The Newsroom: “Amen” (Episode 1.05)

In last week’s review, I admitted to “hate-watching” the first few episodes of this series, and I want to clarify that point. I approached the series with great optimism, but I felt the first sampling was so awful that it warranted noting. My only experience with Aaron Sorkin had been The Social Network and Moneyball, both of which were solid films. Ruminating on this between episodes, I had a Sorkpiphany: The subjects of those movies, Mark Zuckerberg and Billy Beane, respectively, were more intelligent than their peers. The focus of each story, in fact, is how that superior intellect allowed them to excel in their chosen fields. Neither of these characters were offensive because they were based on real people and their remarkable achievements.
On the other hand, many people (myself included) perceive the hyper-intelligence of the characters to be a major flaw of The Newsroom in large part because these broadcast journalists did not exist at the time these stories broke. As such, it is insulting to the hardworking broadcasters and thoughtful news consumers to suggest that it could be done better when the fiction Sorkin presents is aided by hindsight.
Many of the show’s flaws are also tied to its fictionality. Sorkin’s shows, particularly The Newsroom, rely on a certain level of verisimilitude—that is, the essence of reality through the use of real events or issues. This creates something of a docudrama feel that creates dissonance with Sorkin’s tendency toward melodramatic storyline and character development.