Why Does David Fincher Like Netflix So Much?
Photo: Netflix
While you may or may not appreciate Netflix or think its films should qualify for Oscars, it’s hard to deny the streaming service’s appeal for up-and-coming, disenfranchised, and/or disaffected filmmakers. But while there’s an egalitarian aspect to its distribution model that has made it a powerful force for indies, Netflix also has plenty of qualities to attract a certain kind of established screen director. One whose famously meticulous process and idiosyncratic stylings have instigated conflicts between art and commerce that led to several projects’ cancellations. One like David Fincher.
If there’s an A-list filmmaker made for the buzzword “disruptive,” it’s the guy who warned us about Mark Zuckerberg and managed to give shitty dude bait Fight Club such a good adaptation that people are still missing its point two decades later. I mean, he mocked his studio notes to the New York Times. He’s a little off-putting, a little difficult, and a little punk (or, at least, what passes for punk when you’re operating entirely within the machine of big business). Netflix is also difficult, powerful, and tends to solve problems by throwing more money at them. In other words, Netflix, with its “how do you do, fellow kids?” branding, outrageous (and/or bogus) performance claims, and unfathomable marketing schemes, is the perfect fit for Fincher—which is presumably why that’s where he’s done his only work on TV.
With the new anthology series Love, Death & Robots (which he executive produced) to add to a resume that includes House of Cards and Mindhunter, Fincher has made the streaming service his escape hatch from the world of movies: He can produce shows, direct the important stuff, and then move on without too much pressure.
Love, Death & Robots is the next step in his quest to end “22-minute and 48-minute” TV, something the heads of Netflix agree with, and his approach was to find his disaffected peers in the animation industry—those “people that don’t want to do talking-animal films.” His co-creator, Tim Miller (of Deadpool fame), had a more direct impact on the entries, doing passes on all the scripts, but with their equal billing, the series has used Fincher to show off its bona fides. Netflix knows what they have and Fincher knows what he wants. His managerial approach for the series mirrors the one he demands from his bosses: “Tell us how it’s going to work and tell us why you made these decisions, and then you let people do what they do.”
Fincher has tried doing TV elsewhere. He had a big deal with HBO. Three series: Utopia, Shakedown, and Videosyncrazy. None of them ever made it to HBO. The first to fall was sci-fi thriller Utopia (now headed to Amazon) in 2015, when the budget wasn’t just an issue, it was the only issue. “I thought we had really, really good scripts and a great cast,” Fincher said, “and you know it came down to $9 million… In the end, when you actually kind of lay it all out, $9 million in the scheme of things doesn’t sound like a huge discrepancy between what we wanted to do and what they wanted to pay for.” (If a quote doesn’t have a petty kiss-off—and receipts—it’s probably not from Fincher.)
Fincher wanted Utopia to be shot chronologically—something that would add to the visceral desperation of its protagonists as they flee a shadowy organization—on top of his usual dedication to hardcore detail. If you’re a newbie to TV and film production, filming chronologically is a gigantic hassle that effectively erases lots of time- and money-saving tactics in the service of narrative and tonal integrity. So HBO said no. Fincher said fine, I’ll take my TV elsewhere. Mindhunter (originally set up at HBO) hit Netflix the next year. The rest of the deal sank: Shakedown and Videosyncrazy were scrapped soon after, and since neither had the IP of Utopia, neither has been resurrected.