The Nun II Is Nun too Different from Its Predecessor

Let’s be real. It can’t be easy to be the ninth installment in any franchise, let alone one that audiences expect to reinvent the demonic possession wheel over and over and over again. And that’s exactly what The Nun II is: The ninth entry in the wildly-popular, decade-old Conjuring series, which tells stories of insidious supernatural forces across various time periods and locations.
Directed by Michael Chaves (The Curse of La Llorona, The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It) and written by Ian Goldberg, Richard Naing and Akela Cooper (M3GAN, Malignant), The Nun II takes place five years after The Nun, which ended with Sister Irene (Taissa Farmiga) and her hunky sidekick Frenchie (Jonas Bloquet) supposedly defeating the evil nun once and for all, and living happily ever after.
But nine-plus-part series don’t tend to conform to the whole “ending” thing, so when, in The Nun II, Sister Irene is informed that there is something creepy going on at a church in France, she doesn’t waste much time before packing her bags and hitting the road with a young misfit novitiate named Debra (Storm Reid).
If you’re expecting The Nun II to offer much of anything that The Nun didn’t, you should probably save yourself the disappointment. This sequel does little to differentiate itself from its predecessor. At their cores, the stories are more-or-less the same: An earnest nun travels to a creaky old establishment to take down a bloodthirsty nun by employing a sacred relic. What a cliché, right?
To give credit where credit is due, The Nun II is considerably more creative in its execution of The Nun’s plot. A scene where a newspaper stand produces a spine-chilling likeness of the nun is not only creepy as hell, but it’s also a seriously impressive feat from the film’s FX team. Similarly, a plot device involving a stained-glass goat is inventive enough to put a smile on your face, as is the wildly bone-chilling sacred relic.