From Will & Grace to Dynasty, Why TV Networks Are Banking on the Nostalgia Boom
Photo: Chris Haston/NBC
The cliché “everything old is new again” has never been more apt.
This season, viewers will be treated to revivals of Will & Grace, Roseanne and American Idol. They join the reboots of Gilmore Girls, The X-Files and Prison Break. There are also returns-with-a-twist, like Netflix’s Fuller House, which is about to begin its third (!) season, and Disney Channel’s Raven’s Home, which premiered in July. On September 25, CBS’s Young Sheldon will be another series, like ABC’s The Goldbergs and Fresh Off the Boat, which is set in a bygone decade. Oh, and let’s not forget the remakes, including The CW’s new take on the iconic Dynasty.
What is going on? What has happened to originality? Why are there so many shows not rooted in a unique idea?
Ellen Gray, television critic for the Philadelphia Daily News and Inquirer, agrees that there are more nostalgic shows now. “But we are seeing more of everything. There’s so much more content,” Gray says, noting the explosion of streaming platforms and cable channels getting into original programming. “Fuller House isn’t on [its original network] ABC. Fuller House is on Netflix.”
TV has always looked back, Gray says, whether it was Happy Days, a show set in the 1950s that aired in the 1970s or That ‘70s Show, which premiered in 1998. “Now we are seeing people who grew up in the ‘80s and ‘90s doing shows about the ‘80s and ‘90s,” Gray says. “Television is their cultural reference. The people who remember it fondly are now in charge of things and also there’s an element of desperation. What they really, really miss is the days of many more millions of people watching individual shows on the night they were on. Networks don’t want to take a lot of risks. They want to hold on to what they have and they’re managing decline.”
Korbi Ghosh Biggins, a Los Angeles-based psychotherapist, says viewers crave this kind of programming because of the psychological concept known as “the mere-exposure effect.” It’s a fancy way of saying that decades of research have proven that people have an affinity for things that are familiar. “Even if those things aren’t necessarily that great, even if all their choices are of equal value, even if the unfamiliar choice is of greater value, the familiar choice is likely to be perceived as better,” Biggins explains. “I imagine network execs are very well aware of this phenomenon. Because there is so much television on. With cable and broadcast and streaming, it’s hard to make a product that stands out. So if you’re presenting something that’s already familiar to a good number of the viewers whom you’re trying to attract, half the battle is already fought.”
Accompanying this reboot-a-poolza is a sense of arrested development. Even though Rory Gilmore (Alexis Bledel) was technically in her 30s when the much-anticipated Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life debuted on Netflix last Thanksgiving, Rory acted like a girl who had just graduated from college. She was still quasi-dating her bad-boy boyfriend and directionless when it came to her career and her future. The daughters have moved back into their childhood home on Fuller House and the now-divorced Raven (Raven-Symoné) and her childhood best friend are living together with their children on Raven’s Home.