Band on the Run is the Best Beatles Solo Album
50 years after its initial release, Paul McCartney & Wings’ 1973 masterpiece has aged gracefully and remains a timeless document of our greatest pop songwriter’s prime.
Photo by Ian Dickson/Redferns
It’s really quite fascinating, really, how Band on the Run became such a smash hit. Yes, of course, Sir Paul McCartney—a quarter of the greatest band in music history—is at the helm, but, before December 1973, that type of leadership on a solo quest didn’t always equate to a stroke of brilliance for the Fab Four. Just look at John Lennon’s Two Virgins or Mind Games, or George Harrison’s Electronic Sound, Ringo Starr’s Beaucoups of Blues or, even, McCartney’s first Wings album, Wild Life. In fact, that first handful of years after their breakup in the spring of 1970, the Beatles each took a bit to get their footing—well, except for Harrison, whose All Things Must Pass was an aces source of mastery composed largely of tracks he was never given the green light to put on a Beatles record when they were still together.
Band on the Run, though—not Ringo or All Things Must Pass or John Lennon/Plastic Ono Band—is the greatest Beatles solo album ever put together and, just perhaps, the greatest Beatles album ever. I say this knowing full well that virtually no one will agree with me. This is a cross I’ve made peace with bearing. If you are familiar with my writing, you are likely aware that I am a staunch McCartney stumper (I do have a tattoo of the “cute one” on my leg, afterall). Even when he released the career-low Egypt Station just a few years ago, I was one of the few listeners who came out of the woodwork to say that “Fuh You” is actually good. It’s a disease to awe over the work of one man so much, and the original title of this essay was going to be something along the lines of “Band on the Run is the Best Beatles Album of All Time.” I actually don’t think it’s a tight race, either. All Things Must Pass makes it interesting but, ultimately, falls short on account of it being a double-album when it could’ve (and should’ve) been a single LP.
When I was in high school, my pal Steven and I would argue over who the best Beatle was. He’d go to bat for George, and I’d preach the gospel of Paul. We’d fight over whether or not Rubber Soul was better than Revolver, but, usually, wind up agreeing on The White Album. I haven’t seen him in four years, but I know I could call him up right now and heat up the same arguments we used to have a decade ago. Back then, all of the Beatles fans in my orbit were like that: We fought tooth and nail for our favorites, cut up the rug over what record stands above the rest. Nowadays, the discourse around the Beatles is much different; folks in my generation either love them or can’t understand why the hell they’re so important in the first place. At this point, it’s basically a trend to tweet about how much you don’t care about the Beatles. I think that’s okay, such conversations don’t move me into negativity. Before Elvis and Priscilla, millennials gave up on the King. It was only a matter of time before zoomers did the same with the Beatles.
But, if you ask me, the Beatles still have an unshakable chokehold on music history. I mean, just look at the reception to their recent “final” song, “Now and Then”—it felt like the entire internet came together to, collectively, talk about a dinky little track that, if we’re being completely honest, is no better than the lesser songs on lesser Beatles albums. Say what you want about the horrible CGI in the music video or the ethics of using AI to enliven Lennon’s demo vocals, it was pretty beautiful to watch one final moment of joyous curiosity around the Beatles unfurl across social media.
I wouldn’t have expected the greatest band ever releasing their triumphant coda to go any differently, but it is weird that, upon the 50th anniversary of Band on the Run this winter, virtually no one is talking about it—aside from here-and-there rumblings about the recent anniversary edition release that is rid of orchestral overdubs. Loving the Beatles is nothing new or interesting, but loving the solo discography of a Beatle is much rarer—or, at the very least, less interesting in the larger sense of music criticism. Everyone has already poured their hearts out over the Beatles; what else is left to say about what the members got up to on their own time? Surely, there’s something to say about the multi-platinum album that solidified Paul McCartney as the greatest Beatle.
McCartney’s ability to assimilate into any instrument is not undocumented territory. He famously played drums and bass guitar on “The Ballad of John and Yoko,” one of the Beatles 20+ #1 hits, and he’s recorded multiple solo albums alone over the last 53 years. His work on Band on the Run arrives like a magical take on his entire personal canon up until that point. He uses the experimentalism he first dabbled in on Ram, makes big noise with the spine-splitting rock theatrics of Abbey Road and distills the kind of beautiful balladry he’s made into an art form. Listening to all 40 minutes of Band on the Run is like watching a genius remember that he doesn’t have to drum up new material to shine brightest, that his bag of tricks is under-explored and in dire need of a revisit. Thus, the third Wings album is a revitalization of McCartney’s heroism and an activated, mesmerizing opus.
By the time Wings set out to record Band On The Run, they had already made Wild Life and Red Rose Speedway—two records that, despite producing songs like “Tomorrow” and “My Love,” were pretty lackluster and uninspired. Where Ram and McCartney were excellent, surreal and, sometimes, abstract collections of fragmented and experimental and lovesick music, McCartney’s work with Wings hadn’t quite hit the mark like the world wanted it to. To boot, after Red Rose Speedway came out in April 1973 and the band completed a successful UK tour that July, drummer Denny Seiwell and guitarist Henry McCullough left the band during rehearsals for Band on the Run. Paul had made McCartney by himself (with added harmonies from his wife Linda) in a two-month frenzy after Lennon privately departed the Beatles in 1969, but it wasn’t the make-or-break album that Band on the Run would wind up becoming. The stakes this time around were immeasurable, and McCartney had no time to find replacement players for Seiwell and McCullough before August 1973.
So, Paul, Linda and multi-instrumentalist and ex-Moody Blues guitarist Denny Laine took to EMI’s studio in Lagos, Nigeria by themselves to make Band on the Run together—because Paul considered Lagos to be a fascinating place to record their next LP, hoping they could spend their mornings at the beach and then hole up in the studio at night. But the recording space was shit; the McCartneys were robbed at knifepoint and lost lyric sheets and demo tapes; a civil war in Nigeria had only ended in 1970, and the country was embroiled in military government corruption and rampant illnesses. EMI only had one tape machine—a Studer 8-track—and Wings had to stay in a house near the Ikeja airport, an hour away from the studio. Paul would also suffer a massive bronchial spasm from excess smoking in the Lagos heat and pass out while recording a vocal track.
Cream drummer Ginger Baker would invite Wings to make Band on the Run at his studio, ARC, in Ikeja, and they’d take him up on his offer, but only for one day. The band recorded “Picasso’s Last Words (Drink to Me)” while there, and Baker shakes a tin can full of gravel on the song (he’s credited as contributing “percussion”). Wings took six weeks to record the album in Nigeria and, upon their return to England, found a letter from EMI encouraging the band not to go to Lagos due to a devastating outbreak of cholera. Eventually, the trio would have to overdub most of the record in London at George Martin’s AIR Studios and, while there, would invite conductor Tony Visconti to provide orchestral arrangements from a 60-piece ensemble, ask saxophonist Howie Casey to add horn instrumentation on three songs (“Bluebird,” “Mrs. Vanderbilt” and “Jet”) and the band would record all of “Jet.”
Red Rose Speedway was a critical failure, and the whole world was watching what McCartney would drum up next—and patience for him to make a masterpiece was wearing thin. In turn, Band on the Run didn’t sell well upon its initial release. By the end of December 1973, the album would hit #9 on the UK Albums Chart and then, in February 1974, hit #7 on the Billboard Top LPs & Tapes chart. Singles “Jet” and “Band on the Run” would help propel the album into commercial and critical good graces, with the former peaking at #7 on the Hot 100 and the latter hitting #1 (his third #1 hit since the Beatles’ disbandment). Band on the Run is the kind of record that no one else in the world could have ever made. At only nine songs, it’s perfect from start to finish, and it features some of the very greatest entries in the popular music canon. Especially so, side one is an unbeatable five-song run—from the title track to “Let Me Roll It.”
Of course, I must back up my proclamation that Band on the Run is the greatest Beatles album of all time. I think my immediate mark of support is that, truly, it is the most dynamic record any Beatle ever made after the dissolution of the band. The sights and sounds of Wings’ breakthrough are orchestral, poppy and soaring. All at once, McCartney plugs in choral fragments, catchy verses, earworm melodies and a bevy of different genres. The greatness is practically embroidered onto every inch of the LP. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Paul McCartney is the best pop songwriter of all time, and that truth is evident to the fullest extent on Band on the Run. It’s the kind of project that reminds me of the Abbey Road medley, for how it so deftly weaves in and out of multi-tracked brilliance and romantic and sonic fascinations. Can you imagine if “Helen Wheels” had actually made the final UK tracklist (it was featured on the US release and wound up a Top 10 hit)?