Moto X Pure Edition: Pure Moto, Pure Android

As the tech editor at Paste, I get to use a lot of smartphones each year. However, in 2014, the phone that was my daily driver more than any other was the 2nd generation Moto X. It was released in the fall of 2014 and was the second in this new line of Motorola phones that was started under the command of its new owner, Lenovo. Compared to the company’s previous devices, the Moto X was determined to be an affordable, near-stock Android alternative to the Samsungs and LGs of the world—and it really was.
Motorola was one of first companies to pioneer the cheap, flagship unlocked smartphone and they really did do it right. The Moto X was fast, well-designed, and had some nice features too (and none of the crap you didn’t want). In my mind, it was an example of what a great third-party Android device should be. Helpful, not intrusive.
And now, Motorola has released a new version of the Moto X called the Moto X Pure Edition (or the Moto X Style internationally). Has Motorola misstepped with its third Motorola or does it continue the high standard quality set by its previous flagship smartphones?
Hardware
The Moto X Pure Edition looks very similar to previous Moto X models. The three design features that make it stand out from the other black slabs out there are the heavily curved back, the Motorola dimple, and the two bars across the front that hide the speaker and microphone. It’s also still got the same metal frame and a host of options for color and material for the back. The only real difference between this year’s Moto X and last year’s is the small metal tab on the back that connects and the dimple. Honestly, I prefer the look of the 2014 Moto X, but this small difference is easy to overlook.
I think the bigger issue with the design of the Moto X Pure Edition comes to the options given in the famous MotoMaker. MotoMaker is Motorola’s customization tool in the company’s online store where you can choose things like what kind of material you want the back of your phone to be or various color combinations of backs, fronts, and accent colors.
Unfortunately, most of the options here are a bit ugly and just don’t fit together well—so much so that I ended up just choosing black and the standard silver finish. The white with silver finish looked decent too, but the bright colors and combinations that Motorola chose just aren’t very flattering. As for materials, I just got the standard rubber back, though the leather would have definitely been my first choice. The MotoMaker is still great though—and for just an extra $25 you can do the leather or wood backs for a really premium feel.
That all might sound like I don’t like the design of the Moto X Pure, which certainly isn’t true. Some things that I love about the phone’s design include the minimalist look of the front of the phone, as well as the really small side bezels. Speaking of bezels, the display on the Moto X Pure is beautiful. It’s a 2560×1440 5.7-inch IPS display, equaling out to around 515 pixels per inch, which is pretty competitive pixel density with other high end displays at this size on the market such as the Nexus 6P (518 ppi) or the Galaxy Note 5 (518 ppi). However, because of how small the bezels are on all sides, it really doesn’t feel as big as it sounds. It’s important to remember that even with a larger display, the Moto X Pure Edition is still smaller than a phone like the iPhone 6s Plus.
One thing that must be talked about is the camera. The weakest element of previous versions of the Moto X had always been the camera, which lagged behind phones like Galaxy devices, LG devices, and iPhones. Now the Moto X Pure has an upgraded 21-megapixel camera—and that has upped what this phone can do. However, in my time with it the consistency felt a little off. It suffers from a lot of the problems that plagued previous Moto X phones, despite the fact that you have a big sensor here. Fortunately, the camera focuses and captures fast, which makes it a camera for quickly pulling it out and snapping a photo.