I Want to Believe: Why the New X-Files Series Will Be Worth the Wait

The movie revival didn't quite work, so why will six new episodes?

Movies Features

Sometimes it’s hard to believe that The X-Files debuted on Fox over 20 years ago—partly because David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson seemingly refuse to age, and partly because of the way the show’s world is still very much thriving in its fans’ minds. With its story of FBI agents Fox Mulder (Duchovny) and Dana Scully (Gillian Anderson)—their encounters with the supernatural and their fight to uncover a government conspiracy—The X-Files built a fan base slowly and deliberately over time, an act even more impressive given the show’s cluing in early to the power of the world wide web’s chat rooms, but gone from networks before such things as social media made brand-building so ubiquitous.

Due to this continued interest (especially via the show’s availability on Netflix and Hulu), there has already been one attempt at a revival: the 2008 film The X-Files: I Want to Believe, a standalone story that found Mulder and Scully drawn into a new FBI case years after the end of the series. All in all, it came off like a meager lark; ignoring the more recognizable themes of the series, its execution felt slapdash, its story too slight—basically, it fell short of satisfying fans’ appetite for more of The X-Files as they knew, and loved, it. Still, series creator Chris Carter has nonetheless resisted letting go of the franchise, making Internet headlines over the past few years by suggesting the possibility of more movies, though none of these came to fruition.

But then, earlier this year, a new, unexpected announcement: The X-Files would return to FOX, its home network, for a limited series with a six-episode run in 2016. Oh, but there was more: There would be an alien abduction; somehow, fan-favorite characters the Cigarette Smoking Man (William B. Davis) and the Lone Gunmen would return—despite being unceremoniously killed off in the show’s final season; and even some of the series’ best writers, Glen and Darin Morgan and James Wong, would be penning new episodes. All good signs, but doubt remains. If the underwhelming I Want to Believe set the precedent, then why get excited for another revival?

Like many television series, The X-Files by its very nature is poorly suited to the Hollywood film format, in particular due to the unanswerable questions at its core (and thus its inability to provide the satisfying resolution that film-going audiences expect) and the immersive world it crafts as the series unfolds. Though it features both serial “mythology” episodes (which follow the abduction of Mulder’s sister, his quest to find her, and the government cover-up of a possible alien invasion) and those stand-alone stories dubbed “monster-of-the-week” entries, the perspective of the former fuels the success of the latter. A new X-Files film is going to lose a lot in translation, while a new X-Files series opens up the potential for the kinds of longer story arcs that fleshed out the show at its peak.

To date, there have been two X-Files films: 1998’s The X-Files: Fight the Future and the aforementioned I Want to Believe. Fight the Future, which hit theaters in the summer between seasons five and six, was aimed squarely at the show’s dedicated fans. Though intended to stand on its own as a film, Fight the Future more or less picked up the series mythology where season five left off, with a complicated plot concerning an extraterrestrial “black oil” virus, the discovery of an alien vessel in Antarctica, and something about bees that I don’t quite remember. To fans, it probably felt like a pretty good mythology episode on a grand scale, but the general public’s response to the film, however, is best summed up in Roger Ebert’s critique: “As a pure movie, The X-Files more or less works. As a story, it needs a sequel, a prequel, and Cliff Notes.”

Ten years later, The X-Files: I Want to Believe attempted to avoid the problem of its predecessor by telling a story unrelated to the series’ mythology. It faced a more difficult road, not least because the series had resolved six years earlier after limping through its final few seasons with very little of its original spark, faltering under the weight of its increasingly convoluted storylines and the departure of Duchovny and Anderson. Instead of playing into fans’ hearts with talk of aliens and government conspiracy, I Want to Believe tells the story of a group of missing women in Virginia and the psychic former priest whose visions help solve the case. Mulder and Scully, no longer with the FBI, are nonetheless called in to help. Somewhere along the way, the film unveils a tangled story about Russian organ thieves and stem cell research and the Catholic Church and other things that don’t really make any sense. Divorced from the series at its peak popularity, and due to these problems with story, I Want to Believe was unpopular with audiences and critics alike (and especially disliked by fans, who expected more than a half-hearted acknowledgement of the themes upon which the series was built).

Clearly, as a revival of a beloved property, I Want to Believe faced many challenges—but the biggest challenge, even bigger than dealing (or not) with the extensive mythology, was to somehow capture in a single, traditional narrative film the particular point of view the series took so much time to establish. The central tension of The X-Files television show, and what made it unique when it began airing in 1993, was the fact that it gave us satisfying episodic television in an “open” serial format—meaning that smaller, micro-stories could be told and resolved, but the main questions driving the series were never really answered. The show’s fan base grew out of the perfectly balanced expectation that each episode, mythology and monster-of-the-week alike, would stay in touch with larger, overarching, explicitly X-philic questions: What constitutes a supernatural event? Do extraterrestrials exist? To what extent is the government concealing the existence of aliens and other supernatural phenomena? And usually, just when we think we know an answer, we’re thrown a new curveball.

Though the individual story of the week would typically come to a resolution (though often with one or other of the agents admitting, in final voiceover, that findings are “inconclusive”), regular X-Files viewers understand that much remains unsolved. Hence the show’s most famous mantra: The truth is out there. It is that haunting open-endedness, that out there that drives the entire enterprise—that out there that sparked online message boards and fan conventions the world over.

When dealing with serial drama, television fandom is all about possibility. This is why the “cliffhanger” became a sweeps week staple: We sort of want to know what’s going to happen, but even more we’re dying to speculate and anticipate. The X-Files became successful not just by indulging this desire but also by making it the centerpiece of the show. (Mulder in Fight the Future: “If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized, or easily referenced.”) The show didn’t have us simply asking what would happen next, it encouraged us to pore over the details of what already happened, looking for any shred of a clue. This is the obsessive joy of The X-Files as a series; just ask any LOST or Pretty Little Liars devotee.

Thus, the show’s driving philosophy aligns with Mulder’s belief that we must continue to seek the Truth, an elusive concept that we chase with growing awareness of the impossibility of the task. (Mulder in “Quagmire”: “I know the difference between expectation and hope. Seek and ye shall find, Scully.”) Throughout the series, Mulder and Scully actually see a number of aliens and UFOs, experience abductions, and encounter countless unexplained phenomena. But we, like them, never know if we can trust what we see, or what we think we see. As a mysterious air force pilot tells Mulder in one of the series’ most brilliant episodes, “Jose Chung’s From Outer Space,” “I’m not sure we’re even having this conversation. I don’t know if these mashed potatoes are really here. I don’t know if you even exist.”

By placing viewers on this stymying quest with Mulder and Scully, The X-Files creates a paranoid lens through which we start to view everything that occurs in the world of the show. This way of seeing is developed through repeated exposure to the show’s tropes: The more we watch, the more we notice locked doors, secret files, shifty-eyed government agents and our villain’s cigarettes burning just out of frame. Like Mulder, we are always on the lookout for something askew, and always brushing off the most logical explanations (as we have seen, left-field theories are more often than not borne out in the course of the series). In each episode there’s a feeling of withholding, which leads to a breathless sense of possibility: If there’s nothing to hide, then why would everyone go to such lengths to hide it?

Here is where the difference between series and film becomes most apparent. To extract a stand-alone story for an X-Files film is to remove that paranoid lens, as it’s too enormous a task to attempt to re-establish the series’ point of view in a film’s roughly two-hour time frame. If you go too big, you risk alienating a potentially larger audience with a messy story and an ambiguous ending (and, in industry terms, screwing over the possibility for the series, in some form, continuing); if you go too small, you lose everything that separates The X-Files from your average crime procedural. While, certainly, most X-Files episodes can be viewed out of context and understood, much of what makes the show appealing—what makes it extraordinary and addictive—is lost on the casual viewer. For The X-Files to create its sense of mystery, it has to have a memory.

What makes me optimistic, then, for The X-Files revival is the possibility that a series format will enable a re-building of the show’s paranoid world, and perhaps re-capture a bit of its original essence. As we’ve seen with limited series like Fargo and True Detective, proper pacing can make up for a limited run of episodes. The writers will have at least a little more time to delve back into the show’s conspiracy-theory mindset and the freedom to return to those open-ended questions that always propelled the series. When the new series was announced, Carter told The Daily Beast, “I know what I want to do, how I want it to lay out—the balance of mythology to stand-alone episodes.” Considering the episodes announced so far—one by Carter and others by two of the original series’ best writers, Glen and Darin Morgan—this does seem to be the plan. Darin Morgan, in particular, is known for writing some of the series’ greatest monster-of-week-episodes, and if the title of his newest contribution (“Mulder and Scully Meet the Were-Monster”) is any indication, it will be an addition to this canon.

Though it’s not clear whether the show will attempt to pick up (and untangle) any thread from the original series’ story, Carter told Entertainment Weekly that he plans to situate the new series in alarmist post-9/11 America: “We’re being spied on now, we’re being lied to — all things that, for me, remind me of when I grew up, which was right around Watergate. I think we’re in similar and much more dire times right now.” If this sounds familiar, it’s likely because you’re remembering the original series’ Watergate-referencing first season, which even featured a character called “Deep Throat.” This adherence to similar themes, plus the fact that Carter is said to be reviving characters confirmed dead in the previous series (once again, seeing is not necessarily believing), suggests a return to the paranoid perspective that propelled the series.

In spite of the series’ slow fade throughout its later seasons, The X-Files has never felt finished, in the same way we’ve never been able to close the book on the great mysteries of our time (the Kennedy Assassination, Roswell, Bigfoot, Donald Trump’s hair). The timelessness of the show lies in the way it prompts us to consider the mysteries of the universe and comforts us with the notion that there are answers out there we will one day find. Now with the revival, The X-Files not only has a history of American paranoia and mystery from which to draw, but an extensive and complex history of its own.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share Tweet Submit Pin