The Kayfabe of Television News is Going to Kill Us All
Photo by Paul Zimmerman/Getty
The WWE does not call itself a professional wrestling company. Instead, it describes its brand as “sports entertainment.” Announcers call the wrestlers “Superstars” and the wrestlers are very careful to never actually utter the W-word. It’s a clever albeit ham-fisted company policy that tries to separate the WWE from an association of only working in wrestling. Still, the marketing doublespeak receives constant derision from fans. Wrestling is the show. While there are a variety of reality and entertainment shows in the WWE Universe, the WWE’s ancillary programs are just that, ancillary. Few people beyond Vince McMahon see the WWE as something separate from wrestling. So, the fans argue, call it what it is. They want wrestling. Modernize, yes. Adapt, sure. But don’t sacrifice your identity in order to grow and expand.
The WWE is not alone in this sort of activity, though. Television news has increasingly embraced an entertainment model of production. Facts, analysis, and debate are couched in between characters. The life-and-death realities of politics take on a dramatic flair. While this is not necessarily unique to our time (William F. Buckley’s antagonisms certainly drew attention to his show Firing Line), market pressures have exposed contradictions in the system that are harder and harder to ignore. In fact, CNN president Jeff Zucker all but admits them.
CNN Sees Itself as Entertainment
On April 4th, the New York Times published a profile on media mogul and current president of CNN, Jeff Zucker. In the profile, the Times describes the symbiotic relationship between President Trump and Zucker—the President relies upon the station’s constant coverage to get his message out and the station thrives because of the president’s antics. None of this is particularly revelatory. A news station needs news to cover. The president provides news. But the profile also describes a sinister shift at the network, a movement that embraces news as entertainment:
As Zucker sees it, his pro-Trump panelists are not just spokespeople for a worldview; they are ‘characters in a drama,’ members of CNN’s extended ensemble cast.
The very next day, Zucker’s network put out an article on the Trump administration’s statement that “all options” will be on the table regarding North Korea. The article talks about how this is a departure from diplomatic norms and how it ratchets up aggression in the region. The article also refers to North Korea as “rogue,” a statement CNN repeats over and over throughout multiple articles.
Two days later, President Trump bombed an airfield in Syria without consulting the UN, congress or any of our usual allies. For some reason, CNN did not describe this as a “rogue” action. Instead, its commentators could not wait to lavish praise upon this act. More important than hard analysis on war efforts or America’s increasing international aggression, is the character drama of good versus bad, moral versus evil. CNN does not think its viewers are capable of seeing grey in a story. They think the viewers can only understand Red against Blue.
Each of these three stories, not even separated by a week in the news cycle, acutely demonstrate how news and the profit motive cannot reliably coexist.
In wrestling, a “mark” is the fan who buys into the spectacle. It’s derived from carnival slang for the hapless consumer. CNN and televised news takes us all for marks who must be persuaded into supporting their product. If CNN sees itself as occupying the intersection between news and entertainment, perhaps it’s best to stop calling it a news network. After all, the WWE works hard to brand itself as something more than just wrestling.
The Consumer is a Mark Under Capitalism—We’re Being Worked
Jeffrey Lord is a conservative commentator for CNN. His works include comparing President Obama and his supporters with the Hitler Youth as well as declaring the Ku Klux Klan a left-wing organization. Suffice to say, Jeffrey Lord is not particularly known for being a hard analyst. Instead, he has achieved a level of recognition due to his polemic takes.