5.4

The Trouble with Jessica: A Limply Familiar British Suicide Farce

The Trouble with Jessica: A Limply Familiar British Suicide Farce

Applying gallows humor toward the topic of suicide is a tricky proposition for a film, because no matter a writer’s apparent belief in their status as an irreverent, perceptive satirist of the human condition, suicide simply isn’t like other forms of death from both an emotional and social standpoint. Where an accidental death, or even an impulsive murder, might be easier to use as morbid illustrations of the fragility of life in a blunt, uncaring universe where the improbable is ever moments away from shattering our illusions of security, suicide has an intentionality inherent to it that begs for some kind of introspection. When a character commits suicide, it’s human for us to desire to understand the stark choice that was made. That isn’t to say a filmmaker needs to spell it out for us–it’s a universal human experience to feel pain or frustration at the lack of an explanation for why something tragic has happened. But that filmmaker should probably at least display some curiosity or empathy of their own, and this is the standard that The Trouble with Jessica struggles to address. Writer-director Matt Winn’s tragicomedy farce revolves around the consequences of an ill-timed death, but he’s so busy intermingling with his reprehensible characters that the film never spares much interest or empathy for the woman in its title, nor finds a coherent or incisive message in its social commentary, beyond “These folks sure are assholes, huh?”

That asshole-centric thesis puts The Trouble with Jessica in conversation with so many films, from both the U.S. and U.K., about the insufferability of the well-to-do upper middle class: Here a quartet (and briefly a quintet) of upper crust, posh Londoners with liberal overtones–the opening moments see parents Sarah (Shirley Henderson) and Tom (Alan Tudyk) expressing their disappointment that a teenage son has become an evangelical Christian, mentioning that perhaps when he’s away at college he’ll be bored and “become an anarchist,” this being implied as a more desirable alternative, or one less likely to offend the wine night social circle. They’re hosting a dinner party with closest friends/married couple Richard (Rufus Sewell) and Beth (Olivia Williams), but things have been complicated by the last-minute inclusion of additional college friend Jessica (Indira Varma), a successful memoirist and wild child who is the resident troublemaker of the social circle. This is particularly irksome to Sarah, who has never appreciated Jessica’s constant flirtation with both Tom and Richard, and was hoping for a quiet night with friends to commemorate the fact that they’re being forced to immediately sell their beautiful London home in order to stave off debts incurred by dreamer Tom’s overleveraged architecture projects. Sarah already expects Jessica to find a way to make the night all about herself; she doesn’t quite expect Jessica to do it by hanging herself in their garden right before the dessert course.

That’s exactly how it goes down, and it’s not a spoiler to note it: The whole film revolves around the fact that in the middle of a testy argument/confrontation at dinner, Jessica storms off without a word, seemingly to collect herself but in reality to kill herself, which the other four characters discover not long afterward. Of the four, the sanctimonious Beth is the only one who is immediately struck by genuinely empathetic emotion at the death. Sarah, on the other hand, spots a problem: If they call the police, she fears that the buyer about to close on their home will pull out of the sale, which will lead to Sarah and Tom’s financial ruin. With alacrity and ruthless pragmatism, she concludes that the only thing to do would be to move Jessica’s body, transporting it back to her own home, so the suicide can be discovered elsewhere and not ruin their deal. Richard and Beth, unsurprisingly, want nothing to do with this plan and the risks it would represent to their own livelihoods. But ah, perhaps there are levers that can be used to move them? Perhaps the intimacy that is compiled in a long friendship can now become a weapon in the assertive Sarah’s hands, driven by desperation? Henderson takes the reins to drive the plot forward from here, her performance casting the character as simultaneously brittle and iron rigid. Before long, they’re schlepping the corpse around to hide it from various intruders, whether it’s nosy neighbors, police inspectors, or the deep-pocketed, suspicious buyer (Sylvester Groth) who shows up with no warning, wanting to see the home he’s buying.

This central slice of The Trouble with Jessica is meant to read as a chaotic farce, balancing the evolving grievances and frayed emotional states of the core four characters against the ever-present threat of discovery in their macabre business. The hijinks, however, have a tendency to fall flat, the humor straining against improbable situations that are largely undersold by the cast. It feels like a project that was designed to be a more bombastic, one act stage play, and even at less than 90 minutes here it can feel like we’re stalling for time. Particularly when Winn attempts to push things in more ribald and risque directions, it all feels rather hollow. Even the jazz-centric score seems miscalculated, feeling distractingly intrusive at times as it barges into conversations like a fifth wheel.

The film is better off when it’s merely grinding the characters against each other without trying to contrive comedic hurdles to be overcome, instead relying on their well-worn foibles endearing and irritating their existing relationships. They all get off some good lines as they squabble, particularly the aloof Sewell as Richard, who at one point responds to Sarah’s pained “Why couldn’t she have killed herself in her own garden?!?” with a matter-of-fact “Well, she didn’t have a garden.” Tudyk is also predictably entertaining even though he’s playing a milquetoast, wishy-washy pushover of a man–he still manages to channel the occasional moment of extreme consternation that reminds one of his Tucker & Dale vs. Evil character, despite this one being a total socioeconomic opposite.

They’re all terrible people; that’s the singular point that The Trouble with Jessica has on its mind. Even Beth, who gives the strongest resistance to being involved in any of the sordid affair, standing to the side with an air of moralizing superiority, must ultimately face down her tacit endorsement of the situation, just as she must confront her willingness to enjoy a cushy lifestyle supported by a job she objects to her husband holding. The film ably points out these hypocrisies in its characters but has little to get at beyond it–and is “the affluent are hypocrites” a message that anyone is going to be surprised by? We get it; they’re selfish and they’re willing to eat Tom’s carefully prepared clafouti tart in the face of death. They only care about themselves. That doesn’t mean that Winn had to follow their example.

At the end of the day, the film’s seeming disinterest in Jessica herself is hard to get past. Why did she really feel compelled to kill herself? Was there an element of spite or passive aggressiveness involved? How did she really feel about the two men, and can their recollections of her actually be trusted, or are we still being lied to? Just how many plates did Jessica have spinning? The film attempts to answer some of these questions with a neat little bow in its closing minutes, but what it offers feels far too shallow, and too little, too late–as does the sudden, oddly sweet denouement between Tom and Sarah. The screenplay can’t suddenly make up for the fact that it has primarily treated the title character like a piece of inconvenient baggage for the vast majority of its runtime. The misanthropic nature of that underlying humor just doesn’t quite work, and comes off feeling fairly insensitive instead.

Ultimately, The Trouble with Jessica runs out of gas and limps in the direction of a contrived conclusion, lacking the mercurial spark that all its characters attribute to Jessica at one point or another. If only the experience of watching the film could be as engaging as the implied experience of knowing her.

Director: Matt Winn
Writers: James Handel, Matt Winn
Stars: Alan Tudyk, Shirley Henderson, Rufus Sewell, Olivia Williams, Indira Varma
Release date: April 25, 2025 (Limited release, U.S.)


Jim Vorel is Paste’s Movies editor and resident genre geek. You can follow him on Twitter or on Bluesky for more film writing.

 
Join the discussion...