Homegrown Filmmaking and Keeping the Process Personable
Director Kimberly Levin and Producer Kurt Pitzer on Runoff
Everyone has an idea for a movie, a majority of people actually want to make a movie, and I’d say a small minority of the population would be down to try. So what keeps the filmmaker hopefuls (especially congregated in L.A. and N.Y.C.) from actually producing work? Well, there are plenty of excuses. You guessed it—money is at the top of the list. Next might come manpower, then time, then that excuse only the more honest people use—I’m not good enough.
Kimberly Levin is not one of these people. For every roadblock to making a movie, she seems to have a likely path. When Paste sat down to chat with Levin and her producing partner (and hubby) Kurt Pitzer about their film Runoff, it was hard not to be impressed, especially since this is Levin’s feature debut.
An NYU Grad Film School alumna, Levin had a short, Between Baronovskys, under her belt and had also collaborated with Johnny Depp’s production company Infinitum Nihil on a TV pilot. Levin’s script for Runoff was initially pinpointed by producer Julia Chasman (Quills) while judging the Nicholl screenwriting contest. She then came on board to executive produce. With a few champions behind the production, Levin and Pitzer have completed a film that, since premiering at festivals like L.A. and Sarasota, has received critical praise, an audience fan base, and a theatrical release (if you know indie film, you know this is the coveted trifecta), and they’ve done a lot of the heavy lifting themselves.
With the help of others, of course, collaborators they’re immensely enthusiastic about, Levin and Pitzer have become part of that tiny minority to create a film they can call their own. There’s no studio title slapped on this one, no star-studded cast or script penned by an Oscar nominee. It’s just focused indie filmmaking.
Runoff centers on Betty Freeman (Joanne Kelly), a woman who runs a farm in Kentucky along with her husband Frank (Neal Huff). The setting has no shortage of bees, mud, and hogs—to which they’re feeding pharmaceuticals. The pressure to keep the family farm intact is substantial. They’re up against a corporate competition, Gigas. We smell a buyout. As the story moves along, Betty discovers more financial hardship than she expected and is forced to ask herself what she’s willing to risk for her land.
The film delivers wonderful performances from the actors, a tone that takes its audience on unexpected turns, and a pace that’s just slow enough to be eerie but precise enough to keep the film engaging. Before we give anything away (this is one of those films it’s best to see knowing only a little about), let’s get to the big question we’ve been building to: How did they do it? Paste was invited over to the Levin-Pitzer household in Williamsburg, Brooklyn to find out.
Their bohemian home is an artist’s dream. The living room is lined with tall windows, the floors with intricate rugs, and art fills the space. Levin is welcoming, asking guests to remove their shoes and then offering a glass of chilled wine. Soon her outreach crew introduces themselves, setting down their laptops to take a break and have a handful of almonds. Levin and Pitzer have recruited three ladies to their promotional team: There’s post-production art supervisor Kathy Bates (no, not of Misery), outreach coordinator Sarah Cavanaugh, and marketing assistant Katherine Harrison. The film is being released and publicized by Monterey Media, but Levin and Pitzer have put extra oomph behind their theatrical opening. It’s nearly midnight before the interview is over—and the women are still sending out emails. Talk about dedication.
Being in the space, I can see why the team feels comfortable to work late hours. Levin even edited the majority of the film in the apartment. She takes me on a tour, showing me the guest room where many a friend has crashed after staying late to work on the project. Levin’s desk and computer face an array of windows, and the bed is across the room. This is New York, people—there’s so much space! For an editor, it’s always nice to be able to breathe. Levin worked with both Michael Taylor (Love is Strange, The Comedy) and Francesc Sitges-Sardà (Toastmaster) on the edit before taking over herself. She explains, “With all the love and care you put into every word you choose, the colors, the DP [Hermes Marco shot the film], that same love and care is part of the post process.”
That said, Levin had never edited her own feature before. But she is resilient and—I forgot to mention—has an affinity for science: “Coming from biochemistry, I’m certainly not intimated by any of the tech. I’m intellectually curious about those things, figuring out how the scientific parts of it and the artistry come together.” Of course, if Levin continues on to bigger projects, she may not have the luxury of editing from the comfort of her own home, or taking over the edit at all. She admits, “Hopefully I’ll be able to find a balance.” It’s no surprise studio filmmakers like David Fincher and indie ones like Alex Ross Perry usually stick to the same editor, Kirk Baxter and Robert Greene respectively. When making a film and being immersed in postproduction, Levin admits that’s “when you meet those people that have to be in your life for the rest of your ride.”
After the Levin-Pitzer apartment tour comes a chat around some wine and cheese and an olive here or there. This is when everyone gets to the meat of things: process.