Quentin Dupieux Puts the “Ick” in His Satirical Yannick

Yannick (Raphaël Quenard), the title subject of Parisian trickster Quentin Dupieux’s latest absurdist spotlight on humanity, is by all accounts dimwitted. Call an ordinateur portable by the long-accepted term “laptop” and you’ll short his circuits. Give him a keyboard and he’ll type one-handed at a glacial pace while making enough grammatical errors that instances where he meets the standards of basic writing begin feeling like mistakes themselves. His idea of a joke is intimidating a married couple into almost fondling each other in public, though this is admittedly a matter of taste more than intellect. But the greatest sign that Yannick is a few Adderall tablets shy of a full medicine cabinet is his art literacy, facilitated by an astounding display of arrogance: Interrupting a play in progress.
Yannick spotlights its protagonist’s vastly overinflated sense of self through this inciting event, during a production of Fernand Crommelynck’s Le Cocu magnifique, whose cast – Paul Rivière (Pio Marmaï), Sophie Denis (Blanche Gardin) and William Keller (Sébastien Chassagne) – can scarcely believe the gall of a person to stand up mid-scene and vociferously complain about his entertainment. Le Cocu apparently offends Yannick’s need to be mindlessly entertained. It makes him feel bad instead of good and this, in his calculus, is not what a play is supposed to do.
Dupieux pulls no punches conceptualizing Yannick as a delegate of entitled audiences everywhere: People who think that art, whether film or television or theater, exists to flatter them, pander to their wants – only theirs –and validate them through the embrace of a worldview that mirrors their own. (It’s easy to imagine Yannick enthusiastically buying tickets to the latest Marvel movie.) He at least stops far short of mindlessly chanting “go woke, go broke.”
Despite that point in his favor, he’s still mindless. The customer, Dupieux seems to say, is not always right, especially in scenarios like this, where the “product” is “art,” a subjective commodity — yet another argument made by the film itself. Yannick takes a stand against the attitude that, if the exhibit you paid your hard-earned money for doesn’t move you, the exhibitor owes you a refund.