A Lonely Geography: João Pedro Rodrigues on O Fantasma
Photo: Vittorio Zunino Celotto/Getty Images
In last year’s The Ornithologist, one of our picks for the best films of 2017, gorgeous Fernando (Paul Hamy) seems as though he is ready for the surrounding wilderness to consume him entirely. To rid him of his immense loneliness. If he finds himself in porn-reminiscent scenarios and mise-en-scene—like getting tied up to a tree a la St. Sebastian or urinated on—those incidents are flashes of something that injects him with life and feverish sensuality.
The Ornithologist is the latest film care of Portuguese director João Pedro Rodrigues, whose work could be a grand exploration of the topography of queer loneliness: not just its intangible ephemera, but the relationships his characters have with their physical setting. He began this keenly observed, dream-like journey with his first feature, O Fantasma (2000), which follows a young trash collector, Sérgio (Ricardo Meneses), whose becoming of self may transform into an unbecoming. Rodrigues recontextualizes the explicit, fetish-adjacent sex, suffusing it with emotion: Sérgio’s anonymous fucking has a thrill and a streak of melancholy. A crucial shower scene continues to reveal how alone Sérgio is, as he, in spite of an obsession with another man, is consumed by marginality.
Long out of print and only seen through torrents and, amusingly, on PornHub, Rorigues’s O Fantasma is finally getting re-released in the U.S. on DVD, for the first time in nearly two decades, through Strand Releasing. Over the phone, Paste talked to the director, speaking from Lisbon, about making the film, and the queer loneliness and intimacy of his work.
Paste Magazine: Could you tell me a little about the origins of your debut?
João Pedro Rodrigues: It all started when I was living in Lisbon. From my apartment window, I could see the trash truck go by in the street where I live. I was going confidently to the window to look at the people that were working in this trash collection, that were doing this job. It almost started, I think, as almost voyeuristic, like trying to find out who these people were by looking at them, like physically, from my apartment window. And so I wanted to contact them, and I asked permission to follow them. I followed them there for around six months. There wasn’t a script, because I wanted to know more about how they were working, who these people were a little bit, their background. So what I did was, during the six months, I went twice a week to the depot where they depart at night. I followed them everywhere, even in the trash truck, where I was experiencing being at night in the street. I was able to ask them any questions. I was more interested in hearing talk about themselves. Because the film became kind of like a documentary; even though you see a lot his coworkers, it’s not really about them. It’s more about this guy, that has his life as a trash collector, but also his fantasies.
His personal life and his professional life as a trash collector get entwined. For me, the trash collectors trace a kind of geography of the city. This route traces kind of a map, which is like a map of the city of the outskirts. Many places that I shot in the film are places that I’ve known since I was a child. When I started making films or thinking about making films, I had this urge. I always felt these places were, in a way, potentially locations for a film. I didn’t know which stories I was going to place in those locations, but they were places that intrigued me. Like, this [is an] investigation about trash collectors—who are these people?—and [also] the places around the apartment where I lived and have always lived since I was born. Because I live in my grandmother’s apartment now. Not that I was living here when I was a child, but it was my grandmother’s place, so I’ve always been here. That, I think, was the origin of the film.
Paste: You talk a lot about the different locations in the film, and how they’ve always been a part of your life. How have those locations in O Fantasma changed or evolved since the making of the film?
Rodrigues: It’s funny because, as I still live here, I go by these places almost every day. Not all of the places, [obviously]. But they haven’t changed much. This is the north of the city; it’s a part of the city that was built in the ’50s and the ’60s. Before that, there was nothing here. It was just countryside, and there were just like old farms. So there’s still a lot of these traces of a past that was not really the past of a city, was more of a past when this was not Lisbon. So I think it’s also a borderline. It’s a borderline territory, in between urban and more countryside. For me, these places tell stories just by themselves, because they are kind of ruined. You see ruins of old farms. You see ruins of old roads. You see a past that becomes also part of the fiction, in a way.
Paste: A lot of your filmography, particularly O Fantasma, takes place at night. And you have this fascination with nocturnal life. Where does that come from? And what were some of the more technical preparations you did in order to shoot throughout the night landscape in Lisbon?
Rodrigues: There’s a very practical reason, also. I don’t know how it is in the U.S., but here, almost all trash collectors work at night, so trash is collected at night. This character is someone who sleeps during the day and works at night. It’s the opposite of most of the people that live in the city, who work during the day—and not just in Lisbon, but everywhere else in the world. That already adds a kind of mysteriousness, because everything is empty. They work while other people are asleep. By talking to these people, they almost know the habits of the people that live inside the houses. They go by the houses, they see people going in, they know more or less, “That person there goes to bed at this time because the window—” They pay attention sometimes to those details. They see lights that are on in that house at this hour. So in a way they have a kind of like extra power or extra knowledge of the areas that they work with. Because they also don’t do all of Lisbon. There are several teams of garbage collectors that do part of it. Here in my area, there’s one team—but in the next area, there’s another team.
So they are very familiar with this kind of landscape that is, by itself, a lonely landscape. Because it’s not populated; people are asleep. There’s cars parked, or silent houses, or dogs, sometimes the trash car goes by the houses… There’s not just buildings; there’s a lot of small houses in this area, like cottages. So there are a lot of gardens and a lot of dogs. A lot of people have dogs. So they even know which dogs are there. Each team departs from these depots and generally in these depots there are dogs. And there was a dog when I first when there. We even worked with the real dog of that depot, so there is a strong connection [between] the people [in that depot and] the dog. I was interested also in this idea of human versus animal, because [Sérgio is] a character that acts a lot by instinct. So, this borderline between humanity and animality, and rationality and irrationality, was something I was very interested in exploring. The bond he has with the dog was something that was established from the start of writing the script.
Paste: And there’s something very spiritual about that as well. I mean, the dog’s name is Lorde.
Rodrigues: Yeah, that’s true. But, you know, he’s called “Lorde” because the dog was called “Lorde.” It was totally by chance, because as we worked with the real dog, it was not possible to change the dog’s name. That dog was trained. At first we tried to train another dog, but he was not used to the trash trucks; he was afraid. So this dog was already working with these people, was used to all these people. It was a long process, but they trained him and he was already called “Lorde.” That was kind of by chance. (laughs)
Paste: There’s also this dreamlike quality to your cinema that influences a surreal approach to gender and sexuality, but also has this potential to unearth truth about the self. Could you talk a little bit about that?
Rodrigues: I think perhaps my films are all about intimacy, and how you live with your own self. Most of my characters are kind of lonely. And the purpose or the story of the films is kind of how they get in touch—or not—with other people. How do they connect with other people? Also how it’s difficult to connect with other people. Perhaps that comes from something personal in myself, that I was also always kind of lonely. So I think my films also reflect myself in a way—although I don’t see them as autobiographical.
I think it also comes from the actor. When I found Ricardo Meneses, who played Sérgio, the main character of the film, there’s a lot of animality in him. He was also a kid; we found him when he was 17. We had to wait until he reached 18 to be able to shoot the film because he could not be underage. But he was happier for doing the film. He was not born in Lisbon. He was born in the north of Portugal. So he also came to the city to make a life [for] himself, in a way. Like in that dream, you know? As a kid, he more or less ran away from home, in order to try and achieve something of his life. So there’s a lot of that in the character, I think, someone that is determined to reach something, but has to deal with tough things, especially at that young age. He came to Lisbon when he was 16, by himself, alone. He had a pretty tough life until the film. So I think that also kind of formed the character. Ricardo in the end became the character of the film.