British Import The Woman in White Can’t Seem to Solve the Mystery of Its Source Material
Photo: Courtesy of The Woman in White Productions Ltd. / Steffan Hill / Origin Pictures
Published serially as a “sensation novel” in 1859, Wilkie Collins’ The Woman in White has everything a discerning TV viewer in 2018 could want: moody, Gothic settings that only get moodier and gothier as the story progresses; headstrong women who set themselves firmly against the entitlement of the men, vicious and disinterested alike, who might be instruments of their devastation; a mystery that is as much about class and power as it is about a dead girl. Doppelgängers. It even (centrally!) has doppelgängers—a.k.a, television’s (and Paste’s) favorite excuse to pull out the old “actors playing their own twin” trope.
The almost spooky small-screen adaptability of Collins’ proto-mystery novel goes even deeper, though. It goes so deep, in fact, that one would be forgiven for wondering if Collins might not have been a time-traveler all along, stuck in Victorian England with nothing but the dream of an industry yet unborn to keep him muddling through. On the meta level, the collection of voiceover-ready “investigative notes” of which its uncommon narration is comprised functions as a series of framing devices that, as one limited-perspective account breaks off and passes the torch to another, weave anxiety and dread into even the simplest domestic scenes. On the specific and improbably camera-ready level, it has a complicated human-shaped shell game playing out across the English countryside, a woman donning her darkest cloak and petticoats to scramble across roof tiles in the rain, at midnight, to spy on the deadly plots being hatched behind her back, and a catastrophic fire in a dilapidated parish church that sees one protagonist rise to hero by banging together a battering ram to break down the vestry doors.
It is, in short, the thrilling feminist mystery costume drama that fans of any one of those things might, here in the ragged fall of 2018, be grateful to snuggle up in front of at the end of each bruising week.
Or at least, it should be. But while the sharply chilling preview of the the newest take on Collins’ classic, produced by the BBC and set to premiere Sunday on PBS, seemed to indicate an understanding of the novel’s on-screen potential, any hope that understanding might prevail falls apart the moment it becomes clear that condensing the 700-page brick into a tight five hours meant turning Collins’ carefully arranged “investigative notes” into a series of flash-forward interviews, conducted after the [spoiler] by a hired scrivener invented from whole cloth for just this purpose. And when I say [spoiler] I mean, the show spoils the book’s first central mystery immediately. Like, in the trailer immediately.
The fact of Laura Fairlie’s suspicious death (sorry! blame the BBC!) is not the only thing spoiled by the forcible insertion of scrivener Erasmus Nash (Art Malik) into the narrative—his presence also neutralizes the anxiety and dread Collins built organically with the shifting, singular frames of his original narrative structure, thus forcing the series to find ways of regaining that dread through heavy-handed camera work and sound design. It also directly contradicts, from the outset, the conclusion that romantic hero Walter Hartright draws upon completing the investigation, without the help of any paid outside agent, about the valedictory benefits of his own relative poverty. And whatever the flash-forwards of the miniseries’ premiere might indicate, Walter’s survival is not a spoiler—it is the one established fact of the book’s original narrative, of which he is the fictional editor. Just one more element of Collins’ original, lost to the bulldozing whims of careless adaptation.