Melanie Lynskey Talks Happy Christmas
Melanie Lynskey is the type of actress who, if you’re talking to a friend who doesn’t follow films much more closely than in a detached, blockbuster-of-the-month manner, you have some trouble reminding them in what they might have seen her. (If you run through a half dozen respected big screen credits and then proffer the role of deranged neighbor Rose on Two and a Half Men, you can only inwardly sigh when they finally register exclaimed recognition.) It can be frustrating, but it’s a testament to Lynskey’s considerable talents. She has a unique ability to mine vulnerability in the most exquisitely bittersweet of ways, so if you feel the punch or melancholy of her characters’ predicaments more than the force of her own individual talent, well, that’s the point.
Lynskey’s latest film is Joe Swanberg’s Happy Christmas, in which she plays Kelly, a wife, mother and blocked writer who experiences an upswing in both creativity and exasperation when her younger sister-in-law, Jenny (Anna Kendrick), upsets the quiet domesticity of she and her husband Jeff (Swanberg). Recently, Paste had a chance to chat with Lynskey one-on-one about her movie, sex talk, pajamas worn in the daytime, and the national psyche of her native New Zealand.
Paste: I understand Joe met you for Drinking Buddies, figured that he didn’t quite have a part for you in that film, but still wanted to work with you. But I didn’t know that you have a background in improvisational work, which came into play here.
Melanie Lynskey: Yeah, I never went to drama school, but from high school, or really the age of nine, I did this drama class with a local teacher, and it was almost completely improvised, which is weird. I haven’t really heard of anything like that. We would put some scripted plays on, but it was really unusual in that for most of it she would give us a scenario and we would improvise. I also did what we call theater sports, with improv. I had a team that did well in New Zealand, so it was kind of what I was most familiar with. It wasn’t training, really, but I was very comfortable with it.
Paste: The film, to my mind, is a character study that wears the thematic issues it addresses fairly lightly. Part of it is about the changing nature of what you feel most strongly about, and how that can be disorienting. Since the film doesn’t address the issues head-on, though, do you have discussions with Joe about capital-T theme, or does he basically just say, “These are the characters, and this is the sandbox I want to play around in?”
Lynskey: It’s more the second thing. Joe said, “Here are some things I’m interested in: I want to tell a story about when my brother came to live with us and was a disaster, and I also want to make a movie about how [my wife] Kris is feeling.” I think for Joe it comes from his own personal experience, and everyone brings what they can bring to it.
Paste: The film touches on the whole sub-genre of so-called “sexy mom fiction,” so did you do any deep-diving into that literature, or have a wealth of previous knowledge?
Lynskey: Oh no. When I was a young teenager, or 11 and 12 and starting to discover that, my sexy reading was like D.H. Lawrence. (laughs) I was such a dork. There were also some very sexy parts in Bob Geldof’s autobiography. (laughs) I feel so embarrassed. But I never really read that kind of stuff. I thought about reading some before the movie. I knew that Anna had read some so that she knew what she was talking about, but I wanted to be surprised if she quoted something from it because Kelly wasn’t supposed to have read it. But I’m curious now, so I might read it.