the family), it has all the excitement of lukewarm milk. Its most bracing decision is to apply certain concepts from the Soviet-American stalemate of the 20th century to the nettlesome, still-emerging outlines of its 21st century evolution, and thus to suggest that pronouncing the U.S. the “winner” of the Cold War—much less declaring “the end of history”—was awfully suspect, or at least premature. The (off-putting) title, after all, comes from Kleiman’s plan to “franchise” his crime syndicate as though it were a fast-food chain: “Why is McDonald’s more successful than Burger King?” he asks Alex, a former Goldman Sachs employee who agrees to launder Kleiman’s money for in return for an angel investment in his firm. “One reason. There are more of them.”
In McMafia, the fundamental feature of the new Cold War, indeed of the entire post-1989 landscape, is not the struggle between capitalism and socialism; it’s the ruthlessness that the triumph of capitalism over socialism ultimately engenders—the way its logic insinuates itself into everything from cheeseburgers to sex slavery. Though she’s so naive as to be unbelievable, Alex’s girlfriend, Rebecca (the underutilized Juliet Rylance), inadvertently draws the point during a lecture on globalization and poverty, underwritten by a corrupt philanthropist. “The problem doesn’t lie with capitalism,” she says, misunderstanding the economic system’s very definition, “but with those capitalists who have put self-interest and short-term gain ahead of the good of the people.”