Tackling Race Relations at Brett Gelman’s Dinner Table
What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

From an early age, we’re taught to avoid hot-button issues around the dinner table to make mealtime a pleasant experience for everyone. But many of us have been there when some idiot uncle/cousin/sister/in-law/whoever mentions politics, religion or another taboo topic at a family function, leading to a main course shouting match, served up with a side of indigestion. So think of comedian Brett Gelman, host of the new Adult Swim special Brett Gelman’s Dinner in America, as an uncle provocateur. He’s there to prod, provoke and elicit laughs—but most of all, force some viewers away from their comfort zones to at least consider the country’s systemic racism.
Best known for his work on Adult Swim’s Eagleheart and the Comedy Central series Another Period, Gelman once again teams up with co-creator and director Jason Woliner to write and executive produce this installment (their third half-hour “dinner” following 2014’s Dinner with Friends with Brett Gelman and Friends and last year’s Dinner with Family with Brett Gelman and Brett Gelman’s Family). Dinner in America explores race, with Gelman (who is white) leading a roundtable discussion with four black actors—Loretta Devine (The Carmichael Show), Shareeka Epps (Half Nelson), Joe Morton (Scandal) and Mack Wilds (The Wire). Though Gelman’s intentions at the outset may be innocent, his indirect racism and ignorant commentary snowballs and pushes Dinner in America way beyond alternative comedy into absurdist, confrontational television.
During a recent Adult Swim press day at Abso Lutely Productions (the Los Angeles-based film/TV company founded by Tim Heidecker, Eric Wareheim and Dave Kneebone), Gelman and Woliner discuss why they felt compelled to take on such a charged subject. “This was an issue that we care a lot about, and that is a real embarrassment to our country,” says Gelman, the person (and not the character). “We felt like we should tackle [race] in a satirical way, but also in a dramatic way. If you notice there’s things in [Dinner in America] that are not funny at all.” That’s an understatement. Their goal, he adds, was to make the audience “feel the tragedy even more because of the false promise that it was going to be a comedy.”
With the current political and cultural climate, of course they had reservations. “Our big concern was that we’d be seen as making fun of this or laughing at it,” Gelman says. “We felt the only way to tell the story was to make my character a complete villain, but have him not know he’s a villain.” They strived to create a relatable character that engages in the “kind of evil that’s just about looking the other way, or going on with your life and pretending that there’s no problem,” Woliner says. “[Which] we are guilty of as white, straight men in America,” Gelman adds.
Gelman’s buffoonish on-screen alter ego accidentally offends his guests, even before any food can be served. The police are called when a crisis emerges, and without giving too much away, we’ll just say that shit gets real—very quickly—and the dinner devolves into disaster. By the end of the special, the audience won’t be laughing—that much is guaranteed.