Are Your TV Habits Sending You to the ER?
Photo by Carsten/Getty
This article is not meant to diagnose or provide medical advice—that responsibility lies with physicians. The author is not a licensed medical professional.
Have you recently broken a leg or ruptured your spleen? Your television viewing habits may be to blame: a 15-year study of close to 4,200 adults found that hostile people who watch more TV are at a higher risk of injury.
Young men and women in four American cities completed questionnaires that measured hostility, a personality trait associated with anger and aggression. Participants were also asked how much television they watched. Then, every five years, they answered questions about TV viewing and hospitalization for injuries.
The researchers found that hostile people who watched more television were 1.5 (and, on one occasion, 1.9) times more likely to have been hospitalized during the last five years. For instance, at the year 10 follow up, 4.6 percent of hostile people who watched 1-3 hours of TV a day had been admitted to a hospital. However, the hospitalization rate rose to 6.3 percent among hostile people who watched 4-6 hours of TV a day, and reached 8 percent in those who watched seven or more hours.
Why is this? Do angry, aggressive people who watch a lot of TV tend to have weaker bones or thinner skulls? Nope. According to Anthony Fabio, MPH, Ph.D., associate professor at the Epidemiology Data Center, University of Pittsburgh, and lead researcher on the study, the connection likely has to do with what people watch. “TV programs that show more high-risk behavior—whether it’s risk taking, violence or using alcohol or drugs—seem to increase risk of injury in people predisposed to hostility,” he says.
“We think it desensitizes folks to these behaviors, so the notion [of engaging in dangerous behaviors] becomes less high-risk,” he explains. That is, people who regularly watch on-screen characters punch rivals, hot-wire cars and go skydiving without suffering serious injury may be “less likely to think they’re taking a risk” if they themselves decide to do the same.
“It’s very clear that even watching a short amount of TV featuring high-risk behavior changes viewers’ behaviors quickly,” Fabio adds. “Not permanently, but quickly.”
So what can be done? Television content is unlikely to change; high risk behaviors are inherently dramatic and therefore attractive to viewers—who wants to watch MacGyver: Insurance Adjuster? Besides, “we also know that everyone who watches an action movie doesn’t speed down the highway and get into a fistfight,” Fabio points out.