Beautiful Ruins by Jess Walter
Hooray for Horace

OK, class, time to discuss the classical difference between Horatian and Juvenalian satire.
There will be a quiz. Ready?
Horace, the Roman satirist, the father of gentility, emerged as a playful, witty, light-hearted kinda guy, a writer who enjoyed skewering mankind’s numberless follies. Most historians will tell you that Horace didn’t really believe in the idea of human evil—instead, he thought people happened to be a little silly, misguided, given to going off half-cocked. We struck him as delightfully funny, in a mild, gently comedic way. Horace liked to poke a little fun.
On the other hand, the satirical Roman poet Juvenal, author of The Satires, took delight in skewering his corrupt society. Savage ridicule, even scornful wrath, stand as spiky hallmarks of Juvenal’s work—he left no body unburied. Juvenal definitely believed in the idea of human evil, and he acted as his culture’s moralist, mercilessly attacking pagan Roman society for its ethical failings, and giving no quarter. Juvenal didn’t poke fun—he poked us all in the eye, with a sharp stick.
Quiz time—in which satirical camp would you put Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert? Are they Horatian or Juvenalian? What about The Simpsons? South Park?
Here’s a reasonable barometer: If you’re really mad, in fact downright furious because some issue offends your moral sensibilities so frightfully, you’re probably with Juvenal. Any significant anger in your satire lands you in Juvenal’s camp. But … if you can somehow hold your affection for humanity intact, somehow create your satire without getting all indignant, irritable and outraged, you’re most likely a Horatian.
So many modern satirists circa 2012 feel Juvenalian. We seem to have somehow misplaced the idea, politically and otherwise, that a person we satirize could be … maybe … just a little bit sympathetic. (Might he or she even be right, even if the viewpoint differs?) Our culture’s satirists today rarely poke—they stab, then twist the knife. You see the trend in television, in film, in stand-up, in Congress, just about everywhere. Take a listen to Louis C.K. or one of the other hot, angry comedians of the moment, and you’ll hear Juvenal.
But subtle modern wits will occasionally craft something eminently Horatian. Any Randy Newman song; a wistful Wes Anderson film like Moonrise Kingdom; the gentle humanism of Garrison Keillor; everything Monty Python; the quiet, hilarious poetry and prose of Jack Pendarvis—all have their origins in Horace’s amiable attacks. They each evince a wonderful subtlety, a bemused, catch-more-flies-with-honey approach that makes us happy both inwardly and outwardly.
So does Beautiful Ruins, a new novel from Jess Walter, the Spokane ex-journalist’s fifth book of fiction. Walter, who apparently can write just about anything he wants at will, has penned gripping non-fiction (Ruby Ridge); a witty farce about the Recession (The Financial Lives of the Poets, now on its way to film); a jarring post-modern literary novel that very successfully takes on the big, dark subject of 9/11 (The Zero, a finalist for the National Book Award); and a terrific series of quirky, atmospheric mysteries (Land of the Blind, Over Tumbled Graves and Citizen Vince, this last winning the Edgar award for Best First Novel). Obviously, this guy knows how to write, and his range keeps expanding.
Walter’s new book, Ruins, takes a subtly satirical look at America from the 1960s to now. He administers a general-purpose Horatian colonoscopy of our collective folly … and especially the lies and deceit endemic to our media-driven culture.
Beautiful Ruins opens in a decrepit, crumbling little Italian coastal town with a humble pension called the Hotel Adequate View, into which comes a beautiful but deathly ill American starlet, who mesmerizes the hotel’s young owner, Pasquale Tursi, who has a deep dark secret.