What Stranger than Fiction Taught Me about Deciding Your Own Fate

“Little did he know”: A third-person omniscient that, for all intents and purposes, rules all of our lives. That’s the nature of human existence. Hindsight is 20/20. We can only learn—and live—as we go along, and there are no shortcuts in life’s lessons. On top of it all, we can’t get our time back. We can’t rewind and redo. If I’m being honest, all of that has sort of bothered me over the years, growing up. I’ve had my issues with it, the way the casual mundanity of life can have you waking up in a year asking where it all went, and how we so often get stuck in the monotony of surviving that we miss out on living. When I first saw Stranger than Fiction in 2006 as a freshman in high school, I hadn’t lived enough to truly get the gravity of the film’s message: To live your life to the damn fullest no matter what. I hadn’t even started navigating the complexities of being a teenager. But 15 years later, I feel intimately familiar with the film’s heart and soul in a way I never could when I first fell in love with the picture because I have, at times, been living a similarly blasé life to Harold Crick.
Stranger Than Fiction follows Crick, a quiet and contemplative IRS agent (a pitch-perfect Will Ferrell) who one day realizes that a woman’s voice has been narrating his rather boring and routine daily life. The mysterious narration begins to plague his curiosity and then forces him to reckon with the life he’s been living when it claims that (little does he know) his death is imminent. On Crick’s quest to find the woman seemingly writing his fate and convince her to reconsider, he broadens his capacity for experience and discovers what it means to live a full life in love and passion for all things.
As an almost 30-year-old, the stagnancy of Crick’s life is painfully close to my own. It comes down to a lot of things: My hang-ups, my comforts, my perceived capacity for change. Director Marc Forster and screenwriter Zach Helm paint this picture in spades with Crick, who eats, sleeps and spends his free time all alone with only his work to keep him company. After college, my life followed a similar trajectory where I was working to live and spending my downtime recouping and zoning out on palatable TV and junk food. While Crick’s life was a little more clean-cut and meticulous—a fun on-screen control panel overlay throughout the film gives this an incredible sense of routine and rigidity for emphasis—the foundation was the same for us both. Neither of us seemed to be going much of anywhere. It isn’t exactly bleak—after all, anything can truly change the course of life—but it is common and cyclical, and once you start thinking about it, it becomes something close to grim. Something shocks Crick out of it, though: That voice.
Throughout his struggle to locate this all-knowing woman (whom Crick eventually finds as writer Karen Eiffel, played by Emma Thompson), the taxman ends up on a path that drastically alters the course of his life by forcing him to face the truth of it all: That he won’t be here, able to experience things, forever. He moves in with a friend after his apartment is accidentally demolished (an incident that proves he does not control his fate); he takes up a musical instrument; he goes out on a limb and tries to build a connection with a woman he is auditing who, unsurprisingly, can’t stand him. And, shocker, it all begins to work out in his favor. A life simply lived becomes a life truly fulfilled—and Crick begins to see himself as living proof of that concept. He starts to form a romance with his audit target (a baker played by Maggie Gyllenhaal), he buys a guitar, he starts living in the moment. Eiffel describes it in one of her omniscient monologues as “resuscitating his life and reviving his hope,” which I think is pretty damn accurate, speaking as someone who made similar efforts over the years to revitalize their will to live another day.