I’m Still Here Is a Story of Heartbreaking Resilience in Brazil

Between the 1964 coup right through to the mid-1970s, hundreds of Brazilian individuals were “disappeared” by the military dictatorship as part of a counter-revolutionary campaign. Among the missing were students and former politicians, rich and poor alike, swept up in the tides of brutality that beset the country with ramifications that continue to resonate to this very day. Along with those who never came home were the many family members that were also picked up and interrogated, undergoing tortuous hardships that would for years mark them with suspicion by the state and leave lasting psychological effects.
Walter Salles’ latest, and most accomplished film, I’m Still Here, allows international audiences into this world of quiet resilience and powerful response to the whims of a dictatorial regime. Following the true-life story of Eunice Paiva (Fernanda Torres) and her family over many decades, this is a powerful indictment of those that caused such harm, and a blistering celebration of one woman’s tenacious drive to seek justice and to preserve the truth for generations to come.
The film begins in sunlit beauty, with several of Eunice’s five children galivanting on the sandy shores of Rio de Janeiro’s Leblon beach. Crossing the traffic-filled street, the kids enter their welcoming home mere meters from the crashing waves, a warm and inviting place with shelves full of books, several tasty-looking treats ready for snacking, and a seemingly limitless pile of wonderfully curated records from the era.
Rubens (Selton Mello), Eunice’s husband, is a former congressperson who has returned back to the center of the city after exile in Europe some six years after the original coup. Returning to a life as technocrat, he’s seen planning on a new home for him and his brood and generally appearing smiling and affable. Underneath this warm exterior he continues to play a small role in subverting the will of the governing party, and despite the obvious need for caution he acts as a kind of courier, surreptitiously transmitting packages between differing individuals.
In January of 1971 Rubens was arrested/abducted from his home by men claiming to be part of the army, taken away in his red car after changing into a shirt and tie and voluntarily driving himself for a cooperative conversation. While those that first entered his home stayed behind, Eunice remains steadfastly hospitable, offering them meals and politely asking for updates on her husband’s career. After a day of his absence both Eunice and her second oldest daughter are similarly shuffled off to have questions asked of them, and it’s here that the story truly exposes the nefarious actions of those involved, with mother and daughter hooded before being transported to a building where for weeks they are tortured and humiliated.
This early portion of the film is presented with an impeccable sense of place, and everything from the clothing to the set design and dressing is handled with extreme dexterity. Even at the most heightened moments of suffering or anxiety the storyline never becomes overwrought, Salles’ skillful navigation of this years-long story doled out in a precise yet never ponderous pace.
The raw emotions that Eunice and others experience is also expressed in beautifully attenuated fashion, and it’s the quiet power of the character as exceptionally embodied by Torres, free from histrionics, that makes it that much more effective. From the child actors right through to the taciturn menace of the abductors and interrogators, there’s a sense of documentary-like truthfulness throughout that transcends any usual cinematic excesses.