House of Lies: “The Gods of Dangerous Financial Instruments” (Episode 1.01)

If you’ve picked up a magazine or turned on your cable box lately you’ve probably seen an ad for House of Lies, Showtime’s new show about high-priced management consultants with low morals. Don Cheadle, Kristen Bell, Jean-Ralphio from Parks & Recreation and some guy with glasses smile glibly as sharks swim around them. That “swimming with sharks” biz is like the Nelson de la Rosa of shorthand imagery, and immediately points to the central problem with the first episode of House of Lies: it’s not nearly as clever as it thinks it is.
House of Lies wants to be as smart and smooth as its characters but comes off like a pay cable Three’s Company, with unlikely coincidences, comical mix-ups and a fixation on sex. It plays down to 99% populism while salivating over the riches of the 1%. It’s a smug half-hour made bearable by a strong cast and a willingness to address the economic issues that most shows (other than Work It) ignore. It handles those issues so cynically that many might be offended, but how many pay cable protagonists are admirable or respectable, anyway?
On the surface House of Lies has a lot going for it. Cheadle and Bell are fantastic actors with natural charisma, Ben Schwartz (aka Jean-Ralphio) obviously knows how to play a sleazebag for maximum laughs and the central conflict between the mega-rich and the rest of us hasn’t been this timely since the McKinley Administration. But the first episode, as written by series creator Matthew Carnahan (who also created FX’s Dirt and worked on such short-lived shows as Fastlane, Thieves and the Tim Daly version of The Fugitive), is an unlikable exercise in pay cable excess.
It’s also extremely cynical, ending with Cheadle’s group of wealthy consultants showing an even wealthier group of businessmen how to make millions while only appearing to help the same people they already screwed over. At least the show has the courage to stick to its cynical course. A boardroom presentation that feels like a neck-breaking head-first dive into truth-to-power moralizing quickly turns into the self-congratulatory cynicism expected from both financial institutions and cable dramedies about smart people in crisp suits.