Why One Craft Beer Lover Won’t Buy “Big Beer”
Within the world of craft beer fandom, there are a few debates that will never go away. The “crafty” selections produced by U.S. mega brewers are especially divisive. Put simply, it’s a question of whether these brews are something a person who attempts to support the craft brewing industry will choose to buy. It’s a question of whether or not taste is actually the most important factor in making a purchase as a consumer. Or are your purchases informed by other, less obvious factors?
Goose Island is my closest personal example. Since the Chicago brewer’s buyout by Belgian super-conglomerate Anheuser-Busch InBev in 2011 (a $38.8 million deal), I’ve stopped buying their products, to the consternation of certain acquaintances. The decision, honest-to-god, has nothing to do with taste. Goose Island beers produced at their brewpub locations in Chicago are still winning medals every year at the Great American Beer Fest. I’m not going to claim anywhere in this piece that they’re now making substandard beer. But there’s more to my decision to eschew Goose Island than just how the product tastes.
What it boils down to in this instance is business practices. As the kingpin of the U.S. beer scene, AB InBev (along with SABMiller and Molson Coors) has done everything in its power to foster the worst possible environment for the craft brewing industry. On a surface level, it’s understandable business savvy, but the seedy underbelly is marked by dirty play.
In 2009, AB InBev first acquired a 30 percent ownership stake in Chicago-based liquor distributor City Beverage. To observers, this was a fairly obvious violation of the three-tier system of alcohol distribution enforced in 32 states, which keeps brewers, distributors and retailers separate. When AB InBev attempted to increase its ownership stake, the Illinois Liquor Commission stepped in to block the purchase. That’s when AB InBev filed suit, claiming that if they weren’t allowed to own a distributor, small craft brewers shouldn’t be able to distribute their own product. In a flash, a U.S. district court judge found in Anheuser’s favor, stripping small Illinois brewers of their ability to distribute the precious few barrels of beer they were able to produce. The law, previously in place to encourage the growth of small brewing operations, was dead.
Thus began a court battle lasting several years, as small brewers, led by the Illinois Craft Brewers Guild, fought to regain their lost ability to self-distribute. They eventually succeeded—partially. The law currently allows only breweries making less than 30,000 barrels per year to self-distribute, a fraction of the previous limit. Chicago brewers such as Revolution Brewing are poised to breeze past that number, creating a new host of logistical problems and expenses.
The suits at AB InBev are anything but fools. Once it became clear their attempt to circumvent the three-tier system wasn’t going to fly, their strategy became “Well, let’s take the craft brewers down with us if we can.” And their legal “carpet-bomb” succeeded in making Illinois a more difficult state to open a new, small craft brewery.